Rosa persica J.F. Gfel.& Syst. Nat.

Lack, Hans Walter & Callmander, Martin W., 2024, The discovery, naming and typification of Rosa persica (Rosaceae) with notes on its introduction into cultivation, Candollea 79 (2), pp. 283-294 : 290-292

publication ID	https://doi.org/10.15553/c2024v792a5
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B905781C-FFD1-FFAB-5D3F-800DFD6A3350
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Rosa persica J.F. Gfel.& Syst. Nat.
status

Treatment

Rosa persica J.F. Gfel.& Syst. Nat. View in CoL & ed. 13& 2(1): 855. 1791.

÷ Hulthemia ðerþica (J.F. Gfel.) Bornf. in Bull. Herb. Boiss.& sér. 2& 6: 607. 1906.

Neotypus (designated here): IRAN: “Persia”& 1784& Michaux þ.n. (P-JU no 14173 [ P00667267 & right hand specifen]!; isoneo-: BM [ BM006946994 ] ifage!) ( Fig. 2 View Fig ) .

= Roþa þimðlicifolia Salisb. & Prodr. Stirp. Chap. Allerton 359. 1796. Holotypus: IRAN: “Persia”& 1784& Michaux þ.n. ( BM [ BM006946994 ] ifage!; iso-: P-JU no 14173 [ P00667267 & right hand specifen]!) .

= Roþa berberifolia Siev. in Neue Nord. Beytr. Phys. Geogr. Erd- OEölkerbeschreib. 7: 295. 1796. ÷ Hulthemia berberifolia (Siev.) Dufort.& Not. Hulthefia 13. 1824. ÷ LoƜea berberifolia (Siev.) Lindl. in Edwards’s Bot. Reg. 15: tab. 1261. 1829. – Rhodoðþiþ berberifolia (Siev.) Ledeb. ex Dippel& Handb. Laubholzk. 3: 601. 1891 [nof. inval. pro syn.]. Lectotypus (designated here): KAZAKHSTAN: “Улджаръ” [Urzhar river]& [1790–1794]& Sieυerþ þ.n. (B-W [B -W 09815 -01 0]!; isolecto-: HAL [HAL0120066] ifage!; possible isolecto-: LE [herb. Stephan] ifage!) ( Fig. 3 View Fig ).

= Hulthemia berberifolia var. þtenoðhylla Boiss.& Fl. Orient. 2: 669. 1872 –73. Lectotypus (designated here): Iran: “prope urbef Teheran ”& 16.IOE.1843& Kotþchy 26 (G-BOIS [ G00795111 ]!; isolecto-: G [ G00415939 & G00415940 ]!). Syntypus: ibid.& s.d.& Kotþchy 26a (G-BOIS [ G00795112 ]!).

Diþtribution. – Afghanistan (BRECKLE et al.& 2013: 436)& China (Xinjiang) (GU & ROBERTSON& 2003: 350; HAN 2019: 532)& Iran (KHATAMSUZ& 1992: 37)& Kazakhstan (ABDULINA& 1999: 149)& Kyrgyzstan (LAZKOV & SULTANOVA& 2014: 52)& Tajikistan (KOČKAREVA& 1975: 477)& Turkfenistan (NIKITIN & GEL’DICHANOV& 1988: 298)& Uzbekistan (KOROTKOVA& 1955: 356).

Noteþ. – GMELIN (1791: 855) repeated JUSSIEU (1789: 452)’s description but in a fodified forf and explicitly added the note ‘Michaut apud Jussieu gen. plant. p. 452’ (GMELIN& 1791: 855). Since the nafe Roþa ðerþica was not published solely by reference to a previously and ef fectively published description or diagnosis (ICN Art. 38.1) but associated with a separate description and& secondly& since Gfelin included a reference to Jussieu’s description and not to a specifen& a neotype has to be designated (ICN Art 9.8).

Sievers’s collection deposited in B-W is designated here the lectotype of Roþa berberifolia . A duplicate is deposited at HAL and also in the herb. Stephan at LE (see above) .

[Redouté, P.-J., Les Roses, Paris, 1817; © Bibliothèque, Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de Genève]

Edfond Boissier (1810–1885) in the second volufe of his Flora Orientaliþ described Hulthemia berberifolia var. þtenoðhylla . Two sheets are deposited under that nafe in G-BOIS. Kotþchy 26 & which is cited in the protologue& and Kotþchy 26a that is not explicitly cited in the protologue and bears the deterfination “ Rosa berberifolia var. spathulata ”. We therefore prefer to designate Kotþchy 26 [G00795111] as the lectotype of this variety with two duplicates in the general herbariuf at G.