Sinodromus lanyue, Zhang & Zhang & Zhong, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15625184 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FAD04B00-75A1-5956-A2F3-9A3A4EBABB51 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Sinodromus lanyue |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sinodromus lanyue sp. nov.
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 4 A, B View Figure 4 , 16 View Figure 16 , 17 View Figure 17 , 18 View Figure 18 , 19 View Figure 19 , 20 View Figure 20 , 23 B View Figure 23
Type material.
China: Hubei Province: Holotype • ♂: Xianning City, Xianan District, Hubei University of Science and Technology , the bamboo forest on the hill behind Lanyue Lake; 29.85°N, 114.34°E; 22 March 2023; Y. Zhong & Q. Lu leg. (Inventory number: MGNU -2025-PHISL 001 ) GoogleMaps . Paratypes • 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (Inventory number: MGNU -2025-PHISL 002 ~ 003), the same data as the holotype GoogleMaps .
Other material examined.
1 ♂, 1 ♀ ( YHPHI 008 and YHPHI 009 used for sequencing, GenBank accession numbers in Table 1 View Table 1 ), the same data as the holotype.
Etymology.
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Diagnosis.
Males of the new species are easily distinguished from Sinodromus fujianensis Yao & Liu, 2024 (only congener with described male) by the following combination of morphological characteristics: (1) TA shaped like a cock’s head, with a hump-like, not folded basal apophysis (vs horn-shaped, with a lamellar, folded basal apophysis) (cf. Figs 16 A View Figure 16 , 17 A, B View Figure 17 , 18 A, C, D View Figure 18 and Wang et al. 2024: figs 4 B – E, 5 C, G, I, K); and (2) Con wider than TA, surface relatively smooth (vs narrower than TA, with many scaly serrations) (cf. Figs 16 A View Figure 16 , 17 A, B View Figure 17 , 18 A – D View Figure 18 and Wang et al. 2024: figs 4 B – E, 5 C, G, I, K). Females of the new species resemble those of S. perbrevis Yao & Liu, 2024 in having a similar MS and endogyne but can be recognised by: (1) ET axe-shaped, distinctly widened, wider than midsection of SEF (vs ear-shaped, not widened, nearly as wide as midsection of SEF) (cf. Fig. 19 A, C, E View Figure 19 and Wang et al. 2024: figs 7 C, 8 C); and (2) R oval, close together (vs globular, widely separated) (cf. Fig. 19 B, D View Figure 19 and Wang et al. 2024: fig. 7 D).
Description.
Male ( MGNU -2025- PHISL 001 ). Total length 3.64. Carapace 1.46 long, 1.29 wide. Abdomen 2.29 long, 0.93 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.05, PME 0.03, PLE 0.06, AME – AME 0.16, AME – ALE 0.10, PME – PME 0.23, PME – PLE 0.24, MOQL 0.21, MOQA 0.26, MOQP 0.29, CH 0.15. Sternum 0.87 long, 0.68 wide. Measurements of legs: I 6.03 (1.76, 2.23, 1.56, 1.38, 0.66), II 7.61 (2.18, 1.38, 2.03, 1.78, 0.89), III 4.94 (1.6, 1.67, 1.08, 0.59), IV 5.94 (1.91, 1.95, 1.43, 0.65). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Cheliceral furrow with one promarginal tooth.
Colouration in ethanol (Figs 19 F View Figure 19 , 20 A – C View Figure 20 ). Carapace basically yellow-brown, nearly pear-shaped, ocular region distinctly narrowed, tegument relatively smooth; with three pairs of indistinct, brown, longitudinal stripes, each one including dense black spots: the central pair starting from PLE, extending obliquely at front and vertically at rear, forming a funnel shape, or shaped like capital letter ‘ Y’; the second pair also starting from PLE and extending almost vertically; the third pair running along the edge of the carapace, slightly curved, resembling a pair of parentheses. Chelicerae coloured slightly paler than carapace, cheliceral base with sparse black spots. Sternum uniformly yellowish-white, laterally with many black dots. Endites and labium coloured as cheliceral base, both with dense scopulae on anterior margins. All legs proximally yellowish-white (coxae, trochanters, and femora), distally brown (patellae, tibiae, metatarsi, and tarsi), with many small black dots on dorsal and lateral surfaces, covered by short spines. Abdomen elongate-oval, dorsum brown, clothed with dense hairs and covered by countless black spots, with two pairs of longitudinal, white lines, reaching entire abdominal length: the central pair anteriorly long and widely separated, posteriorly short and convergent, shaped like a tuning fork; the lateral pair running along the edge of the abdomen, almost ascending parallel; ventral abdomen basically yellowish-white, marked with small dense black dots.
