Ypthima microconjuncta Lang, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5659.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E1CA4434-2D2D-4D33-8772-CD6EA703DAB2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15823039 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B287DC-FF82-5216-23EF-5295FDF9F81E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ypthima microconjuncta Lang, 2024 |
status |
|
Ypthima microconjuncta Lang, 2024
( Figs. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 9F View FIGURE 9 , 10F View FIGURE 10 )
Ypthima microconjuncta Lang, 2024 , Atalanta 55 (1/2): 244, figs. 1, 4a, 5. TL: Shibing, Guizhou.
Material examined. 1 ♂, holotype, CHINA, Guizhou, Shibing, Yuntai-shan , 800 m, 1.VI.2024, leg. Song-yun Lang ( CMNH) ; 2 ♂♂, paratypes, CHINA, Guizhou, Shibing, Yuntai-shan , 800 m, 1-2.VI.2024, legs. Hou Jiang & Song-yun Lang ( LSY) ; 1 ♂, paratype, CHINA, Guizhou, Shibing, Yuntai-shan , 800 m, 9.VI.2023, leg. Hou Jiang ( LSY) .
Diagnosis. On Asian mainland, the appearance of Ypthima microconjuncta is very similar to Y. atra , and it can be distinguished from the latter by the combination of the following characters: 1) on the forewing upperside, the yellowish ring of the subapical ocellus is ill-defined, whereas it is clear in Y. atra ; 2) the ground colour of upperside is more greyish, whereas it is more brownish in Y. atra ; 3) the laminae of androconia ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) are very stout, whereas they are generally somewhat narrower and slightly elongated in Y. atra ( Fig. 10B View FIGURE 10 ); 4) in lateral view, the dorsal lobe of valva ( Fig. 9F View FIGURE 9 ) is triangular with an acute tip, whereas it is rounded and less produced in Y. atra ( Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 ).
Ypthima microconjuncta can be easily separated from its sibling species Y. angustipennis from Taiwan Island by the combination of the following characters: 1) on the forewing upperside, the subapical ocellus is oval with its yellowish ring blurry, whereas it is more rounded with its yellowish ring clear in Y. angustipennis ; 2) on the hindwing underside, the subapical ocelli in spaces 5 and 6 are relatively small, whereas they are obviously enlarged in Y. angustipennis ; 3) on the hindwing underside, the striae are thinner and denser; 4) the laminae of androconia ( Fig. 10F View FIGURE 10 ) are very short and nearly triangular at basal two thirds, whereas those in Y. angustipennis are elongated and have the basal two thirds nearly squarish ( Fig. 10E View FIGURE 10 ).
Distribution. China (E. Guizhou).
CMNH |
The Cleveland Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Satyrinae |
Genus |
Ypthima microconjuncta Lang, 2024
Ding, Cui-Zhen & Lang, Song-Yun 2025 |
Ypthima microconjuncta
Lang 2024 |