Hyalaus, Zhang & Cong & Shen & Song & Grishin, 2024

Zhang, Jing, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Song, Leina & Grishin, Nick V., 2024, Taxonomic advances driven by the genomic analysis of butterflies, The Taxonomic Report of the International Lepidoptera Survey 11 (7), pp. 1-43 : 4-5

publication ID

2B44E674-0784-4977-ADE5-A8AD69E30582

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2B44E674-0784-4977-ADE5-A8AD69E30582

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C45B002E-FFEA-FF88-E22F-AE76732D31EB

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Hyalaus
status

subgen. nov.

Hyalaus Grishin , new subgenus

http://zoobank.org/ 3F5F76FC-9BDA-48A2-A6C2-53C0C2E49C2D

Type species. Papilio epidaus E. Doubleday, 1846 .

Definition. Genomic phylogeny that includes type species of all available genus-group names in Eurytides Hübner, [1821] View in CoL (type species Eurytides iphitas Hübner, [1821] View in CoL ) reveals a lineage consisting of Eurytides epidaus (E. Doubleday, 1846) (type locality in Mexico (Yucatan) and Honduras) ( Fig. 1 magenta) that is sister to the subgenus Mimoides K. Brown, 1991 View in CoL (type species Papilio ariarathes Esper, 1788 View in CoL ). The subgenus Boreographium Grishin, 2021 (type species Papilio marcellus Cramer, 1777 ) is sister to both Mimoides View in CoL and the lineage with E. epidaus . To keep the classification monophyletic, this Mimoides View in CoL , or a new subgenus should be erected for it. Mimoides View in CoL , as originally circumscribed, includes species unified by certain recognizable appearance,

and E. epidaus does not resemble this phenotype,

having a different look (Fig. 2) more similar to

Protesilaus W. Swainson, 1832 View in CoL (type species

Papilio protesilaus Linnaeus, 1758 ). Moreover,

Mimoides is a genetically compact group ( Fig. 1),

and E. epidaus is separated from Mimoides by a prominent tree branch. The COI barcode difference between E. epidaus and E. ariarathes (the type species of Mimoides ) is 6.8% (45 bp), which is not atypical for species in different subgenera. For all these reasons, we propose to treat the lineage with

E. epidaus as a new subgenus. This new subgenus differs from others by the presence of a hyaline area on the forewing distad of the postdiscal discal dark band; more produced, rounder forewing apex similar in shape to that of Mimoides ; harpe with hookshaped process in the middle directed anteroventrad, also present in Boreographium but absent in others, e.g., in Mimoides , and differs from Boreographium by a broader dorsal keel and excavate distal margin. In DNA, a combination of the following characters is diagnostic in the nuclear genome: pgl8036.1.5:T51A, pgl231.44.1:G809A, pgl231.44.1:T816C, pgl 2266.11.4:T147C, pgl3034.5.5:T39A and in COI barcode: T133A, A352C, T364A, T454A, A541T. Etymology. In Greek, hyalos (ὕαλος) means glass; named for the glassy (i.e., hyaline) areas on forewings of the type species. The name is a masculine noun in the nominative singular.

Species included. Only the type species (i.e., Papilio epidaus E. Doubleday, 1846 ).

Parent taxon. Genus Eurytides Hübner, [1821] .

Comment. As a result, we partitioned the genus Eurytides into six subgenera: Mimoides , Hyalaus subgen. n., Boreographium , Neographium Möhn, 2002 (type species Papilio philolaus Boisduval, 1836 ), Eurytides , and Protesilaus W. Swainson, 1832 ( Fig. 1).

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF