Nanosesarma batavicum ( Moreira, 1903 )

Trivedi, Vinay P. Padate Krupal J Patel Chandrashekher U. Rivonker Jigneshkumar N., 2022, On Indian species of Nanosesarma Tweedie, 1950 (Decapoda: Brachyura: Sesarmidae), Nauplius (e 2022031) 30, pp. 1-18 : 5-7

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2022031

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B44C6E19-FFF4-FFE5-FCF1-C706FC27F80F

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Nanosesarma batavicum ( Moreira, 1903 )
status

 

Nanosesarma batavicum ( Moreira, 1903) View in CoL

( Figs. 1B View Figure 1 , 3 View Figure 3 , 7C, D View Figure 7 )

Sesarma barbimana View in CoL — De Man,1890:104,pl. 6, fig.13. Sesarma batavica Moreira, 1903: 117 View in CoL (nom. nov.). —

Tweedie, 1940: 90, fig. 1.

Sesarma batavicum — Kemp, 1915: 238, pl. 12, fig. 7.

Sesarma (Parasesarma) batavica View in CoL — Tweedie, 1936: 62.

Nanosesarma batavica View in CoL — Tweedie, 1950: 311.

Nanosesarma (Beanium) batavicum View in CoL — Serène and

Soh, 1970: 394.

Material examined. 1 male (CL: 4.8 mm, CW: 6.6 mm), GUMSIS1, India, Goa , Verem (15°29’74”N 73°48’20”E), coll. Mithila Bhat, 9 April 2014 .

Description. Carapace quadrangular, 1.35 times wider than long, with slightly concave, converging lateral margins; dorsal surface covered with scattered pits, prominent setal tufts on postfrontal lobes, protogastric and anterior branchial regions, and sparsely placed setae on posterior half of carapace. External orbital tooth triangular. Several oblique, low, setose granulated striations extending across branchial regions ( Figs. 1B View Figure 1 , 3A View Figure 3 ). Frontal lobes separated by shallow depression; 4 inconspicuous post-frontal lobes covered with setose patches, separated by longitudinal grooves ( Fig. 3A View Figure 3 ).

Third maxillipeds with distinct rhomboidal gap when closed; ischium subrectangular, 1.17 times longer than wide, 1.59 times longer than merus, with oblique setose ridge; merus subovate, 0.89 times longer than wide, with oblique setose ridge. Exopod slender, flattened, with long flagellum ( Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ).

Right cheliped massive, longer than carapace; palm massive ( Fig.3C View Figure 3 ), surfaces rugose, dorsal surface with 2 oblique pectinate crests and 5 or 6 oblique granular ridges ( Fig. 3D View Figure 3 ); outer surface smooth, slightly pitted, thin granular line on lower half commencing on pollex and extending posteriorly to carpal junction; inner surface sparsely granulated. Fingers massive, curved, with rounded spatulate tips, gaping when closed, outer surface with dense setose patch. Male dactylus with row of 12 prominent transverse ridges, proximal granules and scattered setae on dorsal surface; inner surface with proximal granular, setose patch. Cutting edges of dactylus and pollex with 4 subequal blunt teeth each ( Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ).

P2–5, compressed, shorter than chelipeds. P2 and P5 short, P3 and P4 subequal. P2 and P3 propodi and carpi densely setose on anterior surface, P4– P5 propodi and carpi without dense setae. P2–P5 propodi posterior margins with one distal spine, ventral surface with inconspicuous oblique groove. P5 dactylus smooth, tip corneous, slightly curved, dorsal margin with six spines, ventral margin with three pairs of spines ( Fig. 3E View Figure 3 ).

Male pleon bluntly triangular (AW/CW = 0.38), surface pitted, sutures with sparsely setose patches; lateral margins finely granulated, densely setose; telson 1.04 times as long as wide, 1.88 times as long as pleomere 6 ( Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ).

G1 long, straight, distal part corneous, slender, f lattened, slightly bent,lined by thick bristles, groove at base of tip extends along ventral surface to proximal portion of G1 ( Fig. 7C, D View Figure 7 ).

Remarks. The specimen examined in the present study agrees with the description by De Man (1890) but differs in having 6 oblique granular ridges on dorsal surface of male cheliped propodus (vs. 7 or 8 in the holotype), and 4 occlusal teeth on pollex (vs. 3 in the holotype). Morphological comparison with other Indian species is provided in Tab. 1.

Geographical distribution. Nanosesarma batavicum was originally described from Batavia, Indonesia and later reported from Java, Malaysia, Singapore, ( Tweedie, 1950) and India ( Trivedi et al., 2018). In India, it is known from Goa (present study), Kerala ( Devi et al., 2015), Tamil Nadu ( Varadharajan and Soundarapandian, 2014), and Odisha ( Dev Roy and Rath, 2017).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Sesarmidae

Genus

Nanosesarma

Loc

Nanosesarma batavicum ( Moreira, 1903 )

Trivedi, Vinay P. Padate Krupal J Patel Chandrashekher U. Rivonker Jigneshkumar N. 2022
2022
Loc

Nanosesarma batavica

Tweedie MWF 1950: 311
1950
Loc

Sesarma (Parasesarma) batavica

Tweedie MWF 1936: 62
1936
Loc

Sesarma batavicum

Kemp S 1915: 238
1915
Loc

Sesarma barbimana

Moreira C 1903: 117
De Man JG 1890: 104
1890
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF