Parapronematus acaciae Baker, 1965
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.24349/7w23-xsl9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E428AB52-1C1E-FF98-FE22-23648300FCBD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Parapronematus acaciae Baker, 1965 |
status |
|
Parapronematus acaciae Baker, 1965
Parapronematus acaciae Baker, 1965: 116 .
Parapronematus acacia, Gupta 2002: 121 .
The original description of this species is extremely basic, with no measurements or details in the illustration. In the complementary description of Gupta (2002), he used part of the original description and all drawings of the original description, with no new measurements.
The type specimens could not be studied because they could not be loaned; hence, in this publication, the length of setae of the dorsal part of opisthosoma and of tarsus I were estimated
( Table 2) based on the illustrations provided in the original description.
We found the following inconsistencies between the description and the illustrations: tarsus
III is depicted with five setae, instead of six in the description of the genus. Also, according to the original description, “The forked seta of femur IV is at least twice as long as the width of the segment”, but in the illustration, the length of the seta and the width of the segment are similar. For the moment, we retain the genus description with six setae on tarsus III and the estimated setal lengths as distinguishing characteristics and we consider the relative length of the dorsal setae of femora III and IV to the width of the segment as an unreliable characteristic.
However, we are convinced that the species needs a redescription, especially for being the type of the genus.
As distinguishing characters, we retain: f1 49, h1 49 and h2 68, which are clearly longer than in P. camelia , P. formosanus , P. murshidabadensis and P. connarus n. sp. Eupathidia long,
tc″ζ /tarsus I≈ 3.0 but seta p″ζ 34 is shorter than in P. connarus n. sp. (37.5–47.3 µm), tarsus
III with six and tarsus IV with five setae, according to the text of the original description of the genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Parapronematus acaciae Baker, 1965
De VisK, Raf M. J., K, José Dantas Araujo Lacerda, de MoraesK, Gilberto J. & Ueckermann K, Edward A. 2025 |
Parapronematus acacia
Gupta S. K. 2002: 121 |
Parapronematus acaciae
Baker E. W. 1965: 116 |