Ochlerus profanus BREDDIN, 1910
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.21248/contrib.entomol.65.2.213-222 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15505450 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/957D9D03-FFD7-FFFE-FCBE-40BF034E0A3F |
treatment provided by |
Luisschmitz |
scientific name |
Ochlerus profanus BREDDIN, 1910 |
status |
|
3.1.9. Ochlerus profanus BREDDIN, 1910 (pp. 619–620)
(figs 10, 25)
Type material (examined): Female, here designated as lectotype, deposited at the SDEI; ‘ Peru Amaz. | coll. Breddin | DEI Müncheberg HEMI-00029’ . 1 female, here designated as paralectotype, ‘ Bahia Felder 853 | marginatus det. Stal | coll. Breddin | DEI Müncheberg HEMI-00016’ .
Type locality: Marcapata, Peru.
Comments: Out of the examined specimens from the SDEI collection, three were determined to either belong to O. profanus or O. rusticus . Two of these have the same locality labels (i.e. ‘Peru, Amaz.’) and would fit with the type locality of O. profanus , as described by BREDDIN (1910). However, upon close inspection of the genitalia and general morphology, it is clear that these two specimens are not conspecific, with one of them (collection label HEMI-00029) matching Breddin’s description of O. profanus and the second (collection label HEMI-00023) matching that of O. rusticus , even though GAEDIKE (1971) labeled it as O. profanus . The third specimen (collection label HEMI-00016) also fits with the description of O. profanus , but is labeled as provenient from Bahia, Brazil. Thus, our conclusion on this matter is that the paralectotype of O. profanus likely had its labels changed with the lectotype of O. rusticus . However, we decided on keeping the labels in the same specimens and simply added new labels with our identification. Type specimens for O. profanus var. praetextatus were not found.
DEI |
Germany, Muencheberg, Deutsches Entomologisches Institut im ZALF |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |