Oberonia bifida Schltr.

Geiger, D. L., 2020, Studies in Oberonia 8 (Orchidaceae: Malaxideae). Additional 24 new synonyms, a corrected spelling, and other nomenclatural matters, Blumea 65 (3), pp. 188-203 : 190-191

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2020.65.03.02

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F541C527-FF90-FF97-A470-997B9ED3FF0C

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Oberonia bifida Schltr.
status

 

Oberonia bifida Schltr. — Fig. 3 View Fig

Oberonia bifida Schltr. in K.Schum. & Lauterb. (1905) 109. — Type: Schlechter 14081 (holo B, lost, single exemplar), on trees in the forests of the Bismarck Mountains, ~ 1000 m.

Oberonia celebica Schltr. (1911b) 23. — Syntype: Schlechter 20474 (B, lost),[Sulawesi, Minahassa,] on trees in the forest of the Gunong Masrang , 1200 m, syn. nov.

Oberonia fissiglossa N. Hallé (1977) 274, carte 73, f. 115. — Type: MacKee 26809 (holo P00081700;flowers originally in alcohol, dry mounted on herbarium sheet),[ New Caledonia,] Ponerihouen , Mt Auoupini, 900–1000 m, syn. nov.

Notes — Oberonia bifida is a fairly common species in the Central and Western Pacific Islands. It is characterised by its caulescent habit with long falcate leaves and orange flowers, acuminate bract, narrow petals, and lip with auricles, small but deep sac, darker orange disc, moderate constriction in mesochile, and bifid epichile.All those characters are shared between the correct name O. bifida , and two synonyms: O. celebica and O. fissiglossa . Schlechter (1911b) described his O. celebica with yellow-brown (= orange) flowers, and did not differentiate it from any other species. Hallé (1977) compared his O. fissiglossa only to O. equitans (G.Forst.) Mutel , and noted the brown buds. The illustrations either from the protologues or by the respective author of the three species show no differences ( Fig. 3a–c View Fig ).

The SEM images ( Fig. 3d–i View Fig ) reveal some variability in the degree of the constriction of the mesochile and the erose tips of the epichile lobes. The specimen in Fig. 3d–e View Fig is somewhat larger than the others, which may be attributable to it having been grown in cultivation. There is natural variability in size, and the less than 10 % difference seems well within natural variability.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Lycaenidae

Genus

Oberonia

Loc

Oberonia bifida Schltr.

Geiger, D. L. 2020
2020
Loc

Oberonia fissiglossa N. Hallé (1977)

N. Halle 1977
1977
Loc

O. fissiglossa

N. Halle 1977
1977
Loc

O. fissiglossa

N. Halle 1977
1977
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF