Galerita linearis Fedorenko, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.15298/rusentj.34.1.04 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3412B028-FFB5-FF8E-16D2-F8FCFBB8975D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Galerita linearis Fedorenko |
status |
|
11. Galerita linearis Fedorenko , sp.n.
Figs 20 View Figs 19–21 , 40–41 View Figs 32–43 , 61 View Figs 44–65 , 105–107 View Figs 102–107 .
MATERIAL. Holotype ♂ ( ZMMU) labelled: ‘N-Vietnam, 40 km W of/ Cao Bang, Phia Oac Mt. / E-slope, h= 1600– 1800 m / 22º36′27″N 105º52′0″E / 22.V–6.VI.2018 / leg. A. GoogleMaps
Abramov’. Paratypes ( SIEE): ♂, 3♀♀, with same label; 3♂♂, ♀, same data, except for ‘…/ Cao Bang, Phia Oac Mt. / 22º36′30″N 105º52′20″E, h~ 1600–1650 m,/ deciduous forest, 3–11.X./ leg. D. Fedorenko 2018 GoogleMaps ’; ♀ ( ZISP), ‘ NE Vienam, Cao Bang / Prov., Nguen Binh / Distr., Quang Thanh / vill. 4–13. V .[19] 98 N. Orlov’.
DIAGNOSIS. An apterous black species with aedeagus barely different from that of G. tonkinensis ; otherwise distinctive from G. tonkinensis in many characters of external morphology: the elytra with even ridges less developed than the odd ones; their pubescence uneven, sparse along odd ridges, dense and forming narrow longitudinal stripes in even intervals; the elytral apices are slightly sinuate, with the outer angles only a little rounded and thence distinct. Besides, the body is smaller, BL 23.4–25.8 (vs. 25.9–27.3) mm, the head shorter, HL/HW 1.17–1.23 (vs. 1.24–1.37), and the elytra barely short- er and narrower in both male and female ( Tab. 1).
DESCRIPTION. Body ( Fig. 20 View Figs 19–21 ) black and rather shiny, head toward the level of posterior margin of eye without or with a pair of small and vague, slightly oblong, reddish spots. Antennae with basal segments black, antennomeres 3–11 or 5–11 mostly dark reddish-brown (slightly teneral specimens have reddish spots larger and more distinct and antennae reddish brown). Forebody with microsculpture superficial, more distinct toward sides of pronotum.
Head moderately and very densely to confluently punctate and pubescent in basal half, with frontal carina narrow and short, reaching the level of eye mid-length or shorter, impression on vertex very shallow to nearly indistinct.
Pronotum broadest mostly two fifths from apex, parallel-sided in front of base or with sides slightly diverging toward basal angles, these blunt, right or slightly acute. Base truncate, apex slightly sinuate and straight at middle; apical angles slightly rounded and a little projecting. Disc moderately convex, rather finely and confluently punctate, rugose-punctate along base and along sides in apical third. Median line fine yet more or less impressed, obliterate in basal and apical sixths. Basolateral foveae in form of finely impressed lines traceable in basal half, each extended into a more shallow sublateral line that almost reaches apex, or these two interrupted medially.
Elytral apices obliquely truncate and angulate combined, straight or slightly sinuate inside outer angles, often sinuous due to sutural angles truncate or rounded in addition, outer angles distinct, obtuse and blunt or narrowly rounded; sutural angles acute and sharp or with extreme apices truncate and thence straight to slightly obtuse. Pubescence yellow, forming two irregular rows of dense and fairly long setae on each side of even ridge, thus forming narrow longitudinal stripes, combined with shorter and sparse one-row setae on each side of odd ridge. Interval 3 with 4–5 discal setae, rarely with three on one side; odd intervals with multiple, much shorter, erect setae.
Aedeagus ( Figs 40–41 View Figs 32–43 , 61 View Figs 44–65 , 105–107 View Figs 102–107 ) very similar to that of G. tonkinensis : left paramere oblong subrectangular, parallel-sided, with apex obliquely truncate, to subtriangular, with dorsal margin more rounded toward a moderately rounded apex. Internal sac with one left and two right laterobasal bulbs, with eight dorsomedial and 3–4 left lateral sclerites; most proximal of left sclerites long, curved, situated at apex of left laterobasal bulb.
DISTRIBUTION. Known from the type locality only.
NAME. Refers to the elytral pilosity in form of longitudinal fasciae.
HABITATS AND HABITS. The specimens were collected either by hands or by pitfall-trapping in cloudy forests.
COMMENTS. The new species is very similar to G. tonkinensis in the shape and structure of the internal sac of the aedeagus. This could argue for subspecies status of the two taxa, but for many non-genital morphological differences observed and the recorded localities of either species far apart, with no transitional populations being discovered as yet. Another similar species is G. chinensis Hovorka, 2019 , from the eastern Guanxi in South China. Besides similar facies, it has endophallic sclerites similar in number, eight dorsomedial and four left lateral ones. However, the left paramere is different in shape due chiefly to its apex pointed, the elytral ridges equally developed, and the two close localities recorded are much east to those of G. linearis sp.n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |