Camptomorpha undetermined
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.34.1.01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15610456 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C46D87F6-BB50-0320-8709-B131FAD06EE8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Camptomorpha undetermined |
status |
|
A PICTORIAL KEY TO CAMPTOMORPHA SPECIES , BASED ON GONOPODAL STRUCTURE
1. Prefemoral process (PfP) equal or subequal in length to acropodite (A) ( Fig. 4D–F View Fig )........................................... 2
– Prefemoral process (PfP) conspicuously longer than acropodite (A) ( Fig. 9B–D View Fig ) ..................................................... 7
2. Prefemoral process (PfP) with at least two acute projections at mesal margin ( Figs 1B View Fig , 5B View Fig )...................................... 3
– Prefemoral process (PfP) without well-developed projections at mesal margin ( Figs 2C View Fig , 6B View Fig )...................................... 4
3. Apex of acropodite (A) with a triangular projection ( Fig. 5C View Fig ) .................................................................... C. Orites
– Apex of acropodite (A) divided into two acuminate branches ( Fig. 1B–C View Fig ).................................................. C. AberrAns
4. Mesal apical margin of prefemoral process (PfP) conspicuously irregular, with indentations and a digitiform projection near its middle ( Fig. 2C View Fig ) ............................................... 5
– Mesal apicaI margin of prefemoral process (PfP) regular, with neither indentations nor a digitiform projection ( Figs 4F View Fig , 6B View Fig ) .......................................................................... 6
5. Digitiform projection at mesal margin of prefemoral process (PfP) regular, without indentations ( Fig. 7B–D View Fig )............ ..................................................................... C. pApillOsA
– Digitiform projection at mesal margin of prefemoral process (PfP) irregular, with small indentations ( Fig. 2C View Fig ).......... ......................................................................... C. atypha
6. Solenomere branch (sl) bipartite ( Fig. 6B View Fig ) .......... C. Ortizi
– Solenomere (sl) a single branch ( Fig. 4D View Fig )........ C. dOrsAlis
7. Prefemoral process (PfP) with only a single lateral projection ( Fig. 9B–D View Fig )................................................................... 8
– Prefemoral process (PfP) with at least two lateral projections ( Fig. 3D–E View Fig ) ................................................................. 10
8. Apex of prefemoral process (PfP) deeply divided into two branches ( Fig. 9C View Fig ) ............................................ C. titAnA
– Apex of prefemoral process (PfP) either weakly divided or not divided ( Fig. 11B View Fig )................................................... 9
9. Prefemoral process (PfP) bipartite, divided into two subequal branches ( Fig. 11B–E View Fig ) ............................... C. weyrAucHi
– Prefemoral process (PfP) bipartite, but button-shaped at apex and divided into two branches of different size, both spiniform and one (d) being significantlY more stronglY developed than spine b ( Fig. 12J–M View Fig ). C. HOffmAni sp.n.
10. Apex of prefemoral process (PfP) strongly directed basally ( Fig. 8B–D View Fig ) ................................................................ 11
– Apex of prefemoral process (PfP) only slightly directed basally ( Fig. 3D View Fig )................................................ C. digitAtA
11. Prefemoral process (PfP) bipartite, apical part being subsecuriform and middle one with a strong, unequallY bifid spine ( Fig. 10B–D View Fig ) .................................. C. tOcAcHensis
– Prefemoral process (PfP) more simple, a single branch with an acuminate unciform apex and two smaller, similarly unciform, lateral processes ( Fig. 8B–D View Fig )..... C. pulvillAtA
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |