Psilonyx humeralis Hsia, 1949
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2023.72.1.067 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:634FBB9C-FFE9-4C2A-9525-1A70476C137F |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/615F87AD-FF9F-FFE1-359B-3634066E5279 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Psilonyx humeralis Hsia, 1949 |
| status |
|
Psilonyx humeralis Hsia, 1949 View in CoL . Sinensia 19: 25 294 –
Type locality: China: Zhejiang, Tienmushan – Type
collection: unknown.
References for identification. Lehr (1961), Kuroda (2020).
New records. Nagano Pref., Ueda, Sugadaira Re- search Station, grassland (B1): 29 Jun.–5 Jul. 2014 (1); Nagano Pref., Ueda, Sugadaira Research Station, for- est (B2): 29 Jun.–5 Jul. 2014 (1); Nagano Pref., Ueda, Sugadaira Research Station, grassland (B1): 5–19 Jul. 2014 (1); Nagano Pref., Ueda, Sugadaira Research Sta- tion, grassland (B1): 19 Jul.–2 Aug. 2014 (1); Nagano Pref., Ueda, Sugadaira Research Station, grassland (B1): 2–11 Aug. 2014 (1); Nagano Pref., Ueda, Sugadaira Re- search Station, forest (B2): 2–11 Aug. 2014 (1); Nagano Pref., Ueda, Sugadaira Research Station, grassland (B1): 11–23 Aug. 2014 (1), Kumamoto Pref., Izumi-mura, Siibagoe: 24 Aug. 1997 (1).
Distribution. Japan: Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku; Russia: Primorsky Krai; China: Zhejiang Province.
Cophinopoda chinensis (Fabricius, 1794)
Fig. 11C–D View Fig
Asilus chinensis Fabricius, 1794 . Entomol. syst. Tome IV: 383 – Type locality: “ China ” – Type collection: ZMUC [SD].
Dasypogon flavescens Fabricius, 1805 . Syst. Antl.: 169 – Type locality: Indonesia: Sumatra – Type collection: ZMUC [SD].
Ommatius fulvidus Wiedemann, 1821 . Dipt. exot. [Ed.2] Pars I: 214 – Type-locality: Indonesia: Java – Type col- lection: ZMUC [SD].
Ommatius coryphe Walker, 1849 . List Dipt. Brit. Mus., part 2: 469 – Type locality: not given – Type collection: BMNH [SD].
Ommatius chinensis : Matsumura (1931): Illustr. ins. Japan: 325.
References for identification. Tsacas & Artigas (1994).
New records. Fukuoka Pref., Fukuoka, Chayama: 20 Jun. 1999 (1); Fukuoka Pref., Fukuoka, Chayama: 16 Jul. 1999 (1).
Distribution. Japan: Honshu; India; Sri Lanka; China; Vietnam; Java; Sumatra.
Remarks. According to Tsacas & Artigas (1994), C. chinensis and C. oldroydi have very similar female genitalia. Their key mentions the structure of sternite VIII to distinguish both. Our specimens clearly key to C. chinensis and lack the patch of black bristles on sternite III mentioned in the description of C. oldroydi and not mentioned in the redescription of the female holotype of C. chinensis . Tsacas & Artigas (1994) described C. oldroydi from Japan and recorded C. chinensis from the Asian mainland. However, according to Tagawa (2020) the separation of both species is doubtful.
Grypoctonus aino Speiser, 1928
Fig. 12A–D View Fig
Grypoctonus aino Speiser, 1928 . Schr. phys.-okon. Ges. Konigsberg 65: 156 – Type locality: Japan: Nagasaki – Type collection: ZSMC [ Hradský & Geller-Grimm (1999)].
References for identification. Hradský & Geller-Grimm (1999), Tagawa (2020).
New records. Fukuoka Pref., Mount Sefuri: 25 Oct. 1997 (4).
Distribution. Japan: Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu.
Remarks. Lehr (1988) listed G. aino as synonym of Grypoctonus hatakeyamae (Matsumura, 1916) , but Hradský & Geller-Grimm (1999) studied the types of Speiser and concluded that G. aino is a valid species based on the wing venation and the morphology of the male genitalia.
Stichopogon gracilifemur Nagatomi, 1983 View in CoL
Fig. 13A–B View Fig
Stichopogon gracilifemur Nagatomi, 1983 View in CoL . Kontyû 51: 476 – Type locality: Japan: Nagano Pref., Takato – Type collection: unknown [ Nagatomi (1983) stated that the holotype was temporarily deposited at the Faculty of Agriculture , Kagoshima University, Kagoshi- ma, Japan] .
References for identification. Nagatomi (1983), Tagawa (2020).
New records. Kumamoto Pref., Itsuki-mura: 25 Aug. 1998 (5).
Distribution. Japan: Honshu, Kyushu.
Remarks. These are the first distribution records of this species for Kyushu.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
