Amphicnaeia lineata Bates, 1866
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.57800/faunitaxys-12(6) |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6A73A225-0571-4BF2-B21B-FDDAAD55A3A7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF52564D-FFFC-FFB4-78D0-FE095207017B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amphicnaeia lineata Bates, 1866 |
status |
|
Amphicnaeia lineata Bates, 1866 View in CoL
Amphicnaeia lineata Bates, 1866: 33 View in CoL ; Monné, 2023: 445 (cat.). Amphicnaeia plurivittis Belon, 1903: 65 View in CoL .
Amphicnaeia affinis Breuning, 1940: 41 View in CoL .
Remarks. – According to Wappes et al. (2019): “The type locality of A. [ Amphicnaeia ] affinis was originally described as being Santos city (Santo Amaro Island). However, the insular area of Santos is located in São Vicente Island, which is separated from Santo Amaro Island by less than 500 meters. It is Guarujá city that is located on Santo Amaro Island, which was already incorporated into the city of Santos. Thus, it is not possible to know if the specimen was collected in the insular area of Santos ( São Vicente Island), or if it was collected in the Santo Amaro Island, in the city of Guarujá.” Additionally the holotype of Estola marmorata was collected by G.E. Bryant in 1912, on Santo Amaro Island, near Santos, as indicated on the label. Therefore, the type locality of E. marmorata is Santo Amaro Island, which is located in the Brazilian state of São Paulo, and not Santos.
DEMIPHORINI Thomson, 1860
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amphicnaeia lineata Bates, 1866
Bezark, Larry G. & Santos-Silva, Antonio 2024 |
Amphicnaeia lineata
Monne M. A. 2023: 445 |