Caridina mongziensis Liang, Yan and Wang, 1987
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930150215341 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10237875 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F4878A-FA39-7E70-C81D-FD258BD836E7 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Caridina mongziensis Liang, Yan and Wang, 1987 |
status |
|
Caridina mongziensis Liang, Yan and Wang, 1987 View in CoL
Caridina mongziensis Liang, Yan and Wang, 1987: 133 View in CoL , figures 1-9 View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG View FIG (type locality: Mengzi County, Yunnan).
Material examined
HOLOTYPE: ♀, cl. 6.8 mm ( SFU-77-40-1 ), Mengzi County, Yunnan, 1977 .
PARATYPE: One, ♂ cl. 6.6 mm ( SFU-77-40-2 ), data same as holotype.
Diagnosis
Rostrum short, reaching to middle of second segment or end of antennular peduncle. Rostral formula: 5-7 (mode 6) + 4-6/1-4 (mode 3), anterior half of dorsal margin unarmed. Antennular peduncle 0.5 times as long as carapace. Carpus of first pereiopod 1.8-2.3 times as long as high, chela 2.2-2.4 times as long as broad. Carpus of second pereiopod 4.4-4.9 times as long as high, chela 2.7 -3.0 times as long as broad. Propodus of third pereiopod 3.2-3.4 times as long as dactylus, dactylus with six spinules. Propodus of fi fth pereiopod 4.0-4.1 times as long as dactylus, dactylus with 35-40 spinules. Endopod of male first pleopod rectangular, 3.0 times as long as wide, appendix interna reaching slightly beyond distal end of endopod. Appendix masculina with two rows of strong spines; appendix interna short, about 0.25 times as long as appendix masculina. Uropodal diaeresis with 13-18 teeth. Egg size 1.35- 1.59 ✕ 0.93-1.07 mm in diameter.
Habitat
Unknown.
Distribution
Mengzi County, Yunnan ( figure 1 View FIG ).
Remarks
Considering the form of the rostrum and the structure of the sexual appendages, Caridina mongziensis closely resembles C. yunnanensis and C. disparidentata . Caridina mongziensis can be distinguished from C. yunanensis by the longer dactylus of the third pereiopod (propodus 3.2-3.4 times as long as dactylus vs 4.0-4.5 times in C. yunnanensis ) and the shorter appendix masculina (one-quarter as long as appendix interna vs one-third in C. yunnanensis ). Caridina mongziensis can be distinguished from C. disparidentata by the carpus of the second pereiopod being 4.4-4.9 times as long as high (vs 3.7-4.2 times in C. disparidentata ), the propodus of the third pereiopod being 3.2-3.4 times as long as the dactylus (vs 3.4-3.8 times in C. disparidentata ), the propodus of the fi fth pereiopod being 4.0-4.1 times as long as the dactylus (vs 3.5-3.9 times in C. disparidentata ), and the endopod of the male first pleopod being 3.0 times as long as wide (vs 3.5 times in C. disparidentata ).
The epiphet mongziensis was incorrectly adopted by the original description after the type locality━Mengzi County ( Liang, Yan and Wang, 1987). Since the name, Caridina mongziensis , has been used more than once in the original description, we thus, follow the code ( ICZN, 1985) to retain the name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Caridea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Caridina mongziensis Liang, Yan and Wang, 1987
Cai, Y. & Ng, P. K. L. 2010 |
Caridina mongziensis
LIANG, X. & YAN, S. & WANG, Z. 1987: 133 |