Brevitubus subpinglong, Zhu & Liao & Yin & Xu, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2AEF30EC-BCE0-4A0D-8793-3CCDF0C6176B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15562636 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D766C41B-FFC7-FF9B-F4DC-6DB1B578FDEE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Brevitubus subpinglong |
status |
sp. nov. |
Brevitubus subpinglong sp. nov (żīDzSŝe)
Figs 6–8 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8
Type material. China • ♀ holotype; Guangxi, Laibin City, Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County, Yinshan Park ; 24°24'00"N, 110°14'37"E; 1148 m a.s.l.; 8 Oct. 2021; A.L. He, J.X. Liu, Z.G. Huang, R.R. Liao, Q. Li, X.M. Yang, Y.L. Wen, Z. Ye, and Y. Liu leg.; HUN592 GoogleMaps .
Paratypes. China • 5 ♂♂; same data as for holotype; HUN593 to 597 GoogleMaps .
Etymology. This specific epithet is the combination of the Latin prefix “ sub ” and “ pinglong ”, meaning that this new species is similar to B. pinglong comb. nov.
Diagnosis. This new species is similar to Brevitubus pinglong ( Liang, Li, Yin, Li & Xu, 2021) comb. nov. in having similar spermathecae and copulatory ducts in female but can be distinguished by the globet-shaped median septum in the new species (versus rectangular-shaped in B. pinglong ) (compare Fig. 6C, 6D View FIGURE 6 with fig. 2C, 2D in Liang et al. 2021). This new species is similar to Brevitubus haitun ( Liu, Xu & Yin, 2023) comb. nov. in having similar femoral apophysis in male, but can be distinguished by the RTA modified forming a about three-quarter circle, with a long and sharp distal end (in dorsal view) in the new species (versus RTA modified to form a half circle, with a short and flat distal end and an additional triangular apophysis at the base in B. haitun ) (compare Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 with fig. 8D in Liu et al. 2023).
Description. Female (holotype): total length 3.84; carapace 1.68 long, 1.49 wide; abdomen 2.04 long, 1.18wide. Carapace yellowish-brown, with a very conspicuous chrysanthemum-petal-shaped pattern ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 , 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Cervical groove and radial furrow integrating into the pattern of carapace. Fovea dark red, longitudinal. AER and PER slightly recurved. Eye sizes and interdistances:AME 0.08, ALE 0.09, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09, AME−AME 0.04, AME−ALE 0.02, PME−PME 0.10, PME−PLE 0.05, ALE−PLE 0.09, AME−PME 0.07, ALE−ALE 0.44, PLE−PLE 0.56. CH 0.06. Chelicera with 3 promarginal and 2 retromarginal teeth. MOA 0.24 long, anterior width 0.23, posterior width 0.31. Leg measurements: I 6.92 (1.56, 0.42, 2.07, 1.82, 1.05); II 5.67 (1.32, 0.48, 1.63, 1.34, 0.90); III 4.78 (1.15, 0.40, 1.30, 1.23, 0.70); IV 7.29 (1.83, 0.41, 1.87, 2.12, 1.06); Leg formula: 4123. Leg spination: Femur I pv1-1-1-1, II pv1-1-1; Tibia I v2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2, II v2-2-2-2-2-2-2; Metatarsus I v2-2-2-2, II pv1-1-1-1, rv1-1-1. Abdomen oval, dorsally with 1 short transverse white strip close to the posterior end ( Figs 6A View FIGURE 6 , 7A View FIGURE 7 ), ventrally with 2 longitudinally light brown stripes and 1 brown patch anterior to spinnerets ( Figs 6B View FIGURE 6 , 7B View FIGURE 7 ).
Epigyne. Two atria sac-like, with highly sclerotized margins ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ). Copulatory ducts highly sclerotized and short ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ); Connecting tubes short and close to the bean-shaped spermathecae ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ). Spermathecae separated from each other by approximately the width of one spermatheca. Fertilization ducts originating from the anterior margins of the spermathecae, with the distal end not sharp, giving a false impression of being cut off ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ).
Male (paratype): total length 3.58, carapace 1.5 long, 1.31 wide; abdomen 1.84 long, 1.15 wide. Carapace with a conspicuous chrysanthemum-petal-shaped pattern ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Cervical groove and radial furrow not evident. Fovea dark red, longitudinal. AER and PER recurved. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09 ALE 0.07, PME 0.08, PLE 0.07, AME−AME 0.04, AME−ALE 0.02, PME−PME 0.10, PME−PLE 0.04, ALE−PLE 0.08, AME−PME 0.07, ALE−ALE 0.41, PLE−PLE 0.51. CH 0.06. Chelicera with 3 promarginal and 2 retromarginal teeth. MOA 0.20 long, anterior width 0.24, posterior width 0.31. Leg measurements: I 6.87 (1.72, 0.40, 2.11, 1.71, 0.93); II 5.18 (1.22, 0.36, 1.65, 1.19, 0.76); III 4.36 (1.21, 0.37, 0.98, 1.12, 0.68); IV 7.27 (1.94, 0.50, 1.78, 2.09, 0.96); Leg formula: 4123. Leg spination: Femur I pv1-1-1-1, II pv1-1-1; Tibia I v2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2, II v2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2; Metatarsus I v2-2-2- 2, II pv1-1-1-1, rv1-1-1. Other characteristics resemble those of female.
Palp. Femur with a distinct apophysis ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ). RTA present, strongly modified into a large hook (about a three quarters circle) and with a reddish-brown sharp distal end in dorsal view ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ). Tegular apophysis triangular, located on the tegular anteriorly. Sperm duct distinct, U-shaped (forming almost a three-quarter circle), occupying ~1/3 length of tegulum. Embolus short, slightly twisting, with a needle-like end. Conductor membranous, longitudinally elongated and supporting the base of the embolus ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ).
Distribution. Known only from the type locality in Guangxi, China ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |