Dioscorea communis ( Linnaeus 1753: 1028 ) Caddick & Wilkin (2002: 112)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.260.3.5 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CF11D27C-264E-FFA0-FF7C-B2A979C8FAD6 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Dioscorea communis ( Linnaeus 1753: 1028 ) Caddick & Wilkin (2002: 112) |
| status |
|
Dioscorea communis ( Linnaeus 1753: 1028) Caddick & Wilkin (2002: 112) View in CoL
Bas.: Tamus communis Linnaeus (1753: 1028)
Type ( lectotype, designated here):—Herb. Linn. No. 1181.2 ( LINN! [digital image], image of the lectotype is available at http://linnean-online.org/11848/).
= Tamus communis var. subtriloba Gussone (1844: 880–881) View in CoL
Type ( lectotype, designated here):—[ Italy, Sicily, Palermo] “Vergine Maria”, April–May ( NAP! s.c. [digital image!], for image of the lectotype see Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
= Tamus cretica Linnaeus (1753: 1028) View in CoL
Type ( neotype (designated by Kit Tan in Davis (1984: 553) as isotype and corrected by Jarvis (2007: 879) as neotype):—Herb. Tournefort No. 283 (P, barcode P00665856! [digital image!]).
| LINN |
Linnean Society of London |
| NAP |
Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica (formerly National Academy of Peiping) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Dioscorea communis ( Linnaeus 1753: 1028 ) Caddick & Wilkin (2002: 112)
| Ferrer-Gallego, P. Pablo & Boisset, Fernando 2016 |
Dioscorea communis ( Linnaeus 1753: 1028 )
| Caddick, L. R. & Wilkin, P. & Rudall, P. J. & Hedderson, T. A. J. & Chase, M. W. 2002: 1028 |
Tamus communis var. subtriloba
| Gussone, G. 1844: ) |
Tamus cretica
| Linnaeus, C. 1753: ) |