Palp (Figs 16 A, B View Figure 16 , 17 A, B View Figure 17 , 18 A – D View Figure 18 ). Tibia relatively long, ~ 2 / 3 of Cy length, with two apophyses arising distally from tibia: VPTA relatively short, ~ 1 / 6–1 / 5 tibia length, subtriangular and nearly erect in ventral view, distinctly curved and dorsally toward posterior part of Te in prolateral view; RTA bifurcated, with a membranous, thumb-like dRTA and a relatively sclerotised, dagger-like vRTA, vRTA relatively long, ~ 1 / 3 tibia length, twice longer than dRTA. Cy ~ 1.9 × longer than wide, basoretrolaterally with an indistinct CP. Te egg-shaped, ~ 1.55 × longer than wide, proximally slightly swollen, prolatero-apically slightly excavated to accommodate Em and Con. SD sinuate, originating at retrolatero-distal portion of Te, proximally aligning clockwise along the tegular retrolateral margin, medially forming a S-shaped SDL in ventral view, with its distal end hidden behind Te and covered by Con, ultimately entering EmB. Em distinctly simplified and small, ~ 1 / 4 Te length, slightly curved, spine-like; EmT sharply pointed and directed retrolatero-distally, terminating at ~ 1 o’clock position. Con weakly sclerotised, with moderate size, ~ 1 / 3 Te length, basally columnar and slightly torqued along its length, apex triangular and terminating at ~ 1 o’clock position, covers Em. TA heavily sclerotised, shaped like a cock’s head, with a hump-like basal apophysis directed anteriorly and a sharp, beak-like apex pointing retrolaterally.
Female ( MGNU -2025- PHISL 002 ). Total length 3.93. Carapace 1.45 long, 1.31 wide. Abdomen 2.66 long, 1.14 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.05, PME 0.03, PLE 0.06, AME – AME 0.19, AME – ALE 0.11, PME – PME 0.28, PME – PLE 0.25, MOQL 0.21, MOQA 0.28, MOQP 0.34, CH 0.17. Sternum 0.88 long, 0.64 wide. Measurements of legs: I 4.73 (1.36, 1.81, 1.16, 0.99, 0.57), II 5.37 (1.64, 1.93, 1.31, 1.14, 0.66), III 4.32 (1.4, 1.50, 0.92, 0.5), IV 5.21 (1.73, 1.76, 1.14, 0.58). Leg formula: II-IV-I-III. Cheliceral furrow with one promarginal tooth. Colouration in ethanol as in males, but body slightly paler (Figs 19 G View Figure 19 , 20 D – F View Figure 20 ).
Epigyne (Fig. 19 A – E View Figure 19 ). Epigynal field slightly wider than long; anterior and lateral margins not rebordered, posterior margin delimited; CD and R obscured through epigynal plate in ventral view. A small, located at antero-lateral part of epigynal plate, divided by anterior keel of MS, represented by two C-shaped depressions; the two depressions separated by ~ five diameters. MS more or less U-shaped, or vase-shaped, broad; anterior keel slightly narrowed, ~ 2 / 5 epigyne width, with distinct edges and delimited to A; medial stem slightly widened, ~ 1 / 2 epigyne width; posterior base nearly as wide as anterior keel; both middle stem and posterior base with indistinct lateral rMS alongside with rSEF. SEF shaped like a pair of parentheses; anteriorly distinctly widened, forming axe-shaped ET; midsection narrowed, with distinct edges and delimited to A; posteriorly widened, rSEF not distinct and alongside with rMS. CO indistinct, located at antero-lateral borders of MS, leading to CD which looped to connect with R. CD relatively short, ~ 1 / 4 epigyne length, with a course forming one loop before entering R. R close together, oval, ~ 1.2 × longer than wide, ~ 1 / 2 epigyne length and 1 / 3 epigyne width; receptacular surface hyaline and smooth, inside pigmented, sclerotised and granular. GM distinctly small, slightly protruding, papilliform, located at the antero-lateral surfaces of R. FD membranous and acicular, moderately long, ~ 2 / 5 of R length, originating from the posterior surface of R, directing antero-laterally.
Distribution.
Known from the type locality in Hubei Province, China (Fig. 23 B View Figure 23 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |