Mucuna? wertheimii Burck
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3767/000651916X692799 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DEE569-FFF6-FFE1-1A7D-FA455B3EF873 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Mucuna? wertheimii Burck |
| status |
|
Mucuna? wertheimii Burck View in CoL
Mucuna? wertheimii Burck (1893) View in CoL 188, pl. 14, f. 2. — Type: Exped. Neerl. s.n., Key Islands (n.v.).
The species was described after a fruiting specimen from the Key Islands. The pod in the drawing accompanying the description looks very similar to a Dioclea View in CoL -pod, not much different from those of D. hexandra View in CoL .
In Kew I have seen a photograph annotated as: Mucuna cf wertheimii Burck , cult. Hort. Bog. XVIII.D.10, fl. 8.XI. 1910. Fl. auran- tiacum rubri (orange red). According to Verdcourt not Mucuna bennettii , warburgii , elegans , etc. The flowers of Mucuna? wertheimii are not known. The flowers of Dioclea hexandra are white, pinkish or purplish.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Mucuna? wertheimii Burck
| Wiriadinata, H., Ohashi, H. & Adema, F. 2016 |
Mucuna? wertheimii
| Burck 1893 |