Talaromyces taiwanensis K. W. Cheng & H. A. Ariyaw., 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.16.155308 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15785890 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/36206A46-EE1B-5423-A3D6-251729ECA32B |
treatment provided by |
by Pensoft |
scientific name |
Talaromyces taiwanensis K. W. Cheng & H. A. Ariyaw. |
status |
sp. nov. |
Talaromyces taiwanensis K. W. Cheng & H. A. Ariyaw. sp. nov.
Fig. 20 View Figure 20
Typification.
TAIWAN • Wanrung Township , Hualien County, 23°42'40.3"N, 121°24'48.2"E, serpentine soil in rice field, 2 nd November 2022, K. W Cheng, holotype, NTUPPMH 22-219 (Permanently preserved in a metabolically inactive state), ex-holotype NTUPPMCC 22-275 , ex-isotype NTUPPMCC 22-273 to 274, 276 to 285 GoogleMaps .
Etymology.
Named after Taiwan, the country where the type specimen was collected.
Description.
Sexual morph undetermined. Asexual morph Conidiophores arose from aerial hyphae, or roping hyphal aggregations, hyaline, smooth but some slightly rough, straight, most mono-verticillate or bi-verticillate, occasionally formed subterminal side branches of mono-verticillate, 5–130 µm. Metulae 10.5–16.5 µm × 2.8–3.2 µm. Phialides most 3–5, flask-shaped, 8.2–15.6 µm × 2.0–2.8 µm, rarely mono-phialides up to 18.2 µm × 3.5 µm. Conidia globose to subglobose, few pyriform, rough surfaces and walls, hyaline in immature, pale green to green in mature, 3.3–4.6 µm × 2.9–4.0 µm (x ̄ = 3.8 × 3.5 µm, L / W ratio = 1.1, n = 50).
Medium dependent growth in 7 / 14 days at 25 ° C (mm).
• CYA 13–15 / 30 – 33; CYAS No growth; MEA 58–60 / 80 – 85; OA 48–50 / 88 – 90; PDA 52–57 / 72 – 75; YESA 37–40 / 65 – 72.
Temperature dependent growth in 7 days (mm).
• CYA / MEA 20 ° C 30–32 / 38 – 40; 30 ° C 19–21 / 55 – 58; 37 ° C 15–16 / 25 – 28.
Culture characteristics.
CYA, 25 ° C, 14 days, obvious sulcate, margin entire, floccose, sporulation none, pale gray to beige at center, soluble pigments absent, exudates clear small droplets; reverse in yellowish brown and caramel at center. MEA, 25 ° C, 14 days, margin slightly irregular and beige, floccose to funiculose, sporulation dense, grayish-green, soluble pigments absent, exudates clear droplets; reverse in cream-buff. OA, 25 ° C, 14 days, margin entire and beige, floccose to funiculose, sporulation dense, olive green, soluble pigments absent, exudates clear small droplets; reverse in buff. PDA, 25 ° C, 14 days, margin entire and whitish, floccose to funiculose, sporulation dense, green, soluble pigments absent, exudates clear droplets; reverse in cream-buff. YESA, 25 ° C, 14 days, margin slightly irregular, floccose, sporulation moderately dense, warm beige, soluble pigments absent, exudates clear small droplets; reverse in warm beige to copper brown.
Notes.
Talaromyces taiwanensis forms a strongly supported clade (100 % / 0.99) with its sister species T. californicus and T. louisianensis in the multi-locus phylogeny (Fig. 19 View Figure 19 ). The ex-type strain of T. taiwanensis ( NTUPPMCC 22-275 ) shows over 98.5 % sequence similarity across the ITS, rpb 2, and tub 2 regions when compared to the ex-type strains of T. californicus ( NRRL 58168 ) and T. louisianensis ( NRRL 35823 ). However, a small genetic variation is observed in the cmd A region, where T. taiwanensis exhibits 97.6 % identity (325 / 333 bp, including 1 gap) to these sister species. Morphologically, T. taiwanensis displays conidial structure similar to T. californicus characterized by mono-verticillate and single phialides, a rare phenotypic feature in the T. sect. of Talaromyces (Fig. 20 View Figure 20 ; Peterson and Jurjevic 2019). However, T. taiwanensis NTUPPMCC 22-275 formed smaller conidia to its phylogenetically closely related species T. californicus and T. louisianensis (x ̄ = 3.0–5.0 µm × 3.0–4.0 µm versus 4.0–6.0 µm × 4.0–7.0 µm and versus 3.5–5.0 µm × 3.5–5.0 µm). Furthermore, T. taiwanensis demonstrates significantly slower growth (13–15 mm) compared to T. californicus (25–40 mm) and T. louisianensis (35–39 mm) and lacks sporulation on CYA ( Peterson and Jurjevic 2019). Furthermore, these two species were isolated from air in USA and our samples were from serpentine soil in Taiwan ( Peterson and Jurjevic 2019).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |