Hemymizon luae, Chen & Yeh, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5550.1.28 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:96E8FBAF-E0D2-4B99-BDE0-DC4761F49B32 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14390387 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD6B03-FFB8-CE65-FF28-44AEFD44FADF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hemymizon luae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Hemymizon luae new species
(ṘOEOiȒẵẘ)
( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 )
Materials examined
Holotype.— NTOUP-2022-10-361 , 72.4 mm SL, coll. I-S. Chen, coll. Oct. 22 2022, Alishan District, Tzengwen River basin , Tainan City, Taiwan .
Paratypes.— NTOUP-2022-10-362 , 9 specimens, 57.8–71.6 mm SL, the collection data same as holotype .
Diagnosis
The new species can be well distinguished from other congeneric species by following combination of features: (1) dorsal fin rays 3 + 8; pectoral fin rays 11–12 + 9–11 (total 20–22; modally 22); (2) pelvic fin moderate large, extending to rear vertical of dorsal fin, pelvic simple rays modally 3 which fewer than any other endemic ones of Taiwan; (3) lateral-line scales 68–72 (modally 70); predorsal scales 39–42 (modally 40); (4) the position of anus with much larger distance of pelvic rear tip to anus about 2.4–3.2 times of that of anus to anal fin origin; and (5) specific coloration: dorsum of body and head olive brown to greenish brown; predrorsal region deep brown with several rounded or oblong cloudy deep brown patches; lateral body uniformly olive brown to deep brown; and pectoral, pelvic and anal fins pale white with deep brown rays.
Description
The morphometrics of this new species as percentages of standard length are listed in Table 1 View TABLE 1 and meristic features are listed in Table 2 View TABLE 2 . Head and body very strongly depressed with flat ventral side anteriorly. Posterior trunk from anus to caudal peduncle rather compressed. See Table 1 View TABLE 1 for morphometric characters. Head with a few tiny tubercles. Upper lip with 9–12 small papillae; no distinct papillae on lower lip except a pair of somewhat crescent projections on inner side. Four rostral barbels and two barbels at both corners of mouth which anterior one similar to length of posterior one. The length of anterior barbels smaller than that of the eye diameter. Interorbital region rather wide. Gill-opening small and very restricted, merely extending above anterior origin of pectoral fin. The location of anus is closer to anal fin origin, with large distance of rear tip of pelvic fin to anus about 2.4–3.2 times to that of anus to anal fin origin.
Dorsal fin 3+8; anal fin 2+5; pectoral fin 11–12 + 9–11 (total rays 20–22; modally 22); pelvic fin 3–4 + 8–9 (simple rays modally 3; branched rays modally 8; total rays 11–13 modally 11). Origin of dorsal fin behind origin of pelvic fin origin. Pectoral fin rather large, its rear margin extending beyond origin of pelvic fin. Pelvic fin well separate, the gap between the attachment of their innermost rays about 2.0–2.5 times of eye diameter; its rear margin extending to the rear tip of dorsal fin when depressed. Caudal fin forked, its lower lobe always longer than upper one.
Dorsal part of body with very small cycloid scales. Larger specimens with reduced, smaller size of predorsal scales. Ventral region between the paired fins naked. Body scales slightly larger posteriorly. Lateral-line scales 69–72 (modally 70) and predorsal scales 39–32 (modally 40).
Coloration in fresh
Dorsum of body and head olive brown to greenish brown. Predrorsal region olive brown to deep brown with several rounded or oblong cloudy deep brown patches with lighter margin. Lateral body uniformly olive brown to deep brown. Ventral side unique pale creamy white. Dorsal fin pale white with deep brown rays with about 2–3 rows of indistinct deep brown spots. Pectoral, pelvic and anal fins pale white with deep brown rays. Caudal fin with broad black outer margin with 3-4 oblique, zigzag creamy white streaks.
Distribution
The new species Hemimyzon luae is merely found from the type locality of upper reaches of Tzengwen River basin, Taiwan. It may be only found in the Tzegnwen River basin, not occurring in others.
Etymology
The specific name, luae is named after the President of Yushan National Park - S.F. Lu, for the honor of her kindly supporting the ecological conservation and biodiversity research and also for all her great contribution for the National Park.
Discussion
In the taxonomy of Hemimyzon , four nonimal species were documented in mainland China ( Yue 2000) while recorded two endemic species of Taiwan (Tzeng & Chen 1982; Shen 1993) before 2000. After then, Chen and Fang (2009) described Hemimyzon sheni from eastern Taiwan added the third endemic species to Taiwan. More recently, Chen, Harefa, Chang & Han (2022) described the fourth species— Hemimyzon yushanensis from southern Taiwan. After the current new species accounted, the island river basins with 5 endemic species of Taiwan which is top diversity rather than others of mainland China. Even the disjunction of geographical distribution of Taiwan and mainland China, we still consider the Chinese species may be convergent adaption to fast running waters but not directly belonging to true defined Hemimyzon species of Taiwan. The more detailed morphological evidence might be needed to clarify the whole generic limitation of the genus.
The new species Hemimyzon luae would be the new discovery of species boundary geographically separating the Hemimyzon formosanus and Hemimyzon yushanensis . Since their high endemicity in Taiwanese waters, the new species H. luae established, this species can be merely found from hill tributaries of the Tzengwen River basin in Tainan City. H. yushanensis can be found at least from Kaoping River basins in Kaohsiung City as well as Pingtung County. Therefore, the update, true range of H. formosanus would be more restricted to further northern regions as all river basins from the Ilan County, Taipei City, New Taipei City, Taoyuan City, Shinchu County, then southward to Charyi City which mainly in the western slope of Central Mountain Ridge. H. taitungensis can be seen from 3 main larger river basins from Hualian to Taitung County. H. sheni can only be seen in Tarchu river basin of Taitung County. Among them, all of them share allopatric distribution pattern without range overlapping.
