Brevitubus lunatus, Zhu & Liao & Yin & Xu, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2AEF30EC-BCE0-4A0D-8793-3CCDF0C6176B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15562630 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D766C41B-FFC4-FF9C-F4DC-6D88B2D4F949 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Brevitubus lunatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Brevitubus lunatus sp. nov. (šnSŝe)
Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 , 8 View FIGURE 8
Type material. China • ♂ holotype; Guangxi, Laibin City, Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County, Shengtangshan Scenic Area ; 23°58'03"N, 110°06'31"E; 1523 m a.s.l.; 11 Oct. 2021; A.L. He, J.X. Liu, Z.G. Huang, R.R. Liao, Q. Li, X.M. Yang, Y.L. Wen, Z. Ye, and Y. Liu leg.; HNU605 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The species epithet is the Latin word, “ lunatus ”, meaning “crescent-shaped”, in reference to the shape of the retrolateral tibial apophysis; adjective.
Diagnosis. Male of the new species is similar to that of B. subpinglong sp. nov. in having a U-shaped sperm duct, palm-shaped membranous conductor, and short and small embolus (compare Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 C−F with Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 C−F), but it can be distinguished by the shape of RTA with an additional branch besides a relatively short distal end in the new species, while RTA with a long distal end and without any additional branch in B. subpinglong sp. nov. (compare Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 C−F with Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 C−F).
Description. Male (holotype): total length 3.49, carapace 1.57 long, 1.36 wide; abdomen 1.83 long, 1.08wide. Carapace brown, with a conspicuous chrysanthemum-petal-shaped pattern ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Cervical groove and radial furrow integrating into the pattern of carapace. Fovea dark red, longitudinal. AER and PER recurved. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.09, PME 0.10, PLE 0.10, AME−AME 0.03, AME−ALE 0.01, PME−PME 0.08, PME−PLE 0.04, ALE−PLE 0.09, AME−PME 0.07, ALE−ALE 0.40, PLE−PLE 0.57. CH 0.06. Chelicera with 3 promarginal and 2 retromarginal teeth. MOA 0.22 long, anterior width 0.22, posterior width 0.28. Leg measurements: I 6.25 (1.48, 0.52, 1.90, 1.48, 0.87); II 5.00 (1.10, 0.47, 1.45, 1.15, 0.83); III 4.39 (1.07, 0.35, 1.04, 1.19, 0.74); IV 6.63 (1.70, 0.47, 1.68, 1.82, 0.96); Leg formula: 4123. Leg spination: Femur I pv1-1-1-1, II pv1-1-1; Tibia I v2-2-2- 2-2-2-2, II v2-2-2-2-2-2; Metatarsus I v2-2-2-2, II pv1-1-1-1, rv1-1-1. Abdomen oval. Dorsum almost black except for a short white stripe located at the posterior end ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Venter light-yellow, with 2 black longitudinal stripes and 1 black patch anterior to spinnerets, and with 1 additional light brown patch centrally ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ).
Palp. Femur with a distinct protrusion ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ). RTA very strong in retrolateral view ( Fig. 4F View FIGURE 4 ), with two apices in prolateral view ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ), and with a sharp distal end and a basal apophysis with two tiny apices in dorsal view ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Tegular apophysis triangular. Sperm duct distinct, U-shaped (forming about a three-quarter circle), occupying ~1/3 length of tegulum. Embolus small and short. Conductor membranous, longitudinally elongated and supporting the base of embolus ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ).
Distribution. Known only from the type locality in Guangxi, China ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ).
Note. Although DNA sequences could not be successfully obtained for this new species, its morphological characteristics strongly support its placement within the new genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |