Miomantinae Westwood, 1889: 17

Borer, Matthias & Ehrmann, Reinhard, 2022, Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Parasphendale Schulthess- Schindler, 1898 (Mantodea: Miomantidae) with description of a new species from East Africa, Faunitaxys 10 (34), pp. 1-29 : 2-4

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.57800/faunitaxys-10(34)

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/822887BC-E713-FFBF-5EF3-FD0EE2B1F998

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Miomantinae Westwood, 1889: 17
status

 

Subfamily Miomantinae Westwood, 1889: 17 View in CoL .

Genus Parasphendale Schulthess-Schindler, 1898: 39 View in CoL (2): 177-178.

Type species

Mantis vincta Gerst. (female). In: Gerstaecker, 1869: 209-210, #24.

Mantis vincta Gerst. (female). In: Gerstaecker, 1873: 14-15, #24, Taf. I., Fig. 6 View Fig .

Mantis (Photina) agrionina Gerst. (male). In: Gerstaecker, 1869: 209, #23.

Mantis (Photina) agrionina Gerst. (male) In: Gerstaecker, 1873: 13-14, #23.

Mantis (Sphendale) vincta Gerst., 1873 , Bd. III (2): 14. Taf. I., Fig. 6 View Fig . In: Schulthess-Schindler, 1898: 177.

Synonyms

Parasphendale agrionina (male and female) Gerstaecker, 1869.

= Mantis (Photina) agrionina (male) Gerstaecker. In: Gerstaecker, 1869: 209, #23.

= Miopteryx agrionina , Miomantis ? agrionina Gerst. Sansibar. In: Saussure, 1870: 238.

= Iris? vincta Gerst. , Miomantis agrionina Gerst. Zanzibar. In: Saussure, 1871a: 115, 121.

= Iris vincta, In : Saussure, 1871b: 300-302.

= Mantis vincta Gerst. , Miomantis agrionina Gerst. , Miopterxy? agrionina , Zanzibar. In: Saussure, 1871c: 263, 269.

= Iris vincta . In: Saussure, 1871d: 426.

= Mantis (Photina) agrionina (male) Gerstaecker. In: Gerstaecker, 1873: 13-14, #23.

= Mantis vincta (female) Gerstaecker.In: Gerstaecker, 1869: 209-210, #24. = Mantis vincta (female) Gerstaecker. In: Gerstaecker, 1873: 14-15, #24, Taf. I., Fig. 6 View Fig .

= Mantis (Sphendale) vincta Gerst., 1873 , Bd. III (2): 14. Taf. I., Fig. 6 View Fig . In: Schulthess-Schindler, 1898: 177.

= Iris vincta Gerstaecker : 209. In: Westwood, 1889: 8.

= Miomantis agrionina e? (female). In: Westwood, 1889: 8.

= Fischeria vincta Gerstaecker. In : Westwood, 1889: 9.

= Miomantis agrionina Gerstaecker. In : Westwood, 1889: 18.

= Miomantis vincta Gerstaecker. In : Westwood, 1889: 18.

= Miomantis vincta Gerst. , Miomantis agrionina Gerst. , Sansibar, Mozambique, Carvilia vincta Gerst. In : Saussure, 1898: 196.

= Carvilia Stål [ vincta Gerst. ] (female). In: Saussure, In: Voeltzkow, 1899: 587-588.

= Carvilia View in CoL (sp. Carvilia vincta ) (female) (nec Stål). In: Kirby, 1904: 266.

= Photina agrionina Gerst. In : Werner, 1906: 368-369.

= Parasphendale (Carvilia) vincta (male), In: Werner, 1906: 369.

Remarks. – Gerstaecker, A. (1873) adds an important note on page 15. Quote: “Anmerkung: Trotz der auffallenden Form-, Färbungs- und Zeichnungsunterschiede, welche zwischen der vorstehend beschriebenen Art und Mant. agrionina vorhanden sind, wäre es immerhin nicht undenkbar, dass beide als Männchen und Weibchen einer und derselbenArt angehören. Für diesen Fall würde der Name Mantis vincta für dieselbe einzutreten haben.“

We share the doubts of Gerstaecker, quoted in 1873, concerning the validity of Mantis (Photina) agrionina . So, as he postulated in the above quote, the name Mantis vincta as type species is valid.

Furthermore, the " Carvilia " named by Stål (1876, 1877) do not refer to the genus Parasphendale sensu Schulthess-Schindler (1898) . Figures 35 - 46 View Fig show the type specimens of the two closely related species Parasphendale affinis Giglio-Tos 1915 and Parasphendale vincta .

Diagnosis. – Medium to large size. Male slender, female robust. Head broader than long. Frontal shield strongly transverse and narrow. Vertex straight in male, convex in female. Eyes in male round and exophthalmic, in female flatter. Pronotum moderately slender, longer than anterior coxa, with distinct, short supracoxal extension, sides at least in female toothed, prozone sometimes granulate. Wings in males exceeding the abdomen, forewings narrow, their costal field subopaque, with parallel veins, hindwings hyaline. Wings in females not reaching the end of the abdomen, forewings opaque, often with pale transverse bands, at most a little longer than pronotum. Hindwings dark, with pale transverse bands. Anterior coxae strongly dentated especially in female, with divergent inner apical lobes, the metazone of the pronotum not or only slightly surpassing. Anterior femora with 4 discoidal and 4 posteroventral spines, granulated between the latter. The tibial spur groove situated proximal to the middle of the tibia. Fore tibiae broad, with 7 posteroventral spines. Meso- and metathoracic legs conspicuously short. Supra-anal plate broader than long. Cerci rather long and simple.

Distribution. – Burundi, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Somalia, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Mantodea

Family

Miomantidae

Loc

Miomantinae Westwood, 1889: 17

Borer, Matthias & Ehrmann, Reinhard 2022
2022
Loc

Carvilia

Kirby W. F. 1904: 266
1904
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF