Dolomedes karschi Strand, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5594.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1FD4178F-6FF0-4610-A8ED-A8EE640CB4ED |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14996391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD6287C2-FFA3-FFC8-1B96-F9C4FB92F848 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dolomedes karschi Strand, 1913 |
status |
|
Dolomedes karschi Strand, 1913 View in CoL
Figs 3–10 View FIGURES 3–10
Dolomedes (Tarentuloides) karschi Strand, 1913: 121 View in CoL (♂).
Type material. Holotype ♂ ( SMF4847-137 About SMF ), CEYLON (= SRI LANKA), 1874, leg. G. Worms, examined based on photographs.
Diagnosis. Males of D. karschi can be distinguished from the known males of Dolomedes species except D. mizhoanus by the combination of the following features: 1) a broad and thick RTA that fully surrounds the retrolateral side of palpal tibia; 2) a broad-based median apophysis with a ventrally folded base that forms a basal extension; 3) a DST with a retrolaterally extended posterior edge; 4) a long embolus that extends through the dorsal distal tegular projection; 5) a broad-based fulcrum drastically narrowed at its curved section; 6) an elongated lateral subterminal apophysis that can be observed retrolaterally without the expansion of the palp; and 7) chelicerae usually with more than three promarginal teeth ( Figs 7–9 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Males of D. karschi can be separated from the males of D. mizhoanus by the anteriorly protruded RTA with three spines (vs. RTA flat with a single spine in D. mizhoanus ); by the triangular basal extension of the median apophysis (vs. thumb-shaped in D. mizhoanus ); and by the fulcrum with less protruded ventral edge (vs. more protruded in D. mizhoanus ) (cf. Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 3–10 and Zhang et al. 2004: figs 21–22).
Redescription. Male in ethanol ( Figs 3–6 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Carapace brown, laterally covered with dense, short, grayish setae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–10 ); eye region red-brown, with sparse gray-brown setae; chelicerae dark yellow-brown, covered with long setae near fang furrow; endites, labium, and sternum yellow-brown; legs brown, covered with gray-brown setae, femur IV ventrally covered with extra dense long setae; dorsum of opisthosoma bearded with short, dark brown setae forming irregular brownish patches ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–10 ), anterolaterally with several lines of white setae, venter yellow-brown. Fovea distinct, longitudinal ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Cheliceral promargin with five teeth, two large basal, and three small apical positioned close to central furrow, retromargin with four equal-sized teeth. Opisthosoma long-oval, with distinct cardiac mark ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Body length 15.82. Carapace 8.74 long, 8.28 wide. Opisthosoma 7.08 long, 4.92 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.26, AME 0.34, PLE 0.58, PME 0.52; AME–ALE 0.14, AME–AME 0.16, PME–PLE 0.48, PME–PME 0.24. Clypeus 1.25 long. Chelicerae 3.03 long. Length of palp and legs: palp 13.23 [5.40, 1.71, 2.51, 3.61], I 40.80 [11.02, 4.39, 10.89, 10.59, 5.67], II 40.80 [11.17, 3.23, 10.69, 10.14, 5.57], III 38.14 [10.59, 4.08, 9.25, 9.16, 5.06], IV 45.70 [11.69, 4.43, 11.14, 11.84, 6.60]. Leg formula: 4123. Palp ( Figs 7–9 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Palpal tibia with a thumb-shaped ventral tibial apophysis and retrolaterally surrounded by a broad, highly sclerotised, and anteriorly protruded RTA with three sharp spines ( Figs 7–9 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Basal retrolateral edge of the venter of cymbium with a long-oval basal cymbium apophysis ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Tegulum sclerotised, prolaterally attached to a large and elongated distal tegular projection, and retrolaterally to a long, membranous, and triangular conductor ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Subtegulum small, lying basomedial to the tegulum ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Tegulum, distal tegular projection, and conductor form a U-shaped tegular ring having a highly sclerotised saddle that lies its lower center ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Median apophysis hook-shaped, lying retrolaterally to the saddle, and is equally wide with a broad base; median apophysis basoretrolaterally with a triangular ventral fold ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Fulcrum hook-shaped, with a very broad base, drastically shrinking at the curved region, with a folded ventral edge forming a groove containing the long, narrow, and curved embolus ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Lateral subterminal apophysis elongated with a rounded tip, visible retrolaterally without expanding the palp ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 3–10 ). Fulcrum, embolus, and lateral subterminal apophysis originated from distal sclerotised tube of apical division.
Variation. Unknown.
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. Sri Lanka (exact type locality unknown) ( Strand 1913) ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dolomedes karschi Strand, 1913
Sankaran, Pradeep M. & Kadam, Gautam 2025 |
Dolomedes (Tarentuloides) karschi
Strand, E. 1913: 121 |