Eurytoma cearae Ashmead, 1908
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689.v41.e23105 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/535387F3-FF9A-FFB4-FCF4-FB4DFDF251A4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eurytoma cearae Ashmead, 1908 |
status |
|
Eurytoma cearae Ashmead, 1908 nomen nudum
Euritoma cearae Ashmead, 1908 (in Rocha 1908: 70, nomen nudum, misspelling). Rocha (1918: 21 nomen nudum, checklist).
Eurytoma cearae Ashmead, 1908 : Rocha (1950: 292, checklist, biology); Silva (1973: 109, checklist, biology).
Remarks. Rocha (1908) misspelled the generic epithet Eurytoma as Euritoma . Rocha (1950) cited E. cearae as “ parasites of larvae of galls of Myrtaceae ” (translated from p. 292). Silva (1973) cited“ parasites of cecidomyiid larvae of myrtaceae [sic.]” (translated from p. 292), probably reproducing Rocha’s (1950) report. This species is likely Rileya cearae ( Crawford, 1910) described on twelve specimens collected by F. D. da Rocha in Ceará, Brazil. According to the original description, these specimens were “bred from galls of Mayrellus mirabilis ”, also described based on specimens collected by F. D. da Rocha in Ceara, Brazil. Crawford (1910) wrote M. mirabilis specimens was “ bred from galls of unknow plant ”. Mayrellus mirabilis belongs to Melanosomellidae (formely Ormocerinae : Pteromalidae ) and, based on information available, it is impossible to associate this species with that cited by Rocha (1908, 1918, 1950).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eurytoma cearae Ashmead, 1908
Tavares, Marcelo T., Perioto, Nelson W., Lara, Rogéria I. R., Wengrat, Ana P. G. S., Shimbori, Eduardo M. & Fernandes, Daniell R. R. 2024 |
Eurytoma cearae
Silva AG 1973: 109 |
Rocha D 1950: 292 |
Euritoma cearae
Rocha D 1918: 21 |
Rocha D 1908: 70 |