Phanerotomella exilicornis, He & Achterberg & He & Tang & Chen, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1002.2949 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28366AFF-A77F-4036-8CF8-ACABEEA5BEAB |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9F7587EE-FF02-6839-9477-2CF3FABFD7D5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phanerotomella exilicornis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phanerotomella exilicornis sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9155EF2B-0F92-4AF0-A5FD-B2262B9D17C9
Diagnosis
Scapus and pedicellus in lateral view ivory and distinctly contrasting with dark brown flagellum ( Fig. 32D View Fig ); mesopleuron reticulate and without smooth and shiny area posteriorly ( Fig. 32J View Fig ); lamella of third metasomal tergite not protruding medio-apically ( Fig. 32L View Fig ); clypeus in lateral view less protruding ( Fig. 32C View Fig ); temple distinctly rugulose and matt ( Fig. 32C View Fig ).
Etymology
Named after its slender antenna; ‘ exilis ’ is Latin for ‘slender’.
Type material
Holotype
CHINA – Hainan • ♀; Shuimanxiang, Wuzhi Mt. ; 16–18 May 2007; J. Zeng leg.; ZJUH No. 200807665.
Paratypes (2 ♀♀)
CHINA – Hainan • 1 ♀; Shuiman, Wuzhi Mt. ; 16 May 2007; J. Zeng leg.; ZJUH No. 200705124 • 1 ♀; Yinggeling ; 24–25 May 2007; J.X. Liu leg.; ZJUH No. 200702676 .
Description
Female
MEASUREMENTS. Length of body 3.0 mm, fore wing 2.6 mm.
COLOURATION. Black; head reddish brown and darkened around occipital carina, but face yellowish brown and clypeus yellow; antenna dark brown except for white scapus and pedicellus; mandible yellowish and with reddish teeth; metasoma ventrally white or ivory; fore and middle legs brown except coxa, trochanter and base of tibia white, tarsus pale yellow; hind leg dark brown except base of coxa, trochanter and base of tibia white, tarsus pale yellow; pterostigma and parastigma brown, wing veins pale brown.
HEAD ( Fig. 32A–C View Fig ). Width 1.4 × median length in anterior view ( Fig. 32B View Fig ) and part of head above eye in lateral view 0.3 × height of eye ( Fig. 32C View Fig ); antenna with 35+ segments, not widened and only shortened medially, gradually narrowing apically, subapical segments non-moniliform and slightly longer than wide, third, fourth, tenth and fifteenth segments 4.0, 3.7, 1.8 and 1.5× as long as wide in lateral view, respectively ( Fig. 32D View Fig ); area of stemmaticum transversely striate; OOL: OD: POL=35: 11: 8; eye 1.6× as long as temple in dorsal view ( Fig. 32A View Fig ); frons transversely rugulose and with median carina; vertex reticulate-rugose with short setae; temple rugulose and matt; face rugulose and with distinct median ridge, dorsally connected to median carina; clypeus smooth and shiny except for finely punctation, truncate medio-ventrally; eye width in lateral view 1.5× maximum width of temple ( Fig. 32C View Fig ), eye height in anterior view 0.8× minimum width of face ( Fig. 32B View Fig ); malar space rugulose and 1.2× as long as basal width of mandible; mandible rather slender, lower tooth of mandible 0.4× as long as apical tooth ( Fig. 32F View Fig ); face width equal to height of face and clypeus together.
MESOSOMA ( Fig. 32I–J View Fig ). Length 1.2× its width in lateral view ( Fig. 32J View Fig ); side of pronotum mainly superficially and finely punctate except anteriorly rugulose; mesoscutum regularly and densely reticulate; notauli absent; scutellar sulcus with six short crenulae ( Fig. 32I View Fig ); scutellum reticulate; mesopleuron densely and regularly reticulate and without smooth and shiny area posteriorly, precoxal sulcus absent; propodeum reticulate, without median carina, with irregular transverse carina connected to four weak and blunt lateral tubercles.
WINGS ( Fig. 32G–H View Fig ). Fore wing 2.7× as long as its maximum width ( Fig. 32G View Fig ); second submarginal cell weakly petiolate; vein m-cu weakly postfurcal; vein r, SR1 and 1-SR+M straight; length of 1-R1 1.2 × pterostigma; vein r issued far beyond middle of pterostigma, 1.3× vein r-m; r: 2-SR: SR1 =17: 39: 67; vein 1-CU1 0.4× as long as vein 2-CU1. Hind wing: M+CU: 1-M: 1r-m =28: 40: 12 ( Fig. 32H View Fig ).
LEGS ( Fig. 32E View Fig ). Hind femur 3.7× as long as wide; longest spur of hind tibia 0.6 × as long as its basitarsus; hind leg smooth and shiny except fine and superficial punctation; middle tibia without ivory blister.
METASOMA ( Fig. 32K–L View Fig ). Oval in dorsal view ( Fig. 32K View Fig ), carapace 1.7× as long as wide and as long as mesosoma; first to third tergites densely reticulate-rugose; third tergite 0.8× as long as second tergite, medial length of third tergite 0.5× its maximum width; lamella of third tergite not protruding medio-apically and with pair of small and blunt tubercles latero-apically ( Fig. 32L View Fig ).
VARIATION. Vein m-cu of fore wing weakly antefurcal or interstitial.
Male
Unknown.
Host
Unknown.
Distribution
China (Hainan).
Remarks
Phanerotomella exilicornis sp. nov. is similar to P. albiscapa ( Ashmead, 1905) because of the slender antenna of the female, all flagellum segments are longer than wide and the subapical segments non-moniliform, the posterior ocelli are large and round, and the temple in dorsal view narrows posteriorly. However, P. exilicornis can easily be distinguished from P. albiscapa by the scapus and pedicellus in lateral view being ivory and distinctly contrasting with the dark brown flagellum (antenna brown in the latter), the mesopleuron without a smooth and shiny area posteriorly (with a smooth area in the latter), the lamella of the third metasomal tergite not protruding medio-apically (protruding medio-apically in the latter), and the temple distinctly rugulose and matt (superficially rugulose and shiny in the latter).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.