Neoseiulus longispinosus (Evans)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.24349/yk4c-l3jb |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7C77BE7E-1441-FF80-FE4B-2A1E83AAFD8C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neoseiulus longispinosus (Evans) |
status |
|
Neoseiulus longispinosus (Evans) View in CoL
Typhlodromus longispinosus Evans 1952: 413 ; Evans 1953: 465 ; Womersley 1954: 177 ; Ehara
1958: 55.
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) longispinosus, Chant 1959: 74 .
Amblyseius longispinosus, Corpuz & Rimando 1966: 129 ; Schicha 1975: 103.
Neoseiulus longispinosus, Moraes et al. 1986: 85 View in CoL ; 2000: 245 ; Chant & McMurtry 2003: 37 ; Moraes et al. 2004b: 129 ; Chant and McMurtry 2007: 29.
This species belongs to the barkeri View in CoL species group and to the womersleyi species subgroup, as the calyx is markedly constricted at the junction with the atrium, the atrium is deeply forked at the junction with the major duct, and the major duct, atrium, and calyx are not of the same width ( Chant and McMurtry 2003).
This species is widely distributed in many countries of the world, mainly in tropical areas ( Moraes et al. 2000 ; Mailloux et al. 2010 ; Kreiter et al. 2013, 2018 a, c; Demite et al. 2024).
It was found rarely in surveys made in Guadeloupe, Martinique and La Réunion, except in studies on companion plants in citrus orchards ( Mailloux et al. 2010 ; Kreiter et al. 2013, 2018c ; Le Bellec et al., unpub. data). The species seems to be more common on weeds with populations of tetranychid mites. Neoseiulus longispinosus , a type II phytoseiid predatory mite, like N. californicus ( McMurtry et al. 2013) , has received increasing attention in Asia since 2010 for the control of different spider mites (of genera Eutetranychus , Oligonychus , and Tetranychus ) ( Nusartlert et al. 2011). The feeding, development, predation, cannibalism, intra-guild predation and behaviour have been extensively studied by several authors (see for exampleLuong et al. 2017) for pest control purposes. Neoseiulus longispinosus is well-known as a BCAused in many countries worldwide for spider mite management. A recent study by Huyen et al. (2017) have shown that, at least in controlled laboratory conditions, N. longispinosus is apotential biological control agent against the citrus red mite, P. citri .
Tetranychus urticae View in CoL is a major pest of papaya in south Florida, where Neoseiulus longispinosus View in CoL , a newly naturalized predator, has become the most abundant predator associated with this pest. Single releases of N. longispinosus View in CoL significantly suppressed TSSM populations. That study demonstrated that N. longispinosus View in CoL has the potential to control TSSM on papaya, but the level of control can be negatively affected by high levels of cannibalism at low prey densities, as well as intraguild predation by aggressive intraguild predators, like A. swirskii ( Döker et al. 2021) View in CoL .
This is the first record of this species in Ivory Coast.
Specimens examined — 45 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ collected between 14/III/2017 and 10/III/2018
in Abidjan, Anyama Ahoue (aasl 42 m, Lat 5°26′00.87″N, Long 3°55′00.60″W), on Carica papaya L.
World distribution — Australia, China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Yunnan), Cuba, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Grande Comore Island ( Comoros), Guadeloupe Island ( France), Hawaii, Hong Kong, India (Andaman Islands, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar Pradesh, Kerala, Orissa, Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh), Indonesia, Japan, Les Saintes Islands ( France), Malaysia, Marie-Galante Island ( France), Martinique ( France), New Zealand, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, La Réunion Island ( France), Rodrigues Island ( Mauritius), Russia (Primorsky Territory), Saint-Barthélémy Island ( France), South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, USA (Florida), Vietnam.
Remarks — The measurements of the female and male specimens from Ivory Coast ( Table 1 and 2) overlap with those obtained from populations in various countries. These measurements are close to those obtained for specimens from FCI and La Réunion Island.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neoseiulus longispinosus (Evans)
K, Moustapha Touré, KwadjoK, Koffi Eric, DoumbiaK, Mamadou & KreiterK, Serge 2025 |
Neoseiulus longispinosus
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2007: 29 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 129 |
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2003: 37 |
Moraes G. J. de & Kreiter S. & Lofego A. C. 2000: 245 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 85 |
Amblyseius longispinosus
Schicha E. 1975: 103 |
Corpuz L. A. & Rimando L. 1966: 129 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) longispinosus
Chant D. A. 1959: 74 |
Typhlodromus longispinosus
Womersley H. 1954: 177 |
Evans G. O. 1953: 465 |
Evans G. O. 1952: 413 |