Oberonia bifida Schltr.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2020.65.03.02 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F541C527-FF90-FF97-A470-997B9ED3FF0C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Oberonia bifida Schltr. |
status |
|
Oberonia bifida Schltr. — Fig. 3 View Fig
Oberonia bifida Schltr. in K.Schum. & Lauterb. (1905) 109. — Type: Schlechter 14081 (holo B, lost, single exemplar), on trees in the forests of the Bismarck Mountains, ~ 1000 m.
Oberonia celebica Schltr. (1911b) 23. — Syntype: Schlechter 20474 (B, lost),[Sulawesi, Minahassa,] on trees in the forest of the Gunong Masrang , 1200 m, syn. nov.
Oberonia fissiglossa N. Hallé (1977) 274, carte 73, f. 115. — Type: MacKee 26809 (holo P00081700;flowers originally in alcohol, dry mounted on herbarium sheet),[ New Caledonia,] Ponerihouen , Mt Auoupini, 900–1000 m, syn. nov.
Notes — Oberonia bifida is a fairly common species in the Central and Western Pacific Islands. It is characterised by its caulescent habit with long falcate leaves and orange flowers, acuminate bract, narrow petals, and lip with auricles, small but deep sac, darker orange disc, moderate constriction in mesochile, and bifid epichile.All those characters are shared between the correct name O. bifida , and two synonyms: O. celebica and O. fissiglossa . Schlechter (1911b) described his O. celebica with yellow-brown (= orange) flowers, and did not differentiate it from any other species. Hallé (1977) compared his O. fissiglossa only to O. equitans (G.Forst.) Mutel , and noted the brown buds. The illustrations either from the protologues or by the respective author of the three species show no differences ( Fig. 3a–c View Fig ).
The SEM images ( Fig. 3d–i View Fig ) reveal some variability in the degree of the constriction of the mesochile and the erose tips of the epichile lobes. The specimen in Fig. 3d–e View Fig is somewhat larger than the others, which may be attributable to it having been grown in cultivation. There is natural variability in size, and the less than 10 % difference seems well within natural variability.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oberonia bifida Schltr.
Geiger, D. L. 2020 |
Oberonia fissiglossa N. Hallé (1977)
N. Halle 1977 |
O. fissiglossa
N. Halle 1977 |
O. fissiglossa
N. Halle 1977 |