Draconarius laosensis, Hoang & Nophaseud & Jäger, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5590.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6C0F3810-97EE-4779-A4B5-00DE65C4F222 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14953554 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CC0887D4-FFF6-FFEA-FF4C-FD4984AEFC85 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Draconarius laosensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Draconarius laosensis spec. nov.
Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1 View FIGURES 2 View FIGURES 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURES 5 , 8 View FIGURES 8 , 10–11 View FIGURES 10 View FIGURES 11
Type material. Holotype male: LAOS: Vientiane Province: west Vang Vieng, Tham Khan , 18°55'32.52"N, 102°25'8.04"E, 314 m a.s.l., inside cave, by day, by hand, 27 December 2023, Q.D. Hoang leg. ( VNMN) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 2 females, with same data as for holotype ( VNMN) GoogleMaps , 1 male, west Vang Vieng , Tham Soksay, 18°5523.30"N, 102°23'8.71"E, 273 m a.s.l., inside cave, by day, by hand, 7 Dec. 2023, C. Kennedy leg. ( SMF) ; 1 female, with same data as previous specimen, except for: Tham Puna , 18°55'33.16"N, 102°22'56.60"E, 280 m a.s.l., 9 October 2024 ( SMF) GoogleMaps ; 2 females, north Vang Vieng , west Ban Phoxay, Tham Kieo, 19°0'48.00"N, 102°25'54.12"E, 370 m a.s.l., inside cave, by hand, 2 Dec. 2012, P. Jäger leg. ( SMF) GoogleMaps .
Additional material examined. 1 immature female, with same data as for holotype ( VNMN) GoogleMaps ; 1 juvenile female, with same data as for holotype, except for: P. Jäger & S. Packheiser leg. 24 Jul. 2018 ( SMF) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the type locality; adjective.
Diagnosis. Males of the new species ( Figs 1B–C View FIGURES 1 , 2A–C View FIGURES 2 ) resemble those of D. linzhiensis (Hu, 2001) ( Li et al. 2019: fig. 3A–C) in having a similar conformation of RTA and LTA, short cymbial furrow, conductor with jagged margin and embolus without coil, but it differs from the latter by the following characteristics: patellar apophysis thin and pointed tip ( Fig. 1B–C View FIGURES 1 ), relatively blunt and wide tip in D. linzhiensis ( Li et al. 2019, fig. 3B–C); RTA nearly as half as tibia in the new species and swollen medially ( Fig. 1C View FIGURES 1 ), more than half tibia length and slightly concave in D. linzhiensis ( Li et al. 2019, fig. 3C); conductor blunt ( Fig. 1B–C View FIGURES 1 ) vs. pointed tip in D. linzhiensis ( Li et al. 2019, fig. 3B, C), embolus base narrow at 5 o’clock ( Fig. 1B View FIGURES 1 ) while wide and at 6 o’clock in D. linzhiensis ( Li et al. 2019, fig. 3B). Females of the new species ( Figs 3A–D View FIGURES 3 , 4A–D View FIGURE 4 ) are similar to that of D. episomos Wang, 2003 ( Wang 2003, fig. 30B) in having a small atrium situated near epigastric furrow, similar shape and position of epigynal teeth, but can be distinguished from the latter by: copulatory ducts wide and long, running parallel anteriorly and connecting spermathecae posteriorly, extremely short in D. episomos ( Wang 2003, fig. 30B); spermathecal heads invisible in the new species, visible in D. episomos , ( Wang 2003, fig. 30B).
Description. Male (holotype). Measurements: Total length 8.41. Prosoma length 4.23, width 2.81. Opisthosoma length 4.18, width 2.24. Prosoma dorsally yellowish brown covered by sparse short grey setae, with a conspicuous longitudinal fovea ( Fig. 1A View FIGURES 1 ). Sternum yellowish brown covered by some grey setae. Chelicerae brown, with 3 promarginal, 2 retromarginal teeth and 1 escort seta. Opisthosoma yellowish brown covered with dense long grey setae and with some lighter inverted chevrons, dorsally ( Fig. 1A View FIGURES 1 ). Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.09, ALE 0.16, PME 0.17, PLE 0.18; AME–AME 0.07, AME–ALE 0.04, AME–PME 0.06, ALE–PLE 0.01, PME–PME 0.06, PME–PLE 0.09. Leg measurements: I 22.94 (5.64, 7.29, 6.58, 3.43); II 19.41 (5.05, 5.88, 5.59, 2.89); III 17.39 (4.54, 5.21, 5.50, 2.14); IV 22.49 (5.75, 6.50, 7.43, 2.81). Leg formula I–IV–II–III.
Palp ( Figs 1B, C View FIGURES 1 ): Yellowish brown. Patellar apophysis thin, pointed and ventrad ( Figs 1B, C View FIGURES 1 ), RTA nearly half of tibia length, LTA about ¼ of RTA length ( Fig. 1C View FIGURES 1 ), cymbial furrow nearly half cymbium length, conductor simple and wide, lamella with jagged margin ( Figs 1B, C View FIGURES 1 ), embolus stout and without any coils, slightly bent at tip, embolus arising in 6 o’clock position, turning retrolateral first, and then prolaterally and distally, median apophysis elongated ( Figs 1B, C View FIGURES 1 ).
Female (paratype from Tham Khan). As in male, except for: Measurements: Total length 9.83. Prosoma length 4.28, width 2.90. Opisthosoma length 4.55, width 3.02. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.08, ALE 0.17, PME 0.16, PLE 0.15; AME–AME 0.08, AME–ALE 0.06, AME–PME 0.07, ALE–PLE 0.01, PME–PME 0.07, PME–PLE 0.11. Leg measurements: I 18.11 (4.67, 6.04, 4.89, 2.51); II 15.30 (4.21, 4.95, 3.97, 2.17); III 14.30 (3.86, 4.47, 4.03, 1.94); IV 18.52 (4.83, 5.78, 5.65, 2.26). Leg formula IV–I–II–III.
Epigyne ( Figs 3B–D View FIGURES 3 ): Epigyne slightly wider than long; epigynal teeth short, far away from each other; atrium present near epigastric furrow; copulatory ducts wide, long, running parallel anteriorly and connecting to spermathecae posteriorly, touching each other dorsally; spermathecal heads invisible; spermathecal stalks broad, expanded anteriorly; spermathecal bases small and separated.
Variation. Males: Total length: 6.8, prosoma length 3.8, width 2.5. Opisthosoma length 3.1, width 1.9. Females: Total length: 8.1–9.2, prosoma length 3.8–4.3, width 2.5. Opisthosoma length 4.3–4.9, width 3.0. The male from Tham Soksay ( Figs 2A–C View FIGURES 2 ) exhibits a variation compared to the holotype ( Figs 1B–C View FIGURES 1 ) as patellar apophysis directed more distad ( Fig. 2C View FIGURES 2 ). Similarly, the female from Tham Kieo ( Figs 4A–D View FIGURE 4 ) also shows notable variation compared to specimens from Tham Khan ( Figs 3B–D View FIGURES 3 ) as epigynal teeth situated more posteriorly ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Furthermore, although the specimens in this study were collected from different caves, we consider all differences intraspecific variation.
Distribution. Laos (Vientiane Province) ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 8 , 10 View FIGURES 10 , 11 View FIGURES 11 ).
Natural history. The species has only been found in the caves from Vang Vieng karst, Vientiane Province, Laos, spiders residing on a funnel-webs ( Figs 5A–D View FIGURES 5 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |