Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) semifuscipennis Girault, 1911

Triapitsyn, Ś. Serguei V., 2018, Review of the Palearctic Aphelinoidea (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), with focus on the species described by Ś. Nowicki, Israel Journal of Entomology 48 (2), pp. 33-81 : 65-68

publication ID

9E1FF138-217E-47DE-9350-84FC04921313

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9E1FF138-217E-47DE-9350-84FC04921313

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15816723

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F687C4-5C7D-3646-4C2E-FF37426BFE2A

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) semifuscipennis Girault, 1911
status

 

Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) semifuscipennis Girault, 1911 View in CoL

( Figs 60–67)

Aphelinoidea semifuscipennis View in CoL ­Girault,­1911:­4–6.­Type­locality:­Centralia,­ Illinois,­ USA.­Lectotype­ ♀ ­ [INHS], designated by Frison 1927: 224, examined ( Trjapitzin 1995).

Aphelinoidea semifuscipennis variety allipes Girault, 1914: 328 View in CoL . Type locality: Río Piedras , San Juan, Puerto­Rico­( USA).­Syntypes­ 8♀ ­ 1♂ ­[USNM],­not­examined.­Listed­as­a­synonym­of­ A. semifuscipennis View in CoL by Doutt & Viggiani 1968: 530.

Aphelinoidea semifuscipennis Girault View in CoL : Girault 1912: 296 (discussion); Doutt & Viggiani 1968: 530 (illustrations, list); Walker et al. 2005: 9 (mentioned), 23 (brief diagnosis).

Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) semifuscipennis Girault View in CoL : Trjapitzin 1995: 302–305 (lectotype information, discussion, key, distribution).

Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) sp. ( semifuscipennis View in CoL [species] group): Pinto 2006: 143 (illustration of fore wing).

Diagnosis: Member of the semifuscipennis species group of the nominate subgenus of Aphelinoidea . Fore wing with marginal vein thickened and stigmal vein very short and often inconspicuous ( Figs 63, 67).

Female. See the key given in the diagnosis of A. gerlingi above. In the specimens from USA, mesosoma brown except propodeum usually contrastingly lighter, pale or yellow ( Fig. 62). Antenna ( Fig. 60) with clava 2.7–3.2× as long as wide, its apical segment 1.5–2.0× length of basal segment; fore wing ( Fig. 63) 2.5–2.8× as long as wide, with basal infuscation on the disc projecting a little beyond apex of venation; hind wing as in Fig. 64; ovipositor 1.6–1.8× length of metatibia.

Male. Antenna ( Fig. 65) with clava 2.4–2.9× as long as wide; fore wing ( Fig. 67) 2.5–2.6× as long as wide, longest marginal seta notably longer than in female, 0.22–0.28× greatest width of wing; genitalia ( Fig. 66) without aedeagal apodemes, as­first­noted­by­Pinto­(2006:­88),­length­94–100­µm.

Material examined (all in UCRC): Russia: ­ 1♀,­ Moscow­ Region,­ Noginsk­ District,­ Fryazevo,­ 13.vi.2002, M.E. Tretiakov. Bermuda: 1♀,­Southampon­ Parish,­ 4­Munro­ Lane,­ 16–24.x.2001,­R.­ Kaufhold. USA: California:­ 1♀,­Fresno­County,­Glenn­Rd.,­ 8.iv.1993,­S.V.­Triapitsyn­(on­ Erodium sp. and Plantago sp. ); Illinois:­ 1♀,­ Centralia,­ 4.ix.1983,­ J.D.­ &­ D.­ Huber;­ 1♀,­ Carl­ Hall­ Park,­ 7.ix.1993,­J.D.­Pinto;­ 1♀,­1­mi.­N­of­Centralia,­Community­Beach­Drive,­near­Old­Reservoir,­ 12–17. ix.1995, S.V. Triapitsyn; Indiana:­ 3♀,­ Posey­ County,­ New­ Harmony,­ 5.ix.1983,­ J.T.­ Huber;­ Missouri:­ 15♀ ­ 1♂,­Wayne­ County,­Williamsville,­ vii.1987 ­ (1♀),­ viii.1987 ­ (7♀),­ 10–26.ix.1987 ­ (2♀),­ x.1987 ­(1♀),­ 16.vii–16.viii.1988 ­(1♀ ­ 1♂),­ 8–31.viii.1988 ­(1♀),­ 1–20.ix.1988 ­(2♀),­J.T.­Becker;­ New Mexico:­4­ ♀,­Hidalgo­ County,­Gray­ Ranch,­Cienaga,­ 31°31.721'N­ 108°52.826'W,­ 7–8.viii.2002,­J.­ George,­M.­Gates;­ 1♂,­Quay­County,­Tecumcari,­ 4.vi.2003,­M.L.­Buffington;­ Oklahoma:­ 2♀ ­ 2♂,­Latimer­County,­Red­Oak,­ vii.1993 ­(1♀ ­ 2♂),­ x.2001 ­(1♀),­K.­Stephan.

Distribution: Mexico (Jalisco) ( Moya-Raygoza et al. 2012, 2014), USA (including Puerto Rico) ( Girault 1911, 1914; Trjapitzin 1995), as well as Bermuda and Russia (new records).

Hosts: Dalbulus elimatus (Ball) ( Moya-Raygoza et al. 2014) and D. maidis (De- Long) in Mexico ( Moya-Raygoza et al. 2012, 2014) ( Cicadellidae ). Its record from Hortensia similis ­(Walker)­( Cicadellidae )­by­De­Santis­(1979)­needs­to­be­ve­rified.­ Aphelinoidea semifuscipennis variety allipes was reared in Puerto Rico from egg clusters of a leafhopper ( Cicadellidae ) (Girault 1914).

Comments: The male originally described by Girault (1911) as A. semifuscipennis was later described by him as A. plutella Girault (Girault 1912) , although mistakenly as a female ( Trjapitzin 1995).

The sole female from the European part of Russia is mostly indistinguishable from­ the­ conspecific­ specimens­ of­ A. semifuscipennis from North America. Its midlobe of the mesoscutum, scutellum, and dorsum of the gaster are ginger-brown, the antenna is pale, and the head is pale with the vertex brown. The antenna ( Fig. 61) has its clava 2.8× as long as wide, and its apical segment is 1.7× length of the basal segment. The fore wing is 2.4× as long as wide, and the ovipositor is 1.6× length of the metatibia.

One unusual male ( USA: Florida, Pinellas County, St. Petersburg, 28.xii.1982, W.A. Gregory, underneath Pinus palustris [UCRC], Fig. 68) may belong to A. semifuscipennis as its has typical genitalia, but its fore wing is notably narrower, 3.2× as long as wide, and the longest marginal seta is about 0.4× greatest width of the wing.

UCRC

University of California, Riverside

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Trichogrammatidae

Genus

Aphelinoidea

Loc

Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) semifuscipennis Girault, 1911

Triapitsyn, Ś. Serguei V. 2018
2018
Loc

Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea)

PINTO, J. D. 2006: 143
2006
Loc

Aphelinoidea semifuscipennis

WALKER, G. P. & BAYOUN, I. M. & TRIAPITSYN, S. V. & HONDA, J. Y. 2005: 9
2005
Loc

Aphelinoidea (Aphelinoidea) semifuscipennis

TRJAPITZIN, S. V. 1995: 302
1995
Loc

Aphelinoidea semifuscipennis

FRISON, T. H. 1927: 224
1927
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF