Stenelmis puberula (Kodada, 2004)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1661.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15609617 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E36187B1-FFD5-FFDA-FF05-FC72D48DFA01 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Stenelmis puberula |
status |
|
Description of the larva of Stenelmis puberula View in CoL .
Habitus ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Length 5.70–6.04 mm, greatest width 0.41–0.84 mm. Dorsal and ventral side subequal in colour, yellow to yellow-brown; head, prothorax, apex of ninth abdominal segment and marginal parts of all thoracic and abdominal segments darkened to brown; legs yellow, distal part of femur and proximal part of tibia darkened. Body elongate, sides subparallel, anteriorly and posteriorly slightly converging; moderately convex dorsally, almost flat ventrally, crescent-shaped in cross-section. Biforous spiracles present laterally on mesothorax and abdominal segments 1–8.
Integument subglabrous, shiny, with two types of setae present: long acuminate setae sparsely and regularly distributed on body in pairs ( Figs 25 View FIGURES 23–31 , 39 View FIGURES 32–42 ) and shorter tufted dense setae (mainly on granulated parts) ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 32–42 ).
Head ( Figs 2–4 View FIGURES 2–11 , 18 View FIGURES 12–22 ) oval in dorsal view, dorsoventrally flattened, prognathous, partially retracted into prothorax, feebly longer than wide; slender subacuminate tooth on anterior margin between base of antenna and clypeus present; frontoclypeal plate feebly grooved, epicranial plates and genae granulated, granules with tufted scales ( Figs 2, 3 View FIGURES 2–11 ). Epicranial sutures well visible, coronal suture short, frontal sutures long, almost straight, extending to base of antennae, frontoclypeal suture present. Stemmata small, clustered into oval black spot. Gula about half as long as labium, microreticulate ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2–11 ). Antenna ( Figs 5–7 View FIGURES 2–11 ) three-segmented; scape widest, subapically with one distinctly long and few shorter tufted setae; pedicel slender, elongate, feebly constricted subapically, almost three times as long as scape; flagellum setiform, apex slightly widened, rounded, with two scale-like sensilla; sensorium subacuminate, slightly shorter than flagellum ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 2–11 ). Labrum short, more than twice as wide as long, rugose, with longer and shorter hairs and tufted scales in anterior half ( Figs 8, 9 View FIGURES 2–11 ); anterior margin ventrally with serrate scales ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 2–11 ); tormae very short, straight, mesally oriented; epipharynx with moderately long, arched, mesally oriented forked scales ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 2–11 ). Clypeus wide, very short; frontoclypeal suture visible. Mandible ( Figs 12, 13 View FIGURES 12–22 ) well developed, palmate, with three oblique subacuminate apical teeth; incisor area with long curved articulated setose process; mola absent; penicillus well developed, consisting of forked scales; outer margin smooth; ventral condyle rounded; ventral side transversally grooved along middle, with small spines near condyle. Maxilla ( Figs 14–18 View FIGURES 12–22 ) slender; cardo small subtriangular, with moderately long branched seta ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 12–22 ); stipes elongate, smooth, only with one long sublateral seta ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 12–22 ) and three short, forked scales ( Figs 14, 15, 17 View FIGURES 12–22 ); outer margin slightly convex; galea and lacinia equally long, flattened, apically with acuminate setae ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 12–22 ); maxillary palpus 4-segmented, about as long as lacinia, segments 1 and 2 shorter, 3 and 4 longer; apical sensory field of distal segment with one longer and several shorter peg-like sensilla ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 12–22 ). Labium elongate, slightly longer than stipes ( Figs 18, 19 View FIGURES 12–22 ). Prementum very short, membranous; ligula glabrous with paired short, acuminate admedian sensilla. Postmentum undivided, glabrous, with few forked scales, small pegs and two long, acuminate lateral sensilla; basal portion of disc with spines; apical angles slightly excavate with elongate pegs ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 12–22 ); labial palpi 2- segmented ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 12–22 ); segment 1 subglobular; segment 2 peg-like with apical sensory field ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 12–22 ). Hypopharynx simple ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 12–22 ).
