Lojata Strand, 1933
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5661.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FFD287FF-2AD2-47FC-86B0-B629B641054F |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D912B30C-FFBA-FFCB-FF5B-C8C140B1FF27 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lojata Strand, 1933 |
status |
|
Lojata Strand, 1933 View in CoL
( Figs. 4−5 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 )
Loja Schmidt, 1932: 45 View in CoL [n. gen.]. Type species: Loja ohausi Schmidt, 1932: 47 View in CoL , preoccupied.
Lojata Strand, 1933: 122 View in CoL [as new name for Loja Schmidt View in CoL , preoccupied].
Diagnosis. Large sharpshooters (13.4−16.5 mm). Body covered with nodular callosities. Head ( Fig. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 , 5A, B View FIGURE 5 ) well produced anteriorly; crown ( Figs. 4A View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 ) posterior portion with a pair of conspicuous tuberosities bordering posterior margin; transition between crown and face with a complete transverse carina; clypeus continuing profile of frons. Pronotum ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 ) width almost as wide as transocular width of head; in dorsal view, with lateral margins convergent anteriorly; dorsopleural keel ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 , 5B View FIGURE 5 ) complete and strong. Forewing ( Figs. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 , 5A, B View FIGURE 5 ) brachypterous, exposing three ( Fig. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 ) to five ( Fig. 5A, B View FIGURE 5 ) abdominal terga, coriaceous and conspicuously punctate, without membrane. Hind wing ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 ) also brachypterous, significantly shorter than forewing, less than half the forewing length. Male pygofer ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ) not produced posteriorly and without processes; inner margin ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ), in caudal view, with sclerotized lobes. Subgenital plate, in lateral view ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ), with a median and a pre-apical triangular fang-like projections on dorsal margin. Connective ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ) arms converging anteriorly; stem broadly linear. Aedeagus atrium ( Fig. 4I, K View FIGURE 4 ) with ventral margin projected as a pair of broad and elongate ventral processes, extending posteriorly and dorsally. Dorsal connective ( Fig. 4J View FIGURE 4 ) H-shaped. Paraphyses ( Fig. 4I, K View FIGURE 4 ) absent.
Distribution. Colombia [new record], Ecuador. Before this work, Lojata was only known from Ecuador in Loja ( Schmidt 1932; Young 1968), based on the type locality of the type species Lojata ohausi . With the present study, the distribution of the genus is expanded, and it is reported for the first time in Colombia, in the municipality of Yarumal.
Remarks. A diagnosis for the genus was made to include some variations found in the new species herein described. Prior to this study, no formal diagnosis had been presented for Lojata . Additionally, Young (1968), in his review of the Proconiini tribe, mentioned that the posterior tibia of Lojata lacks macrosetae. However, this assertion is clearly erroneous, as both L. andina sp. nov. ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 A-B) and L. ohausi ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A-B) exhibit well-defined macrosetae on their posterior tibiae. Furthermore, we describe, for the first time, characters of the male terminalia within the genus. Lojata was recovered in a combined morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis as closely related to Mareba Distant, 1908 with this clade, in turn, being related to Proconobola Young, 1968 (Takiya et al., in prep.). Lojata shares with species of both genera several morphological characteristics of the male terminalia, such as: (1) connective broadly linear with the stem killed medially; (2) aedeagus shaft tubular and short; and (3) long and robust paired ventral aedeagal processes. Also, it shares with Mareba the clypeus continuing the profile of the frons and with Proconobola the body covered with nodular tuberosities and the pygofer inner margin with sclerotized lobes. Despite these similarities in the male terminalia structures, Lojata can be easily distinguished from Mareba and Proconobola by its external morphology, including diagnostic characteristics such as: (1) crown ( Figs. 4A View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 ) posterior portion with a pair of conspicuous tuberosities bordering posterior margin (absent in the other genera); (2) pronotum ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 , 5A View FIGURE 5 ) width almost as wide as transocular width of head (greater than transocular width in the related genera); and (3) forewing and hindwing ( Figs. 4A, B View FIGURE 4 , 5A, B View FIGURE 5 ) brachypterous (macropterous in the other genera). Additionally, Lojata can also be separated from both related genera by some characters of the male terminalia, such as the subgenital plates ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ) with a median and a pre-apical triangular fang-like projections on dorsal margin (with a median dorsal short projection in Mareba and a spinelike apical projection in Proconobola ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Lojata Strand, 1933
Sauceda-V, Jefferson & Takiya, Daniela M. 2025 |
Lojata
Strand, E. 1933: 122 |
Loja
Schmidt, E. 1932: 45 |
Schmidt, E. 1932: 47 |