Oratosquillina interrupta ( Kemp, 1911 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5637.2.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CC4CC729-4237-4BFC-8A31-249D34BDFB6F |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AF57E704-FFDE-FFDC-2EA2-59DF7FE04025 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Oratosquillina interrupta ( Kemp, 1911 ) |
status |
|
Oratosquillina interrupta ( Kemp, 1911)
( Fig. 3E View FIGURE 3 )
Squilla interrupta Kemp, 1911: 98 .— Kemp 1913: 72, pl. 5 fig. 63–65.
Oratosquillina interrupta .— Ahyong 2001: 293, fig. 142.—Ahyong et al. 2008: 157–158, fig. 124, 125.— Ahyong 2016: 466– 467, fig. 5B.— Trivedi et al. 2020: 229.
Material examined. FSI/ VIZAG / CRUST. 228, 2 males (TL 85–91 mm), 1 female (TL 110 mm), 16°53.2’N, 82°36.3’E, 115–119 m, coll. K. Silambarasan, 28 December 2020 GoogleMaps .
Remarks. The present specimen agrees with published accounts ( Ahyong 2001; Ahyong et al. 2008).Abdominal spination is as follows: submedian 5–6, intermediate 4–6, lateral 3–6, marginal 1–5.
Distribution. Persian Gulf, India, eastwards to Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, and Australia ( Ahyong 2016; Trivedi et al., 2020).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Oratosquillina interrupta ( Kemp, 1911 )
Silambarasan, Krishnan, Kar, A. B., Prasad, G. V. A., Pattnayak, S. K. & Jeyabaskaran, R. 2025 |
Oratosquillina interrupta
Trivedi, J. N. & Ahyong, S. T. & Vachhrajani, K. D. & Biju Kumar, A. 2020: 229 |
Ahyong, S. T. 2016: 466 |
Ahyong, S. T. 2001: 293 |
Squilla interrupta
Kemp, S. 1913: 72 |
Kemp, S. 1911: 98 |