Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva and Grazia, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2021.2013970 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15500855 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7238B639-DD1D-FFC6-FEE3-FF53FEDCFCE9 |
treatment provided by |
Luisschmitz |
scientific name |
Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva and Grazia, 2002 |
status |
|
Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva and Grazia, 2002 ( Figures 11c View Figure 11 , 12c View Figure 12 , 13f View Figure 13 , 16 View Figure 16 , 17 View Figure 17 , 27a–f View Figure 27 , 28b View Figure 28 , 29 View Figure 29 ; Table 2)
Mecocephala rubripes Pirán 1967: 21 (non Berg 1894: 18; Schwertner et al. 2002: 169–170, 181, 183).
Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva et al. 2002a: 216–220, figs 1, 2, 5, 13, 20, 27, 34, 44, 48, 53, 60; Ruschel et al. 2013: 555, fig. 2e; Barros et al. 2020b: 330, fig. 3B.
Material examined. BRAZIL: RIO GRANDE DO SUL: Holotype, f*, Pelotas , 5 May 1961, C.M. Biezanko leg. ( MCNZ –182381) <illustrated specimen> . Paratypes, BRAZIL: PARANÁ: m*m* f*f*f*, Curitiba , September 1961, S. Laroca leg. ( UFRG) ; m*, Barigui, 15 Octuber 1944/ guarda-chuva // Mecocephala acuminata Dallas ( UFRG) ; RIO GRANDE DO SUL: Imbé, m*, Albatroz , 6 November 1973, R. Wagner Hanisch leg. ( UFRG), <illustrated specimen> ; Porto Alegre, f*, 18 Octuber 1948 ( MCNZ –002804) ; Pelotas , m*, April 1990, M.H. Tedesco leg. ( MCNZ) ; m*, 6 Octuber 1990, C. Antonelli leg. ( UFRG) ; m*, 20 June 1990, V. Pontes leg. ( UFRG) ; m*, April 1985 ( UFRG) ; m*, 10 Octuber 1960, Irigon leg. ( UFRG) ; m*, 15 June 1951, C.M. Biezanko leg. ( MECB) ; m*, 12 June 1957, C. Biezanko leg. ( MACN), <photo examined> ; f*, 10 Octuber 1984, W. Treviso leg. ( UFRG), <illustrated specimen> ; f*, 4 May, M.S. Souza leg. ( UFRG) ; f*, 2 Octuber 1993, P. Timm leg. ( UFRG) ; f*, 15 Octuber 1985, J. Vargas leg. ( UFRG) .
No data: 1 m *, geni.[talia] prep.[arada] ( UFRG), <illustrated specimen>.
Omitted type material. BRAZIL: RIO GRANDE DO SUL: m*, Pelotas, 11.024, I.A.S // Coll. MRCN–002803 // Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva and Grazia, 2002 / Paratype ( UFRG) ; f*, 10 Octuber 1949, Biezanko leg. // Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva and Grazia, 2002 / Paratype ( UFRG), [without abdomen], <illustrated specimen> .
Diagnosis. Body colour dark brown to reddish-dark brown ( Figures 16a–c View Figure 16 , 17a–c View Figure 17 ). Apex of mandibular plates convex. Clypeus uniformly wider ( Figure 11c View Figure 11 ). Anterolateral margins of pronotum straight to slight concave; outline crenulate, punctate ( Figure 11c View Figure 11 ). Each peritreme of ESES reaching about 2/3 of the distance to lateral margin of evaporatorium, median furrow of each peritreme short, reaching less than half of peritreme; outer margins of metapleural evaporatorium straight to slight convex; evaporatorium on mesopleuron reaching the posterolateral angles and outer margin ( Figure 13f View Figure 13 ). Foveae equal to the diameter of a compound eye ( Figures 16a View Figure 16 , 17a View Figure 17 ). Legs not concolourous with body ventral colour ( Figures 16b View Figure 16 , 17b View Figure 17 ). Hemelytra surpassing apex of the body ( Figures 16a View Figure 16 , 17a View Figure 17 ). Trichobothria separated by the imaginary longitudinal line tangent to the spiracles.
Male genitalia. Pygophore trapezoidal, posterolateral angles rounded to quadrate ( Figures 16d–f View Figure 16 , 17d–f View Figure 17 ). Genital cup narrow, occupying less than half the length of pygophore. Medial region of dorsal rim notched, and extension of dorsal rim well developed ( Figures 16d View Figure 16 , 17d View Figure 17 ). Area between layers of ventral rim excavated. Superior layer of ventral rim covering parameres, with two pairs of processes ( Figures 16e View Figure 16 , 17f View Figure 17 ). Inferior layer of ventral rim without processes ( Figure 16f View Figure 16 ). Phallus ( Figure 27a–f View Figure 27 ): Dorsal connectives longer, surpassing the distal half of phallotheca. Processus capitati long, surpassing the phallotheca distal margin. Conjunctiva with two pairs of processes, each acute apically, and three pairs of lobes: median sclerotised apically and lateral and ventral lobes, membranous.
Female genitalia. Posterior margins of valvifers 8 sinuous. Laterotergites 8 with posterior margins straight to slightly obtusely projected, and with a process on each anterior angle. Anterior margins of valvifers 9 straight and posterior margins straight to convex ( Figure 16g –h View Figure 16 ). Laterotergites 9 surpassing the abdominal tergite 8. Diameter of proximal ductus receptaculi as large as the diameter of the inner ductus of vesicular area. Annular flanges convergent related to each other. Capsula seminalis smaller than the pars intermedialis ( Figure 28b View Figure 28 ).
Measurements. See Table 2.
Distribution. Brazil (Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio Grande do Sul) ( Figure 29 View Figure 29 ).
Remarks. This species shows chromatic variation, regarding its cuticle colour, presenting dark brown to black specimens and reddish specimens ( Figures 16–17 View Figure 16 View Figure 17 ).
The melanic and reddish specimens also present small differences in the size and shape of some structures (i.e. outline of dorsal rim of pygophore and posterolateral angles of pygophore). The extension of the dorsal rim is well developed, in a biconvex projection, in all specimens and presents variation in the width of the apical projections, and in the colour. The phallus is variable in outline and degree of sclerotisation. The articulatory apparatus of the phallus is variable in width, and with dorsal connective and processus capitati of variable length. The projections and processes of phallotheca and conjunctiva also present small variations in length and width ( Figure 27a–f View Figure 27 ). Lateral and posterior margins of valvifers 8 and 9 with slightly variable outline.
Despite these variations, the distributional overlap of the two forms and the interchanging combinations of characteristics do not allow the reliable separation of these forms into different taxonomic entities.
Comments. Frey-da-Silva et al. (2002a) examined the male specimen designated as the allotype of Mecocephala rubripes by Pirán (1967). The M. rubripes holotype is a female and was not found in museums in Argentina. According to Berg̍s original description (1894), Frey-da-Silva et al. (2002a) concluded that it was not the same species, proposing a new species.
Ruschel et al. (2013), on the types of Hemiptera deposited in the collection of the Museu de Ciências Naturais da Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul, listed three species of Paramecocephala and made the following observations: for P. bergrothi , the holotype, with the following labels: ‘[Pelotas, 5 May 1961, RG do Sul, CM Biezanko leg.] [ Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva and Grazia, Holotype] [ MCNZ 182381]̍, it is a female specimen and not a male as mentioned in the original description ( Frey-da-Silva et al. 2002a, p. 220). A male paratype with the labels: ‘[Pelotas, April 90, Tedesco, M.H. leg.] [Genit. Prep.] [ Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva and Grazia, 2002, Paratype]̍ is missing the genital capsule and has a collection number [2803].
Of the total type material available for the species, only one female paratype from Santa Catarina, Brazil ‘[Breddin Coll., Dallas acuminata] [ DEIC]̍ was not examined. We examined the paratype with the missing pygophore and associated it with one specimen of prepared genitalia available at the Laboratório de Entomologia Sistemática – LES, matching the respective illustration presented by Frey-da-Silva et al. (2002a). This prepared pygophore is very similar to that of another male specimen, without data on the collection label, but with a paratype label and another label numbered [43], deposited at UFRG. However, this specimen, together with three more specimens, was not included in the list of standard material available in the publication.
We believe that this specimen may be the male holotype, designated by the authors; probably an exchange of labels was made when the specimens were returned to MCNZ. This is likely since the original description matches the morphological and genitalic characters for such a specimen and because among the omitted paratypes, a female was found with the following labels: 10 Octuber 1949, C.M. Biezanko leg. // UFRG. Another female, listed in the original description with the label ‘10 Octuber 949 ( UFRG)̍, was not found.
In addition, when examining the female specimen deposited as a holotype and the prepared genitalia described and illustrated for the species, we found that the female associated with the prepared genitalia has somewhat different morphological and genital characters.
MCNZ |
Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Museu de Ciencias Naturais da Fundacao Zoo-Botanica do Rio Grande do Sul |
UFRG |
Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto de Biologia |
MECB |
Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Museu Entomologico Ceslau Biezanko |
MACN |
Argentina, Buenos Aires, Museo Argentina de Ciencias Naturales |
DEIC |
Germany, Muencheberg, Deutsches Entomologisches Institut im ZALF |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paramecocephala bergrothi Frey-da-Silva and Grazia, 2002
de Barros, Lurdiana Dayse, Barão, Kim Ribeiro & Grazia, Jocelia 2022 |
Mecocephala rubripes Pirán 1967: 21
Piran 1967: 21 |