Lysmata bahia Rhyne and Lin, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2021032 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C14A87EB-9273-FF96-FC26-977E9A77F84B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lysmata bahia Rhyne and Lin, 2006 |
status |
|
Lysmata bahia Rhyne and Lin, 2006
Lysmata bahia Rhyne and Lin, 2006: 191 , figs. 16–18, pls. 1F, 2; Barros-Alves et al., 2015: 3, figs. 1C,
3; Pachelle et al., 2016: 16, tab. 1; Pachelle et al., 2020: 60, figs. 3–4.
Hyppolysmata (Hippolysmata) wurdemanni : Fausto Filho, 1970: 56; Coelho and Ramos, 1972: 153 (partim?) [not L. wurdemanni ( Gibbes, 1850) , see Rhyne and Lin, 2006]
Lysmata wurdemanni : Chace, 1972: 129 (remarks on São Paulo material); Coelho et al., 2006: 121, tab. 3 (partim?) [not L. wurdemanni ( Gibbes, 1850) ]
Material examined. 1 ov. specimen (10.86 mm CL), 1 non-ov. specimen (10.26 mm CL), MZUSP 41122 View Materials , Queimada Grande Island , Peruíbe, São Paulo State, Brazil, collector Marques, C.H.A. (artisanal fisherman), 01.viii.2018 .
First record for São Paulo. Santos harbor ( Rhyne and Lin, 2006).
Distribution. Western Atlantic: Panama and Brazil (Ceará, Sergipe, Bahia, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo) ( Rhyne and Lin, 2006; Barros-Alves et al., 2015; Pachelle et al., 2016; Terossi et al., 2018; Pachelle et al., 2020; present study).
Remarks. Lysmata bahia was first reported from Brazil by Fausto Filho (1970) as Hippolysmata wurdemanni Gibbes, 1850 , followed by the first occurrence in São Paulo as Lysmata wurdemanni ( Gibbes, 1850) by Chace (1972), which were later considered paratypes of L. bahia by Rhyne and Lin (2006). It is also one of the three species that belongs to the L. wurdermanni complex in Brazil, along with Lysmata ankeri Rhyne and Lin, 2006 and L. wurdermanni (see Pachelle et al., 2020). The analyzed specimens presented all the diagnostic characteristics of L. bahia , according to Pachelle et al. (2020). The two specimens presented long stylocerites, almost reaching the distal margin of the first article of the antennular peduncle, which is a characteristic that differentiates L. bahia from L. ankeri and L. wurdemanni (which have a comparatively shorter stylocerite) ( Pachelle et al., 2020). However, the two specimens presented the carpus of the first pereiopod about 4 times longer than tall, instead of 4.5 times,as indicated by Pachelle et al. (2020).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lysmata bahia Rhyne and Lin, 2006
Carvalho-Batista, Rafael de Carvalho Santos Douglas Fernandes Rodrigues Alves Abner 2021 |
Lysmata bahia
Barros-Alves, S. D. P. & Alves, D. F. R. & Silva, S. L. R. & Guimaraes, C. R. P. & Hirose, G. L. 2015: 3 |
Rhyne, A. L. & Lin, J. 2006: 191 |
Lysmata wurdemanni
Coelho, P. A. & Almeida, A. O. & Souza-Filho, J. F. & Bezerra, L. E. A. & Giraldes, B. W. 2006: 121 |
Chace, F. 1972: 129 |
Hyppolysmata (Hippolysmata) wurdemanni
Coelho, P. A. & Ramos, M. A. 1972: 153 |
Fausto Filho, J. 1970: 56 |