Morogorius pallidus Verhoeff, 1941

Enghoff, Henrik, Ngute, Alain Senghor K., Mnendendo, Hamidu R., Kivambe, Exaud E., Mhagawale, Waziri, Malanda, Robin C., Mpoto, Athuman & Marshall, Andrew R., 2025, A mountain of millipedes XII. The Chelodesmidae of the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania (Diplopoda, Polydesmida), European Journal of Taxonomy 997, pp. 210-255 : 233

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.997.2935

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B5B16E6-9F24-47A7-B4F0-62364E6C16A1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D924C438-FFAC-FFC7-B53C-A3B4FAF07C95

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Morogorius pallidus Verhoeff, 1941
status

 

Morogorius pallidus Verhoeff, 1941 View in CoL

Diagnosis

Differs from other species of Morogorius by the deep division of the parasolenomere into a long slender branch and a considerably shorter daggerlike branch, in combination with a well-developed ‘shoulder’ of the solenomere ( Verhoeff 1941: fig. 21; Hoffman 1977: fig. 11).

Material examined (total 1 ♀)

Paratype

TANZANIA • 1 ♀; “Tanganyika”; “1123”; ZMB 2696 .

Descriptive notes

Body length ca 23 mm; max. width 3.0 mm. 20 ‘segments’, i.e., 18 podous + 1 apodous ring + telson.

A side-by side comparison with a female of Morogorius divisus Enghoff sp. nov. shows the following differences:

– the posterior margin of the collum is straight, not ‘trapezoid’ (cp. Fig. 3C View Fig );

– the peritremata are clearly, not indistinctly set off from the lateral margin of the paranota (cp. Fig. 3E View Fig ).

Details of spinnerets not visible (no SEM).

Remarks

Maybe this female is not conspecific with the holotype male and maybe even belong to another genus?

In any case, there is no doubt that the gonopods of M. pallidus as described by Verhoeff (1941) and Hoffman (1977) are ‘congeneric’ with those of the new species of Morogorius described above.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF