Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis ) plagiata, Madl & Rosa, 2012
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5327908 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5F5263C-AFB8-4F77-8154-00C7CD964CFE |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B2108274-B001-9B57-FF78-6466FDBF645E |
|
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
|
scientific name |
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis ) plagiata |
| status |
|
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis) plagiata n.sp.: MOCSÁRY 1890: 59 (descr., South Africa).
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis) plagiata MOCSÁRY : de DALLA TORRE 1892: 85 (cat.).
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis) plagiata MOCSÁRY : BISCHOFF 1913: 57 (cat.).
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis) plagiata MOCSÁRY : EDNEY 1954a: 547 (key), 592 (tax., descr., South Africa (not Namibia)), 620 (fig. 3g).
Chrysis plagiata MOCSÁRY : KIMSEY & BOHART 1990: 449 (tax., South Africa, cat., ignita group).
* Chrysis inanis n.sp.: du BUYSSON 1900: 146 (descr., South Africa).
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis) inanis du BUYSSON : EDNEY 1954b: 545 (tax.).
Chrysis inanis du BUYSSON : KIMSEY & BOHART 1990: 449 (syn.).
D i s t r i b u t i o n:SouthAfrica.
The record from Kenya mentioned in KIMSEY & BOHART (1990: 449) should be checked. The locality Bot River ( EDNEY 1954a: 593) is situated in South Africa. Therefore Namibia is deleted from the distribution list.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis ) plagiata
| Madl, M. & Rosa, P. 2012 |
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis ) plagiata MOCSÁRY
| EDNEY E 1954: 547 |
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis ) inanis
| EDNEY E 1954: 545 |
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis ) plagiata MOCSÁRY
| BISCHOFF H 1913: 57 |
Chrysis inanis
| BUYSSON R 1900: 146 |
Chrysis ( Tetrachrysis ) plagiata MOCSÁRY
| DALLA TORRE C 1892: 85 |