Among the four congeneric, endemic species of Taiwan, about the differentiation of dorsal fin rays, there are apparently two groups of Hemimyzon in Taiwan. One group is dorsal fin rays 3+7 which now merely seen in wide distributed species, H. formosanus ; another group is dorsal fin rays 3+8 which can be seen in the following three species as H. taitungensis , H. sheni , H. yushanensis as well as H. yushanensis . The 3+8 group only can be seen in eastern Taiwan as both H. taitungensis and H. sheni . H. yushanensis can be only found from the Kaoping River basin originating from southern slope of the Yushan mountain Ridge in southern Taiwan. H. luae can be merely regarded endemic in only one, Tzengwen River basin.
H. luae shares the same dorsal fin ray formula, 3+8 with H. sheni and H. yushanensis as well as H. taitungensis . However, it can be well distinguished from H. taitungensis by the pectoral fin rays 20–22 vs. 25–26; pelvic fin total rays 11 vs. 17. It also can be well distinguished from both H. yushanensis and H. sheni by the lower counts of pelvic fin simple rays modally 3 vs. 4 and its total rays 11 vs. 14. The limited distribution of current species is needed for further formal concern of its ecological conservation issue.
TABLE 1. Morphometry of Hemimyzon luae from southern Taiwan.
Type | H | P | P | P | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SL (mm) | 72.4 | 68.8 | 71.2 | 70.0 | 71.6 |
Lateral head length | 23.5% | 23.4% | 22.1% | 23.8% | 21.3% |
Dorsal head length | 21.7% | 21.2% | 21.5% | 21.9% | 21.0% |
Ventral head length | 12.3% | 14.2% | 12.9% | 13.9% | 12.9% |
Head width | 18.7% | 20.2% | 20.3% | 19.5% | 19.6% |
Snout length | 13.1% | 13.9% | 13.8% | 13.5% | 13.0% |
Eye diameter | 3.0% | 4.4% | 2.8% | 3.2% | 3.0% |
Interorbital length | 10.6% | 11.2% | 11.0% | 10.1% | 10.1% |
Mouth width | 10.8% | 10.0% | 10.1% | 9.9% | 10.7% |
Body width at pectoral fin origin | 18.9% | 19.8% | 18.7% | 19.9% | 19.3% |
Body width at pelvic fin origin | 22.9% | 26.2% | 26.5% | 25.6% | 24.6% |
Body depth at dorsal fin origin | 14.2% | 17.7% | 16.3% | 14.8% | 16.6% |
Caudal peduncle length | 12.5% | 13.5% | 14.8% | 11.0% | 10.8% |
Caudal peduncle depth | 9.5% | 11.0% | 9.9% | 10.0% | 10.8% |
Length of last simple pectoral fin rays | 16.0% | 18.9% | 17.9% | 19.2% | 14.2% |
Pectoral fin length | 33.0% | 36.4% | 32.8% | 35.2% | 32.6% |
Pelvic fin length | 27.2% | 28.0% | 26.9% | 27.4% | 24.8% |
Length of upper caudal fin lobe | 23.7% | 26.6% | 23.1% | 22.7% | 22.8% |
Length of lower caudal fin lobe | 28.1% | 27.6% | 24.3% | 27.6% | 24.6% |
Distance between pelvic fin bases | 8.8% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 8.0% | 8.6% |
Predorsal length | 48.9% | 55.3% | 50.7% | 51.1% | 51.0% |
Prepectoral length | 16.1% | 17.0% | 16.5% | 16.7% | 16.9% |
Distance between pelvic and pectoral fins | 20.8% | 31.5% | 29.6% | 31.6% | 29.4% |
Anal fin base | 6.0% | 7.4% | 7.1% | 6.8% | 7.7% |
Anus to A origin | 3.6% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 3.6% | 3.7% |
Anus to Rear V | 8.9% | 9.0% | 10.6% | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Anus to Rear V / Anus to A origin | 2.45 | 2.35 | 2.88 | 2.49 | 3.23 |
H: Holotype; P: Paratype.
TABLE 2 Comparison of distribution frequency of meristic features from five endemic nominal species of Hemimyzon in Taiwan.
Species | Pectoral fin | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simple rays | Branched rays | total rays | ||||||||||||||||||
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | M | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | M | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | M | |
H. luae n. sp. | 1 | 10 | 3 | - | - | 11.1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | - | - | 10.4 | 1 | 5 | 8 | - | - | - | - | 21.5 |
H. formosanus | 1 | 19 | 12 | - | - | 11.3 | 7 | 18 | 7 | - | - | 10.0 | 1 | 19 | 12 | - | - | - | - | 21.3 |
H. sehni | - | - | - | 3 | - | 13.0 | - | - | 5 | - | - | 11.0 | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | 24.0 |
H. taitungensis | - | - | 1 | 7 | 4 | 13.3 | - | - | 1 | 8 | 3 | 12.2 | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 5 | 25.4 |
H. yushanensis | - | 11 | 7 | 2 | - | 11.6 | 4 | 15 | 1 | - | - | 9.9 | - | - | 13 | 7 | - | - | - | 22.4 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |