Porrhomma ozrenense, Komnenov, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5642.2.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EE8EC120-949E-4254-B5B3-A6920E643385 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15576499 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED27879B-FF85-FF89-FF42-0355FBB36115 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Porrhomma ozrenense |
status |
sp. nov. |
Porrhomma ozrenense sp. nov.
Figs 2–16 View FIGURES 2–3 View FIGURES 4–8 View FIGURES 9–11 View FIGURES 12–16
Type material. Holotype ♂ ( NHMW-ZOO-AR-30349 ), BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, Maglaj, Ozren Mt , 438 m a.s.l., Mokra Megara cave , 18.08.2022, leg. M. Komnenov. Paratypes: 1 ♂ ( NHMW-ZOO-AR-30350 ) and 3 ♀♀ (♀ NHMW-ZOO-AR-30351 ; ♀ NHMW-ZOO-AR-30352 ; ♀ NHMW-ZOO-AR-30353 ), same data as holotype .
Diagnosis. The main big difference that immediately distinguishes P. ozrenense sp. nov. from all other European species (except P. frasassianum Weiss & Sarbu, 2021 , P. matevskii Komnenov, 2025 , P. profundum M. Dahl, 1939 and P. rosenhaueri (L. Koch, 1872)) is that it is a troglobite species with eyes extremely reduced in size ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9–11 ). From P. frasassianum , P. matevskii , P. profundum and P. rosenhaueri , the only troglobitic species in Europe characterized so far (Komnenov in press; Růžička 2018), it differs by very distinct morphological differences in male and female genitalia. It can be easily separated from P. frasassianum and P. matevskii , the only eyeless representatives in the genus, by the presence of eyes ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–11 ) and by the different shapes of the velum and the spermathecae in males and females respectively. From P. profundum males differs by the unmodified apical part of the embolus (swollen in P. profundum , see fig. 27B in Růžička 2018) and the females by the different shape of the spermathecae. From P. rosenhaueri males differ by the velum being wider and massive (extremely narrow and minute in P. rosenhaueri , see fig. 53B in Růžička 2018) and the females by the different shape of the appendices and the spermathecae.
The new species is closely related to P. egeria from which it can be distinguished by the triangular and pointed anterior process of the embolic plate (more rectangular in P. egeria cf. Fig. 8 View FIGURES 4–8 vs fig. 21B in Růžička 2018) and by the semi-circular shape of the velum in males (more or less S-shaped in P. egeria , cf. Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 4–8 vs fig. 21B in Růžička 2018). Females of Porrhomma ozrenense sp. nov. can be distinguished from those of P. egeria by the circular atrium of the epigyne (considerably broader than long in P. egeria , cf. Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12–16 vs fig. 21C in Růžička 2018) and by the shape and direction of the appendices being relatively straight and directed towards cuticle in dorsal view (distinctly curved and directed to sides in dorsal view in P. egeria , cf. Figs 13, 15 View FIGURES 12–16 vs fig. 21D-F in Růžička 2018).
Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality—the Ozren Mountain; adjective.
Description. Male holotype. Habitus as in Figs 2 View FIGURES 2–3 , 17 View FIGURES 17–24 . Total length 2.16, prosoma length 1.04, width 0.76, chelicerae length 0.36, abdomen length 1.12 width 0.68. Clypeus and frontal part of carapace with relatively long and thin hairs. Eyes extremely reduced in size, without black rings around.
Color: chelicerae and prosoma dark yellow, legs and opisthosoma grey-white.
Legs long (see Table 1 View TABLE 1 ), ventral side of legs with long setae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–3 ). Femur I with a dorsal spine located at 0.61 and one prolateral spine; femur II only with one dorsal spine, located at 0.46; femur III and IV with no spines. Patella I–IV with a long spine. All tibiae with two dorsal spines, additionally tibia I with one prolateral one retrolateral spine, tibia II with one retrolateral spine. Metatarsi with no spines, metatarsi I–III with trichobothrium, position: I = 0.54, II = 0.40, III = 0.46.
Pedipalp as in Figs 4–9 View FIGURES 4–8 View FIGURES 9–11 . Palpal tibia with two retrolateral and one prolateral trichobothria ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4–8 ). Retrobasal region of cymbium with a short, dome-shaped apophysis (CA) ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4–8 ). Paracymbium hook-like, proximal section covered with relatively short bristles ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4–8 ). Embolus (E) long and curved with broad velum (V), ending above anterior process of embolic plate (AP). Apical edge of velum semi-circular in shape, lower anterior edge of velum forming a long and massive bifurcated tooth (BT), more clearly visible in prolateral view through the transparent anterior extension of embolic plate ( Figs 6, 8 View FIGURES 4–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–11 ). Distal part of embolus surrounded by an embolic membrane (EM), apical edge covered with fine papillae ( Figs 6 −9 View FIGURES 4–8 View FIGURES 9–11 ), anterior process of the embolic plate (AP) barely visible on normal/undissected palp due to its transparency ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 4–8 ), clearly visible with higher magnification ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–11 ) or in dissected embolic division ( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 4–8 ). AP triangular, pointed, ~ longer than wide at its base, directed in same direction as embolus, longitudinal dark mark on upper half ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 4–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–11 ). Distal suprategular apophysis (DSA) fingerlike, projecting distally, visible in retrolateral and prolateral view in undissected palp ( Figs 4, 6 View FIGURES 4–8 ), posterior apex of the embolic plate (PA) triangular with a blunt tip.
Female paratype (NHMW-ZOO-AR-30351). Habitus as in Figs 3 View FIGURES 2–3 , 18 View FIGURES 17–24 . Total length 2.72, prosoma length 1.12, width 0.76, chelicerae length 0.64, abdomen length 1.64, width 1. Clypeus with no setae. Eyes as in the male, distance between posterior median eyes PME-PME = 0.1 ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9–11 ). Leg measurements are given in Table 2 View TABLE 2 . Femur I with a dorsal spine located at 0.68 and one prolateral spine; femur II only with one dorsal spine located at 0.61; femur III with one dorsal spine, femur IV with no spine. Patella I–IV with a long spine. All tibiae with two dorsal spines, additionally tibia I with one prolateral and one retrolateral spine, tibia II with one retrolateral spine. Metatarsi with no spines, metatarsi I-III with trichobothrium, position: I = 0.48, II = 0.47, III = 0.40. Color as in male, but abdomen more whitish ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2–3 ).
Epigyne with circular atrium ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12–16 ), open fish mouth-shaped ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 12–16 ). Anterior plate with V-shaped socket ( Figs 11 View FIGURES 9–11 , 12, 14 View FIGURES 12–16 ). Spermathecae kidney-like, together with appendices visible through the integument ( Figs 11 View FIGURES 9–11 , 12, 14 View FIGURES 12–16 ). Appendices relatively straight and in dorsal view directed towards cuticle ( Figs 13, 15 View FIGURES 12–16 ).
Natural history. Porrhomma ozrenense sp. nov. is extremely rare in the type locality. After eight hours of exploration along the entire length of the cave, only five individuals were observed. They were collected in the deep dark zones of the cave with high humidity, specifically on the floor in waterless areas of the cave and in crevices on the cave walls. This species is a troglobitic spider having extremely reduced eyes and a significant reduction in cuticular pigmentation.
The word “Mokra” in the cave's name, means “wet” in the local language, which further explains the nature of the cave with an underground river flowing through almost its entire length ( Figs. 23, 24 View FIGURES 17–24 ). During heavy rains, the level of the underground river rises to the point that large part of the cave is washed by the flowing water. This may be one of the reasons why this new species is so rarely encountered in the cave. The partial destruction of the wooden platform at the cave's entrance ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17–24 ) further demonstrates the force of the flowing water.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality—Mokra Megara cave on Ozren Mt. in Bosnia and Herzegovina ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Endemism. Probably local endemite.
Conservation remarks. Until the end of 2021, not only was the cave not subjected to any protection measures, but it was also impossible to visit or explore because its entrance was mined during the Bosnian War (1992–1995). Thanks to the initiative of the Citizens' Association "Fojničani" from Maglaj, the cave was demined at the end of 2021 and making it accessible to visitors and researchers. Other nearby speleological sites remain inaccessible because they are still mined.
Due to our limited knowledge of its ecology, P. ozrenense sp. nov. is not directly considered endangered. However, because of its exceedingly small population size and relatively restricted range, it should be regarded as potentially vulnerable in the case of frequent and unprofessional human visits to the cave. Together with the endemic troglobitic beetle Duvalius maglajensis (Apfelbeck, 1908) , which was also described from this cave, P. ozrenense sp. nov. should be added to the list of nationally protected species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |