Cacoecia fulva, Filipjev, 1962
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5627.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:257AE302-7CC5-403D-BE85-81AC0B388CB2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15326320 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5857225F-FFFC-5C1F-A390-FA00FBBEFEC6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cacoecia fulva |
status |
|
11. fulva Filipjev, 1962 View in CoL ( Figs 13 View FIGURES 3–20 , 58 View FIGURES 54–66 , 78 View FIGURES 67–78 )
Cacoecia fulva Filipjev, 1962 View in CoL . Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR 30: 371. Figs 5-7 View FIGURES 3–20 . TL: Russia, “Приморск. Край, Сучан, Тигровое [Primorsk[y] Krai, Suchan, Tigrovoye]” (Far East, Partizansk [Sutchan] District, Tigrovoye).
Types. Holotype ♂: “Уссур. край, Сучан, Тигровое, 22.VII.28, Куренцов [Ussuri Region, Suchan, Tigrovoye, 22.VII.28, Kurentsov]”, “Оригинал рисунка [Original drawing]”, gold circle, “Praep. micr. SVN 10005 Daemilus fulva ( Filipjev, 1962) S. Nedoshivina View in CoL praep.”, “Holotypus Cacoecia fulva Fil. View in CoL ”, “ZISP INS_LEP_0001634”, “Praep. micr. SVN 10005 Daemilus fulva ( Filipjev, 1962) S. Nedoshivina View in CoL pr. 2010”.
Paratypes: 2 ♂ and ♀ – ♀ “Уссур. край, Сучан, ХуалаЗа, Куренцов, 21. VII.28 [ Ussuri Region , Sutschan , Khualaza , Kurentsov , 21. VII.28]”, “ Praep. micr. № 2992 | Latiunca fulva Fil. ♀ Ussuri ”, “Paratypus Cacoecia fulva Fil. ” ; ♂ “Уссур. край, Сучан, Куренцов, 26. VII.28 [ Ussuri Region , Sutschan, Kurentsov, 26. VII.28]”, white circle, “брюшко потерЯно [abdomen lost], “Paratypus Cacoecia fulva Fil. ” ; ♂ “Сучанский район Уссур. кр. Васильев [ Sutschan district , Ussuri Region , Vasilyev]”, white circle, “ Praep. micr. № 2992 | Latiunca fulva Fil. ♂ Ussuri”, “Paratypus Cacoecia fulva Fil. ”, “Praep. micr. SVN 24217 Daemilus fulva ( Filipjev, 1962) S. Nedoshivina pr. 2024” .
Present status. Daemilus fulva ( Filipjev, 1962) .
Comments. The collection date of the male paratype collected by Kurentsov was mentioned in the original description as 28. VII.28 probably by mistake. The specimen deposited in ZISP was collected 26. VII.28 and undoubtedly belongs to the type series. Genitalia of both sexes were illustrated in the original description. In Gilligan et al. (2018), type locality was imprecisely listed as “Russia, Pri-morski Territory” .
ZISP |
Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cacoecia fulva
Nedoshivina, Svetlana V. 2025 |
Cacoecia fulva
Filipjev 1962 |
Cacoecia fulva Fil.
Filipjev 1962 |