Mandevilla laxa (Ruiz & Pav.) Woodson, Ann.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.17348/jbrit.v19.i1.1391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A47A87B5-FF9D-1E6F-FFBF-FD1E6467FBB0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Mandevilla laxa (Ruiz & Pav.) Woodson, Ann. |
status |
|
Mandevilla laxa (Ruiz & Pav.) Woodson, Ann. View in CoL Missouri Bot. Gard. 19:68. 1932. Echites laxus Ruiz & Pav., Fl.Peruv. 2:19, pl. 134. 1799. TYPE: PERÚ. Huancavélica: Chancahuasi, 1787 (fl), H. Ruiz & J. PavÓn 11/55 (HOLOTYPE: MA barcode #814490, photo F neg. 29219).
Distribution. — Southwestern Perú, Bolivia, and northern Argentina [but cultivated in many countries], at 1700–3100 m.
Discussion. — Potgieter and Zarucchi (1999) cited this species as native based on Steyermark 53292. However, this specimen was obtained from a market, as stated on the label [‘cultivada y vendida en un mercado’/cultivated and sold in a market]. I have not seen any other specimens to confirm that M. laxa is native to Ecuador. In Perú, gatherings from this species have been collected in the southwestern area of the country. Based on the available evidence, M. laxa should be excluded from the native flora of Ecuador.
Specimen examined: ECUADOR. Azuay : Cuenca,cultivada y vendida en un mercado, 1 Jul 1943 (fl), Steyermark 53292 ( NY, US) .
NY |
William and Lynda Steere Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Mandevilla laxa (Ruiz & Pav.) Woodson, Ann.
Morales, J. Francisco 2025 |
Mandevilla laxa (Ruiz & Pav.)
Woodson 1932: 68 |