Variodens inopinatus, ROBINSON, 1957
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12458 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/760A879E-FF84-547E-0858-FD01FE5FFB9B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Variodens inopinatus |
status |
|
VARIODENS INOPINATUS ROBINSON, 1957 B
FIG. 7A – C View Figure 7
Referred material: Specimen BATGM CD4, an anterior mid-region fragment of a left dentary from Holwell ‘ Microlestes ’ quarry, Somerset, UK ( Fig. View Figure 7
7A – C).
Remarks: BATGM CD4 is a left dentary with a different tooth implantation than is found in the other jaws. There is a clear Meckelian canal ( Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ), and on the labial side a foramen has a deep groove that is directed posteriorly ( Fig. 7B View Figure 7 ). The dentition is ankylothecodont, with the base of the teeth ankylosed on the dental shelf rather than to a labial wall, and with the base of the tooth lying below the surface of the bone. From the broken tooth it is clear that they sit and are ankylosed in shallow alveoli ( Fig. 7C View Figure 7 ). One tooth, identified as emergent because it is significantly below the estimated full heights of the teeth on either side, has a tricuspid apex, but the others are too damaged to describe any details of cusps. The emerging tooth has a wear facet on the central cusp and there is ankylosing bone formed around the base on the labial side. The two teeth behind the tricuspid are larger, and these three teeth have a slightly more ovoid base, wider transversely than anteroposteriorly, compared with the more anterior first tooth that is subconical. Also, the teeth bases form a pattern with the two larger posterior teeth lying almost the entire width across the jaw, with their medial side near to or at the lingual margin; the two anterior teeth are emplaced more mid-dentary, and the medial bases do not come as close to the lingual edge.
This specimen is clearly referable to V. inopinatus , and from the description of the paratype NMHUK PV R36849 by Robinson (1957b), we can judge that it is from the anterior mid-region behind the symphysis roughly in tooth positions 5 – 8. The anteroposterior lengths of the tooth bases fit the pattern of size in the paratype, with the smallest tooth in the sixth position between a larger anterior tooth and posteriorly the largest teeth. The fully erupted teeth are in the same size range (~0.4 – 0.6 mm) as found in the paratype. The emerging tooth conforms to Robinson’s view that tooth replacement was frequent in this species, and the wear on the middle cusp of the tricuspid ( Fig. 7C View Figure 7 ) also accords with the paratype ( Robinson, 1957b: table, p. 284).
SUBCLASS PARAREPTILIA OLSON, 1947 SUPERFAMILY PROCOLOPHONOIDEA ROMER, 1956 FAMILY PROCOLOPHONIDAE SEELEY, 1888 PROCOLOPHONID INDET.
FIG. 7D – F View Figure 7
Remarks: BATGM CD8 is a jaw fragment with four robust teeth ( Fig. 7D – F View Figure 7 ). The dental implantation is acrodont but the teeth are more columnar than the triangular shape of the sphenodontians, such as Clevosaurus and Diphydontosaurus . There are no ridges characteristic of Planocephalosaurus , and there is a lack of wear on the jaws from occlusion found in the sphenodontians. Rather, it is the type of acrodonty described for the procolophonid Soturnia by Cabreira & Cisneros (2009). One of the teeth has a wear facet on the labial side, and from this and the Meckelian groove we have identified the specimen as the anterior of a right dentary. There are no distinguishing apomorphies that can assign this specimen to a specific genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Variodens inopinatus
Whiteside, David I. & Duffin, Christopher J. 2017 |
PROCOLOPHONOIDEA
ROMER 1956 |
PARAREPTILIA
OLSON 1947 |
PROCOLOPHONIDAE
SEELEY 1888 |