Steirodon (Posidippus) major Gorochov, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.31610/trudyzin/2025.329.1.13 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF2A2F-5F60-976F-FF7A-FB37F22FF9BD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Steirodon (Posidippus) major Gorochov |
status |
nom. nov. |
Steirodon (Posidippus) major Gorochov View in CoL nom. nov.
( Figs 34 View Figs 24–37 , 65–67 View Figs 58–73 )
= Posidippus validus Saussure et Pictet, 1898 , junior secondary homonym of Steirodon (Steirodon) validum Stål, 1874 .
= Steirodon (Posidippum) stalii : Emsley (1970).
Material. MEXICO: 2 males, Chiapas State, Ocosingo Distr. near Guatemala, Selva Lacandona (between Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve and Bonampak Natural Monument), environs of Lacanja-Chansayab Vill., primary forest, at light, 20–27 May 2007, M. Berezin, E. Tkacheva ( ZIN) .
Note. Emsley (1970) assumed that Posidippus stalii was collected in the northern part of Brazil ( Brunner-Wattenwyl 1878: “San Francisco in Brazilien”), and he synonymized it with Posidippus validus described from Nicaragua and distributed from Central America to possibly the northern Brazil. For the southern part of Brazil (anoth- er zoogeographical region), he described a similar species, S. (Posidippum) dentiferoides . After Emsley (1970: p. 166), one of differences between these species as well as between them and S. (P.) dentiferum (these three species are most similar to each other) is following: pronotum in S. (P.) dentiferum and S. (P.) dentiferoides has a median denticle on the anterior pronotal edge, but in the third (northern) species, this denticle is absent. However, this character is distinctly developed only in S. (P.) dentiferum (as well as in S. dohrni with distinctly narrower tegmina and in a new species; Figs 59, 62 View Figs 58–73 ), but in S. (P.) dentiferoides paratypes (judging by their photographs in OSF), this denticle is less distinct and may look exactly as in one of my Mexican males ( Fig. 65 View Figs 58–73 ) (my other Mexican male lacks this denticle; Fig. 66 View Figs 58–73 ); thus, this character cannot help to distinguish the Central American species from S. (P.) dentiferoides . The other differences after Emsley are in the tegminal stridulatory apparatus structure (the stridulatory vein in the northern species is about 3.5 mm in length and with 45–49 ventral teeth, and this vein in S. dentiferum and S. dentiferoides is about 4 and 4.5 mm in length as well as with 54–62 and approximately 85 such teeth, respectively), but Posidippus stalii was described from a female only, and recently its type locality was corrected as “São Francisco” in “ Brazil Southeast” ( OSF). So: the latter name belongs to a species living in a zoogeographical region quite distant from Central America, this species cannot be distinguished from S. (P.) dentiferoides also distributed in this southern region, and in this connection, it is reasonable to consider S. (P.) stalii as a senior synonym of S. (P.) dentiferoides . Moreover, the name Posidippus validus Saussure et Pictet was correctly proposed for the northern species, but this name is a junior secondary homonym of Steirodon validum Stål (an older name for a species from the nominotypical subgenus), and for the above-mentioned northern species, I here establish a new replacement name instead of P. validus .
ZIN |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, Zoological Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.