Thorax. Protergum slightly longer then wide, widest in posterior half; anterior margin feebly arcuate, bearing flat forked scales; posterior margin finely rugose ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–31 ); lateral sides slightly converging anteriad; sublaterally in anterior half with fine depressions (with rimmed setiferous pits) extending to lateral and anterior margin of protergum ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–31 ); anterior half of protergum with 4 pairs of long hair-like setae ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–31 ); posterior angles with microgranulated spots, each with central long fine seta ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–31 ); laterally from spots two additional pairs of setae. Meso- and metatergum wider than long, about half as long as protergum, both with: 1) microreticulate anterior part normally concealed by preceding segment; 2) posterior margin finely rugose; 3) two irregular microgranulate admedian spots with long central seta; 4) in anterior half of terga, each with central long fine seta, laterally from them two additional pairs of setae. Area along sagittal line of all thoracic segments slightly grooved. Posterior margin of meso- and metathorax with row of flat, distally forked scales. Venter of prothorax with: suture between epimeron and sternellum hardly visible; portion anterior to coxae shorter than posterior portion; medial acuminate projection of basisternum short. Venter of meso- and metathorax with large basisternum and distinct laterotergites; basisterna microreticulate in anterior half and glabrous in posterior half; portion behind coxae reduced, membranous ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–31 ). Legs well developed, fivesegmented, relatively long. Fore-legs shortest and robust ( Figs 27, 28 View FIGURES 23–31 ), mid- and hind-legs slender, equal in shape ( Figs 32, 33 View FIGURES 32–42 ). Each coxa large, elongate procoxa subtriangular, meso- and metacoxa arched. Trochanter (shortest segment) subtriangular, protrochanter twice, meso- and metatrochanter about three times shorter then femur, each with transversal line and few acuminate serrate scales. Femur elongate, subparallel, with acuminate, serrate scales mostly on inner and fine setae on outer side ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 23–31 ) and short tufted scales near apex ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 32–42 ). Tibia slightly longer than femur, with distinct acuminate, serrate scales on inner side and finer setae on outer side ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 23–31 ); proximal third of each tibia markedly widened, darkened ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 32–42 ). Tarsungulus long, slender, acuminate, slightly shorter than half length of tibia, moderately curved, with small, baso-ventral spines ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 23–31 ).
Abdomen with nine segments; anterior portion of segments (normally concealed by preceding segment) microreticulate ( Figs 38, 39 View FIGURES 32–42 ); exposed portion with admedian microgranulate paired spots, centrally with long thin seta ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–31 ), sparsely distributed short tufted setae and few (2–3 pairs) of long setae ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 32–42 ), posterior margin of segments 1–8 and apex of ninth abdominal segment finely rugose ( Figs 39, 40 View FIGURES 32–42 ), bearing row of flat, distally forked scales ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 32–42 ). Segments 1–8 simple, subrectangular in dorsal view, similar in shape, subequal in length, wider than long; distal margin with row of forked, flat scales ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 32–42 ). Segments 1–7 with distinct tergum, paired elongate pleura and subquadrate sternum ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 32–42 ); terga 1–5 with distinct sagittal line, area along line slightly grooved; segment 8 with all sclerites fused. Segment 9 trapezoidal, elongate, about 2.5 times as long as wide, tapering towards distal end. Apex darker then rest of tergum, emarginate, ending in two distinct lateral spinous processes ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 32–42 ); laterally from midline strongly depressed at both sides ( Figs 40, 41 View FIGURES 32–42 ). Ninth segment bearing retractile tufts of filamentous tracheal anal gills. Ventral operculum not reaching apex of segment 9; pentagonal, slightly longer then wide, tapering in posterior third, anterior margin straight, posterior margin with tufted setae, distal half with strong rhombic depression; apical opercular claws well developed, long and slender ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 32–42 ).
