Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1240.149456 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E4DC11B-A4C8-42B4-BD8B-EE215725578F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15626726 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/54DBB9BF-6D4B-5E9B-A1FD-0995D087E57A |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 |
status |
|
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 View in CoL
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 3 C, D View Figure 3 , 14 View Figure 14 , 15 View Figure 15 , 23 A, B View Figure 23
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826: 91; Walckenaer 1837: 555 (♂); Simon 1875: 287 (♀); Simon 1932: 854, 884, figs 1299, 1301 (♂ ♀); Zhu and Wang 1963: 477, fig. 28 (♀); Dondale 1964: 825, figs 1, 2, 5, 7–9 (♂ ♀, S of P. rufus virescens); Yaginuma 1986: 216, fig. 121.3 (♀); Song et al. 1999: 476, fig. 271 L (♀); Benjamin 2011: 19, fig. 62 A – G (♂ ♀); Yin et al. 2012: 1248, fig. 670 a, b (♀); Kim and Lee 2017: 76, fig. 43 A – D, pl. 14 (♂ ♀); Zhang et al. 2022: 264, fig. 196 A – G (♂ ♀); Jang et al. 2024 b: 280, figs 1 A – K, 2 B, C (♂ ♀, S of P. pseudoexilis). View in CoL
Philodromus clarkii : Blackwall 1850: 338 (♂);
Artama rufus : Simon 1864: 416.
Philodromus pellax : Herman 1879: 219, 371 (♂ ♀).
Philodromus clarae : Bertkau 1880: 246, pl. 6, fig. 1 (♂ ♀).
Philodromus pictus View in CoL : Emerton 1892: 373, pl. 31, fig. 2 (♂ ♀); Emerton 1902: 37, figs 108–110 (♂ ♀).
Philodromus exilis View in CoL : Banks 1892: 63, pl. 2, fig. 40 (♀).
Philodromus rufus virescens View in CoL : Simon 1932: 854, 885 (♀).
Philodromus pseudoexilis View in CoL : Paik 1979: 437, figs 81–89 (♂ ♀); Kim and Jung 2001: 199, figs 41–45 (♂ ♀). 3
Material examined.
China: Guizhou Province: • 1 ♀, Guiyang City, Wudang District, Baoli Park ; 26.63°N, 106.75°E; 1310 m a. s. l.; 5 June 2017; H. Yu et al. leg GoogleMaps . • 1 ♂, 1 ♀ ( YHGY 510 and YHGY 511 used for sequencing, GenBank accession numbers in Table 1 View Table 1 ), Guiyang City, Huaxi District, University Town ; 26.38°N, 106.65°E; 1173 m a. s. l.; 15 July 2024; Q. Jiang et al. leg GoogleMaps . • 1 ♂, 2 ♀ (1 ♀, YHGY 304 used for sequencing, GenBank accession numbers in Table 1 View Table 1 ), Guiyang City, Huaxi District, Dangwu Town, Xiaba Village ; 26.38°N, 106.60°E; 1138 m a. s. l.; 19 May 2022; H. Yu et al. leg GoogleMaps . • 1 ♀, Guiyang City, Huaxi District, Gao po Miao Town, Diba Village ; 26.26°N, 106.85°E; 1216 m a. s. l.; 21 May 2022; H. Yu et al. leg GoogleMaps . • 1 ♀, Tongren City, Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Yinjiang Tujia and Miao Autonomous County, Guantai Mountain ; 27.98°N, 108.69°E; 1025 m a. s. l.; 20 July 2021; H. Yu et al. leg. GoogleMaps ; Hubei Province: • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Xianning City, Jiugongshan National Nature Reserve, Yunzhonghu Scenic Area ; 29.39°N, 114.65°E; 480 m a. s. l.; 3 July 2020; Q. Lu et al. leg GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis and description.
See Paik (1979), Song and Zhu (1997), Yin et al. (2012) and Jang et al. (2024 b). Habitus as in Figs 14 A – C View Figure 14 , 15 A – C View Figure 15 . Male palp as in Fig. 14 D – F View Figure 14 , epigyne as in Fig. 15 D, E View Figure 15 .
Distribution.
North America, Europe, Turkey, Caucasus, Russia (Europe to Far East), Kazakhstan, Iran, Central Asia, Mongolia, China (Fujian, Yunnan, Sichuan, Xizang, Shanxi, Hebei, Gansu, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, Jilin, Guizhou, Ningxia, Shandong, Shaanxi; distribution records in Guizhou and Hubei as in Fig. 23 View Figure 23 ), Korea, Japan.
Comments.
This species is widely distributed and has been reported from several countries and regions across the Palearctic ( WSC 2025). In China, the species has distribution records in multiple provinces, but there were no formal records of its presence in Guizhou Province before 2022, and no formal records in Hubei to date. Long et al. (2022) reported it as a new record for Guizhou based on specimens from Guiyang but did not provide diagnostic illustrations. Newly available specimens indicate that the species is also distributed in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve in Guizhou Province and Jiugongshan National Nature Reserve in Hubei Province (Fig. 23 View Figure 23 ). This paper represents the first formal report of the species’ distribution in Hubei Province.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826
Zhang, Jianshuang, Zhang, Chengwen & Zhong, Yang 2025 |
Philodromus pseudoexilis
Kim JP & Jung JY 2001: 199 |
Paik KY 1979: 437 |
Philodromus rufus virescens
Simon E 1932: 854 |
Philodromus pictus
Emerton JH 1902: 37 |
Emerton JH 1892: 373 |
Philodromus exilis
Banks N 1892: 63 |
Philodromus clarae
Bertkau P 1880: 246 |
Philodromus pellax
Herman O 1879: 219 |
Artama rufus
Simon E 1864: 416 |
Philodromus clarkii
Blackwall J 1850: 338 |
Philodromus rufus
Zhang F & Peng JY & Zhang BS 2022: 264 |
Kim ST & Lee SY 2017: 76 |
Yin CM & Peng XJ & Yan HM & Bao YH & Xu X & Tang G & Zhou QS & Liu P 2012: 1248 |
Benjamin SP 2011: 19 |
Song DX & Zhu MS & Chen J 1999: 476 |
Yaginuma T 1986: 216 |
Dondale CD 1964: 825 |
Zhu CD & Wang FZ 1963: 477 |
Simon E 1932: 854 |
Simon E 1875: 287 |
Walckenaer CA 1837: 555 |
Walckenaer CA 1826: 91 |
Jang CM & Yoo JS & Kim ST : 280 |