Amaranthus viridis, Heldreich, 1899
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.52.52304 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F26687CE-217C-FFA2-FF04-F88061397F81 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amaranthus viridis |
status |
|
24. Amaranthus viridis View in CoL L., Sp. Pl., ed. 2: 1405. 1763. –
Lectotype (designated by Fawcett & Rendle 1914: 131):
Herb. Linn. No. 1117.15 (LINN).
– “ Amaranthus gracilis ” auct. [non Amaranthus gracilis Desf., Tabl. École Bot. View in CoL : 43. 1804 nec Poir. in Lam.,
Encycl. Méthod., Suppl. 1: 312. 1810; see Iamonico 2015b, 2016b].
Remarks — Native from SE Mexico to N Argentina, this species is introduced as a ruderal weed in tropical, subtropical and warm-temperate regions worldwide ( Bayón 2015: 370). An established xenophyte in Greece ( Arianoutsou & al. 2010), it is known from most parts of the country (except North Pindos and North Central, perhaps due to its lacking frost resistance; there are also no records from North Macedonia and Bulgaria, see Iamonico 2015a). It is also given as naturalized in coastal Albania ( Barina & al. 2017; 2018) and European Turkey ( Iamonico 2015a, based on Roy & al. 2022). Unfortunately, the name Amaranthus viridis has been misapplied to A. blitum in influential Greek floras ( Halácsy 1904; Rechinger 1944), which makes previous floristic records doubtful unless specimens are revised. Forms of A. emarginatus , showing an elongate terminal spike-like inflorescence similar to that of A. viridis , differ sufficiently by their smaller, apically emarginate to bilobate leaves and constantly smaller fruit and seed dimensions.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amaranthus viridis
Raus, Thomas 2022 |
Amaranthus gracilis Desf., Tabl. École Bot.
Desf. 1804: 43 |