Material examined. Larvae (CZB, CCB, CKB, NMW, SNM): SLOVAKIA: 1 ex: Udava stream, Hostovické lúky, Ni ž ná Jablonka env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°07'48''N, 22°07'21''E, 329m a.s.l., 23. IV. 2003 GoogleMaps ; 17 exs: Svetlička stream, Svetlice env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°09'58''N, 22°01'33''E, 300m a.s.l., 24. IV. 2003 GoogleMaps ; 28 exs: Výrava stream, Svetlice env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°09'35''N, 22°00'54''E, 293m a.s.l., 24. IV. 2003 GoogleMaps ; 44 exs: Svetlička stream, Svetlice env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°09'58''N, 22°01'33''E, 300m a.s.l., 18. X. 2003 GoogleMaps ; 1 ex: Ulička stream, Kolbasov env., Poloniny, 21. VII. 2005 , Č iampor & Za ť ovičová lgt.; 54 exs: Svetlička stream, Svetlice env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°09'58''N, 22°01'33''E, 300m a.s.l., 22. VII. 2005 GoogleMaps , Č iampor & Za ť ovičová lgt.; 1 ex: Udava stream, Ni ž ná Jablonka env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 22. V. 2006 , Manko lgt .
Adults (all faunistic records from Slovakia) (CZB, CCB, CKB, NMW, SNM): SLOVAKIA: 1 ♀, 1 ♂: Svetlička stream, Svetlice env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°09'58''N, 22°01'33''E, 300m a.s.l., 18. X. 2003 GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂: Laborec river , Mokré lúky pod Č erti ž ným, Č erti ž né env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°20'31''N, 21°50'10''E, 402m a.s.l., 19. X. 2003 GoogleMaps ; 12 ♀♀: Svetlička stream, Svetlice env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°09'58''N, 22°01'33''E, 300m a.s.l., 16. VI. 2004 GoogleMaps , Za ť ovičová lgt .; 1 ♀: Výrava stream, Svetlice env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°09'35''N, 22°00'54''E, 293m a.s.l., 16. VI. 2004 GoogleMaps , Za ť ovičová lgt .; 15 ♀♀: Svetlička stream, Svetlice env., Nízke Beskydy Mts., 49°09'58''N, 22°01'33''E, 300m a.s.l., 22. VII. 2005 GoogleMaps , Č iampor & Za ť ovičová lgt .
Distribution and habitat. In general, the distribution of Stenelmis puberula has not been known sufficiently until now. According to the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera , it is known from Europe ( Armenia, Bosnia Herzegovina, Slovakia, Ukraine, Caucasus) and Asia ( Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Turkmenistan, Turkey) ( Jäch et al. 2006). In Slovakia, occurrence of the species is restricted exclusively to streams in the northeastern corner of the country, near the Polish and Ukrainian borders ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ). Orographicaly the studied region falls into the province Východné Karpaty (the Eastern Carpathians), the subprovince Vonkajšie Východné Karpaty (the Outer Eastern Carpathians) and the Nízke Beskydy and Poloniny areas. All streams where S. puberula was found belong to the Laborec river basin ( Kodada et al. 2004).
The steams under consideration are of middle size, approximately 5–10 m wide, with slowly running water and a low slope. They lie at an altitudinal range 300–402 m a.s.l. and have a small catchment area (10– 100 km 2). Their geological bedrock is formed mainly by flysch. The substrate is relatively uniform, consisting of pebbles, cobbles and gravel, partly supplemented by submerged wood and moss. All localities are located close to human settlements and the species is tolerant to their moderately organically polluted water.
S. puberula was found in association with other elmid species: Elmis maugetii Latreille , Esolus parallelepipedus (Müller) , Limnius volckmari (Panzer) ; also, to a lesser extent, Elmis aenea (Müller) , E. obscura (Müller), Esolus angustatus (Müller) , E. pygmaeus (Müller) , Limnius intermedius Fairmaire , L. perrisi (Dufour) , Riolus cupreus (Müller) and R. subviolaceus (Müller) (Za ť ovičová et al. 2004).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |