Caenochrysis scyphiphora ( Linsenmaier, 1984 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5642.6.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B7CA64C-AD05-47CB-B698-D89357A5ECD5 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AE2DA93D-B539-FFE3-39C4-935F1D0E1469 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Caenochrysis scyphiphora ( Linsenmaier, 1984 ) |
status |
|
Caenochrysis scyphiphora ( Linsenmaier, 1984) stat. resurr.
( Figs 2B, E, H View FIGURE 2 )
Chrysis (Trichrysis) scyphiphora Linsenmaier, 1984: 223 . Holotype ♀; Brazil: Santa Catarina (NMLU, examined). Synonym of
Caenochrysis parvula ( Fabricius, 1804) according to Kimsey & Bohart (1991: 304); Lucena et al. 2024: 20. Caenochrysis scyphiphora ( Linsenmaier, 1984) : present paper: stat. resurr.
Material examined. Holotype of Chrysis scyphiphora , ♀: Brasilien, Nova Teutonia 27°11’B–52°23’L Fritz Plaumann I.1960 300-500m / ♀ Type Chrysis L. scyphiphora Lins. Linsenmaier det. 1973 / NML_ENT GBIF_ Chr0041389 ( NMLU). Allotype: ♂: Brasilien, Nova Teutonia 27°11’B–52°23’L Fritz Plaumann 6.X.1960 300- 500m / NML_ENT GBIF_Chr0041390 ( NMLU). Paratype: 1♀: Brasilien, Nova Teutonia 27°11’B–52°23’L Fritz Plaumann 15.II.1969 300-500m / NML_ENT GBIF_Chr0041388 ( NMLU).
Chrysis scyphiphora Linsenmaier, 1984 was synonymized with Caenochrysis parvula ( Fabricius, 1804) together with Chr. chrysofacialis and Chr. turmalina by Kimsey & Bohart (1991).
Caenochrysis scyphiphora can be differentiated from Cae. parvula by the coarse punctation on the mesosoma ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ); the metasomal sculpture with wide interspaces ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ); the second tergum fully punctate, with sparse punctures on the posterior half ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ); the apical margin of the third tergum rounded laterally ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ); whereas in Cae. parvula the punctation on the mesosoma is relatively dense and uniform ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ); the first tergum is fully punctate ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); the second tergum has a wide, impunctate longitudinal median stripe ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); and the apical margin of the third tergum is distinctly tridentate, with two small, acute lateral angles ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ).
Caenochrysis scyphiphora can be differentiated from Cae. turmalina by the coarse punctation on the mesosoma ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ) and the elongate black spots on the second sternum ( Fig. 2H View FIGURE 2 ), whereas in Cae. turmalina the mesosomal punctures are small and sparse ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ) and the black spots on the second sternum are ovoid and apically convergent ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ).
Pending a revision of all of the species synonymized with Cae. parvula , based on the different sculpture, shape of the apical margin of the third tergum and of the black spots on the second sternum, we consider Caenochrysis scyphiphora ( Linsenmaier, 1984) stat. resurr. a valid species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Caenochrysis scyphiphora ( Linsenmaier, 1984 )
Rosa, Paolo & Brothers, Denis J. 2025 |
Caenochrysis parvula ( Fabricius, 1804 )
Lucena, D. A. A. & Gomes, R. S. & Zanella, F. C. V. & Almeida, E. A. B. 2024: 20 |
Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. 1991: 304 |
Chrysis (Trichrysis) scyphiphora Linsenmaier, 1984: 223
Linsenmaier, W. 1984: 223 |