Ipsiura amaurotica ( Linsenmaier, 1985 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5642.6.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B7CA64C-AD05-47CB-B698-D89357A5ECD5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15843097 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AE2DA93D-B528-FFFC-39C4-96CE1D38159D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ipsiura amaurotica ( Linsenmaier, 1985 ) |
status |
|
Ipsiura amaurotica ( Linsenmaier, 1985) stat. resurr.
( Figs 12A–D View FIGURE 12 )
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) amaurotica Linsenmaier, 1985 . Holotype ♂: Brazil: Pará (NMLU, examined).
Ipsiura tropicalis Bohart, 1985: 719 . Holotype ♂: MEXICO: Morelos, Cuernavaca (BME). Synonym of Ipsiura tropicalis Bohart, 1985 according to Kimsey & Bohart (1991: 511); Lucena et al. (2016: 63); Lucena et al. (2024: 42).
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) tropicalis amaurotica : Linsenmaier (1997: 266). Reinstated with subspecific status.
Ipsiura amaurotica ( Linsenmaier, 1997) : present paper: stat. resurr.
Material examined. Holotype of Neochrysis amaurotica , ♂: Brasil Obidos 1.1905 [Ducke] / 397 / ♂ Neochrysis amaurotica Lins. Linsenmaier det. 1985 / ♂ Ipsiura tropicalis amaurotica det. Linsenmaier 1995 / NML_ENT GBIF_ Chr 0013456 ( NMLU).
Neochrysis amaurotica was synonymized by Kimsey & Bohart (1991) with Ipsiura tropicalis Bohart, 1985 , without type examination, and later revalidated as a subspecies by Linsenmaier (1997), who provided a diagnosis and a line drawing to support this action. Lucena et al. (2024) ignored this revalidation and again considered it a synonym of I. tropicalis Bohart, 1985 . We examined the holotype of Neochrysis amaurotica , which differs from I. tropicalis in metasomal sculpture and the structure of the third tergum as described and illustrated by Linsenmaier (1997). The main differences between the two species are the large and spaced punctures and the elongate postpit area of the third tergum in N. amaurotica ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ) vs dense and small punctures on the mesosoma and a short postpit area in I. tropicalis (see Bohart 1985: Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). Both species were described based on males; therefore, the observed differences cannot be attributed to sexual dimorphism. We consider these differences to be sufficient to recognise Neochrysis amaurotica ( Linsenmaier, 1985) stat. resurr. as a valid species. The female specimen illustrated by Lucena et al. (2016: Figs 179–181) corresponds to I. amaurotica ; records from Brazil should be re-evaluated to confirm the occurrence of I. tropicalis in the country.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Chrysidinae |
Tribe |
Chrysidini |
Genus |
Ipsiura amaurotica ( Linsenmaier, 1985 )
Rosa, Paolo & Brothers, Denis J. 2025 |
Neochrysis (Ipsiura) tropicalis amaurotica
Linsenmaier, W. 1997: 266 |
Ipsiura tropicalis
Lucena, D. A. A. & Gomes, R. S. & Zanella, F. C. V. & Almeida, E. A. B. 2024: 42 |
Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. 1991: 511 |
Bohart, R. M. 1985: 719 |