Monstrilla fisgata, Suárez-Morales & P.M.B, 2025

Suárez-Morales, Eduardo & P. M. B, Alexander David Mckinnon, 2025, The Australian Monstrilloida 3. Caromiobenella Jeon, Lee & Soh, 2018, Monstrilla Dana, 1849, and Sarsimonstrillus n. gen., Zootaxa 5576 (1), pp. 1-99 : 47-48

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5576.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7A65A968-EF09-4F1A-AF0D-470BDF2EE1DD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14762964

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D7DA92F-FF83-855B-89AE-5A5793A1FF50

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Monstrilla fisgata
status

sp. nov.

Monstrilla fisgata sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1E767B0A-860B-4068-811D-7BBCB93D0BF6

( Figs. 29–31 View FIGURE 29 View FIGURE 30 View FIGURE 31 )

Material examined. Adult male holotype, undissected, mounted on slide in glycerine, (ECO-CHZ-12533).

Type locality. Western Port Bay , Victoria, Australia (38°23.115’ S, 145°25.371’ E) coll. on 17 June 1985 GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis. Small (total length <1 mm) male monstrilloid with relatively short, slender cephalothorax, less than half of total body length; forehead flat in ventral view, projected anteriorly in lateral view, ornamented with few integumental ridges and pair of sensilla. Urosome relatively short, robust, about 1/4 of total body length. Oral cone moderately protuberant; preoral ventral surface ornamentation comprising pair of hyaline bodies, medial subtriangular protuberance, pair of nipple-like integumental processes and adjacent field of deep integumental wrinkles. Dorsal anterior surface ornamented with field of wart-like integumental processes. Antennules short, 5- segmented; fifth segment geniculate, with simple setae only. Fifth pedigerous somite with straight lateral margins, ventral surface smooth; genital somite carrying short, compact genital complex comprising robust, short shaft and pair of thick, thumb-shaped genital lappets curved inwards as pincer, the latter with distal half coarsely ridged along outer and inner margins, unornamented, medially connected by large globose process furnished with crescent-shaped integumental scars, and forming three-pointed chitinized process apically. Caudal rami armed with 6 caudal setae subequal in length and width.

Description of male holotype. Body relatively slender, small. Total body length of holotype 0.92 mm in dorsal view. Cephalothorax almost 45% of total body length ( Fig. 29A View FIGURE 29 ), with flat forehead in dorsal and ventral position, ornamented with pair of sensilla ( Fig. 30C View FIGURE 30 ); in lateral view forehead projected anteriorly ( Fig. 29A, B View FIGURE 29 ); projected section comprising hyaline bodies (sensu Suárez-Morales 2018) (phb in Fig. 29A, B View FIGURE 29 ); fused first pedigerous somite with posterodistal corners weakly expanded, reaching proximal 1/3 of succeeding second pedigerous somite. Eye cups and field of wart-like integumental processes on anteriormost dorsal surface (warts in Fig. 29A View FIGURE 29 ). Preoral ventral surface integumental ornamentation comprising: (1) medial protuberant process (pp in Fig. 29A, B View FIGURE 29 ), (2) pair of nipple-like processes (nlp in Figs. 29A, B View FIGURE 29 , 31C View FIGURE 31 ), (3) dense field of longitudinal wrinkles, single medial oral pore (op in Fig. 30C View FIGURE 30 ), pair of ventral pores (vpore in Fig. 30C View FIGURE 30 ), and (4) pair of hyaline bodies (sensu Suárez-Morales, 2018) between bases of antennules and medial keel ( Fig. 29A, B View FIGURE 29 ).

Oral cone moderately protuberant, robust, with wide base and adjacent integumental wrinkles (oc in Figs. 29A, B View FIGURE 29 , 30C View FIGURE 30 ). Eyes comprising large medial cup with smaller adjacent lateral cups, weakly pigmented (mec, lec in Fig. 30C View FIGURE 30 ). Urosome relatively short, 24% of total body length, comprising fifth pedigerous somite, genital somite, one free somite, preanal and anal somites, the latter holding pair of caudal rami; relative length of urosomites, from proximal to distal: 36.4: 20.3: 16.5: 14.4: 12.4: = 100. Fifth pedigerous somite longest, with straight lateral margins, ventral surface smooth, lacking any vestige of fifth legs ( Fig. 29G View FIGURE 29 ). Genital somite carrying genital complex. Succeeding preanal and anal somites smooth; anal somite carrying caudal rami.

Genital complex ventrally on genital somite ( Fig. 29G View FIGURE 29 ), complex comprising short thick strongly globose shaft with smooth lateral margins; shaft curved posteriorly, distally branching into pair of short, thumb-like symmetrical, slightly divergent genital lappets curving inwards ( Figs. 29G View FIGURE 29 , 30D View FIGURE 30 ) and reaching posterior margin of succeeding urosomite ( Fig. 31B View FIGURE 31 ); lappets inner margin coarsely corrugate, medially conjoined ( Fig. 30D View FIGURE 30 ), unornamented, medially connected by large globose process furnished with crescent-shaped integumental scars, and forming distinctive three-pointed chitinized process apically (arrows in Figs. 30D View FIGURE 30 , 31B View FIGURE 31 ). Caudal rami armed with 6 caudal setae (setae I–VI) subequal in length and width ( Figs. 29G View FIGURE 29 , 31D View FIGURE 31 ); proximal part of setae III and IV weakly swollen ( Fig. 31D View FIGURE 31 ).

Antennules short, 0.58 mm long, less than 36% of total body length, 5-segmented, segments 1–5 clearly divided ( Fig. 30A View FIGURE 30 ). Following nomenclature by Grygier & Ohtsuka (1995), first segment lacking element 1; second segment carrying short setiform elements 2d 1,2 and 2v 1–3 and long, lightly setulated dorsal seta IId; third segment with long, smooth setiform element 3 and lightly setulated setiform elements IIIv and IIId; fourth segment longest, armature including proximal elements 4v 1, 4d 1,2 and 4v 2, 3 ( Fig. 30A View FIGURE 30 ), proximal half with inner margin expanded (arrow in Fig. 31A View FIGURE 31 ), fifth segment geniculate ( Fig. 31A View FIGURE 31 ). Following Huys et al.’s (2007) nomenclature for the setation of the male antennulary fifth segment, inner margin with short, slender seta A on subdistal inner margin, next to subdistal setae B and C; inner setae unbranched; outer margin with short, slender seta 5, followed by simple setae 4, 3, 2, apical spiniform element 1, and short aesthetasc AE 1 ( Fig. 30B View FIGURE 30 ).

Swimming legs 1–4 as in M. sekiguchii sp. nov. in armature pattern and leg segmentation. Outer apical spines of legs 1–4 third exopodal segments of M. fisgata sp. nov., modified, spines with attenuated distal half, forming a whip-like filament. Distal narrowing of the spine is not present in legs 1 and 2 ( Fig. 29 D View FIGURE 29 ), but observable in legs 3 and 4 ( Fig. 29 E, F View FIGURE 29 ).

Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the nominal Latin term fisga, a three-pronged harpoon, refers to the three-points apical tip of the genital lappets, a distinctive character of this species. The gender is feminine.

Remarks. The male of M. fisgata sp. nov. has distinctive features that make it readily distinguishable from its congeneric species and support its status as a new member of Monstrilla . Firstly, is the modified tip of the genital lappets, comprising a set of three chitinized points. In some other species of monstrilloids these structures can exhibit ornamentations like wart-like integumental processes as in the Australian C. jeoni sp. nov. ( Fig. 5F View FIGURE 5 ), distal spermatophore spines like in the males of M. grandis (Ramírez 1971; Suárez-Morales & Üstün 2018), M. longicornis ( Sars, 1921) , M. papilliremis ( Isaac, 1975) , M. longiremis ( Suárez-Morales, 2010) , M. chetumalensis (see Suárez-Morales & Castellanos, 2019, fig. 1C–E), and the Australian M. mammillata sp. nov. (to be described) or the distally corrugate and apically attenuate lappet tips of the Caribbean M. marioi ( Suárez-Morales, 2003) . Secondly, the anteriorly directed forehead comprising the eyes with the densely ornamented dorsal and ventral surfaces, and thirdly, the attenuate outer apical spines on the third exopodal segments of legs 3 and 4. These spines vary in size, from almost as long or as long as the carrying segment, like in the Caribbean M. elongata (see Suárez-Morales, 1994, fig. 2 J–L), M. mahahualensis Suárez-Morales, 2022 (see Suárez-Morales, 2022, fig. 2E), and M. xcalakensis (see Suárez-Morales, 2024, fig. 3D) or shorter than the segment like in the Philippine M. grygieri Suárez-Morales, 2000 (Suárez-Morales 2000, fig. 1D–G). Overall, the combination of these characters in the new species appears to be unique among the known species of Monstrilla .

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF