Trhypochthoniellus grandensis, Ermilov & Mary, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.22073/pja.v14i3.87161 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A3C111BA-FA78-41BA-AAB9-55527D58ADFB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16964399 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/601387C3-FFAD-2551-FE2F-F8CAFB29E4AC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Trhypochthoniellus grandensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Trhypochthoniellus grandensis sp. nov. ( Figs. 9 View Figures 9–11 –21)
http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:906C1FC0-6E21-4615-A111-BF853555F28A
Type material
Holotype (female) and nine paratypes (nine females): New Caledonia, Grande Terre Island , Kwé Ouest River, 22° 17' 45.8912" S, 166° 55' 37.5985" E, 177 m a.s.l., location 1 (KO4-20-I), benthic sample (N.J. Mary). GoogleMaps
Type deposition
The holotype is deposited in the collection of the Senckenberg Museum of Natural History , Görlitz, Germany ; three paratypes are deposited in the collection of the University of Tyumen, Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia ; six paratypes are in the personal collection of the first author. All specimens are preserved in 70% solution of ethanol with a drop of glycerol .
Diagnosis
Body length: 510–555. Rostrum nasiform, with short, longitudinal ridges. Notogaster and anogenital region with slight polygonate ornamentation. Bothridial seta and bothridium absent. Relative length of prodorsal setae: in ˃ le ˃ ro. Fourteen pairs of notogastral setae (p 3 absent; f 1 as alveolus) setiform, nearly smooth; relative length of notogastral setae: c 3, e 2, h 1, h 2, p 2 ˃ cp, e 1, h 3, p 1 ˃ d 2 ˃ c 1, c 2, d 1, f 2). Six pairs of genital setae. All leg tarsi with three claws.
Description
Measurements – Body length: 540 (holotype), 510–555 (paratypes); body width: 300 (holotype), 277–300 (paratypes).
Integument – Body color light brownish to light yellowish. Body surface densely porose (clearly visible under high magnification, ×1000). Notogaster and anogenital region with poorly observed polygonate ornamentation. Rostral region with several short, longitudinal ridges.
Dorsal view; 10. Rostrum, dorsal view; 11. Ventral view.
Prodorsum ( Figs. 9, 10 View Figures 9–11 , 12 View Figures 12–15 ) – Rostrum distinctly protruding, nasiform, narrowly rounded, curved ventrad. Rostral (45–49), lamellar (79–82), interlamellar (150–157), and first exobothridial (19–26) setae setiform, nearly smooth. Distance between insertions of setae le–le shorter than ro–ro. Bothridial seta and bothridium absent. Second exobothridial seta represented by alveolus.
Notogaster ( Figs. 9 View Figures 9–11 , 12 View Figures 12–15 ) – With parallel lateral sides or slightly dilated medioposteriorly; anterior margin nearly straight; posterior margin rounded. Fourteen pairs of setae, including alveolus of f 1 (seta p 3 completely absent); c 1, c 2, d 1, f 2: (19–22), d 2 (30–37), cp, e 1, h 3, p 1 (52–64), and c 3, e 2, h 1, h 2, p 2 (75–82) setiform, nearly smooth; f 1 slightly distanced from h 1. Distance between insertions of setae c 1 – c 1 subequal to d 1 – d 1 or slightly longer. Opisthonotal gland opening and all lyrifissures distinct.
Gnathosoma ( Figs. 13–15 View Figures 12–15 ) – Subcapitulum size: 101–105 × 109–112; subcapitular setae (a: 22; m, h: 11–13) setiform, roughened; a thicker than m and h; adoral seta or 1 (9–11) leaf-shaped, smooth versus or 2 (11–13) and or 3 (11–13) setiform, roughened. Palp length: 67–71; setation: 0–1–1–1– 9(+ω). Chelicera length: 109–112; seta cha (13) setiform, barbed; chb (19) setiform, roughened.
Epimeral and lateral podosomal regions ( Figs. 11 View Figures 9–11 , 12 View Figures 12–15 ) – Epimeral setal formula: 3–1–3–2; setae 1a, 1c, 2a, 3a, 4a (5) spiniform; 1b, 3b, 3c, 4c (19–22) setiform, roughened.
Anogenital region ( Figs. 11 View Figures 9–11 , 12 View Figures 12–15 ) – Anogenital formula: 6–0–1–2; genital (26–30), anal (19–22), and adanal (26–30) setae setiform, roughened. Anal lyrifissure not visible; adanal lyrifissure distinct.
Legs (Figs. 16–21) – Tridactylous; claws similar in thickness, slightly barbed on dorsal side. Formulas of leg setation and solenidia: I (1–6–3–4–14) [1–1–3], II (1–5–3–3–12) [1–1–2], III (2–2– 2–2–10) [1–1–0], IV (1–2–2–2–11) [0–1–0]; homology of setae and solenidia indicated in Table 1.
Figures 16–21. Trhypochthoniellus grandensis sp. nov. (adult) – 16. Leg I (trochanter omitted), left paraxial view; 17. Tarsus, tibia, genu, and anterior part of femur of leg I (solenidia and many dorsal setae except their insertions omitted), left, ventral view; 18. Leg II (trochanter omitted), left paraxial view; 19. Tarsus, tibia, and anterior part of genu of leg II (solenidia and many dorsal setae except their insertions omitted), left, ventral view; 20. Leg III, left, antiaxial view; 21. Leg IV, left, antiaxial view.
Comparison
Trhypochthoniellus grandensis sp. nov. is similar to T. malaconothroiformis Ermilov, Hugo-Coetzee & Theron, 2017 View in CoL from South Africa, having a medium number of genital setae (less than eight pairs), the presence of notogastral setae that vary greatly in length, and in the absence of the bothridial seta, bothridium, and prodorsal polygonate ornamentation. The new species differs from the latter in having six (versus seven) pairs of genital setae; the morphology of the rostrum (nasiform, with several longitudinal ridges versus not nasiform, with median, longitudinal furrow); the relative lengths of the notogastral setae (c 3, e 2, h 1, h 2, p 2 ˃ cp, e 1, h 3, p 1 ˃ d 2 ˃ c 1, c 2, d 1, f 2 versus p 2 ˃ c 3, cp, e 2, f 2, h 1, h 2, h 3, p 1 ˃ c 2, d 2, e 1 ˃ c 1, d 1); the presence (versus absence) of slight polygonate ornamentation on the notogaster and in the anogenital region; and the number of setae on some leg segments (it'' of tarsus I present versus absent; l' of trochanter III present versus absent).
Etymology The species name grandensis refers to the island of origin, Grande Terre.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Trhypochthoniellus grandensis
Ermilov, Sergey G. & Mary, Nathalie J. 2025 |
Trhypochthoniellus grandensis
Ermilov & Mary 2025 |
T. malaconothroiformis
Ermilov, Hugo-Coetzee & Theron 2017 |