Adelphe metallica ( Kieffer, 1910 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5642.6.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B7CA64C-AD05-47CB-B698-D89357A5ECD5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15818279 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AE2DA93D-B53C-FFE8-39C4-934C1C0216BD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Adelphe metallica ( Kieffer, 1910 ) |
status |
|
Adelphe metallica ( Kieffer, 1910) View in CoL
Parachrysis metallica Kieffer, 1910: 288 View in CoL . Holotype ♂; Brazil: Pará, Belém, A. Baker. Synonym of Pseudepyris flavipes Ducke, 1903 according to Ducke (1911).
Adelphe metallica View in CoL : Kimsey & Bohart (1991: 86); Kimsey (2008: 161).
Adelphe flavipes View in CoL : Lucena et al. (2024: 7)
Adelphe metallica View in CoL was considered a valid species within the genus Adelphe View in CoL by Kimsey & Bohart (1991), and Kimsey (2008) who revised the Neotropical species and provided diagnostic characters in a key. However, Lucena et al. (2024) synonymized this species again, apparently based on the interpretation by Ducke (1911). We have not personally examined any type material and consider the measurements provided by Kimsey (2008) possibly to reflect intraspecific variability. Nonetheless, further clarification by the authors on their synonymization would have been welcome to better understand their species concept and whether they examined type material or based their interpretation solely on Ducke (1911).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Adelphe metallica ( Kieffer, 1910 )
Rosa, Paolo & Brothers, Denis J. 2025 |
Adelphe flavipes
Lucena, D. A. A. & Gomes, R. S. & Zanella, F. C. V. & Almeida, E. A. B. 2024: 7 |
Adelphe metallica
Kimsey, L. S. 2008: 161 |
Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. 1991: 86 |
Parachrysis metallica
Kieffer, J. J. 1910: 288 |