Zele curvinervis Fang, van Achterberg & Chen, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1248.158182 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5C45F816-3D1E-4443-A7B3-8365D411639D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16746234 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/508E3266-99C8-5128-AEFF-02553DB0AD23 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Zele curvinervis Fang, van Achterberg & Chen |
status |
sp. nov. |
Zele curvinervis Fang, van Achterberg & Chen sp. nov.
Fig. 11 View Figure 11
Type material.
Holotype. China – Sichuan Prov. • ♀; Ganzizangzu Zizhizhou, Luding, Moxi ; 19 Jun. 2005; light trap; ( ZJUH) No. 202401058 . Paratype. China – Qinghai Prov. • 1 ♀; Yushuzangzu Zizhizhou, Nangqian ; 25 Jun. 2005; Jiang-li Tan leg.; ( ZJUH) No. 202401048. GenBank accession no. PV 356308 , PV 356298 .
Diagnosis.
Eyes more protruding and temples more directly narrowed in dorsal view (Fig. 11 H View Figure 11 ); vein m-cu of fore wing slightly curved (Fig. 11 D View Figure 11 ); anterior tentorial pits close to eyes (Fig. 11 G View Figure 11 ) second tergite black; mandible yellowish (except dark apex) (Fig. 11 G View Figure 11 ); pterostigma pale yellowish (Fig. 11 D View Figure 11 ); first tergite ~ 2.3 × longer than its apical width; dorsope of first tergite small and space between dorsope much wider than dorsope and sculptured (Fig. 11 K View Figure 11 ); hind tarsus mainly white; ovipositor sheath ~ 0.24 × as long as fore wing.
Comparative diagnosis.
Very similar to Z. shaanxiensis but differs mainly by the more protruding eyes (less protruding in Z. shaanxiensis ), curved vein m-cu of fore wing (straight in Z. shaanxiensis ) and anterior tentorial pits close to eyes (distinctly removed from eyes in Z. shaanxiensis ).
Description.
Holotype, ♀, length of fore wing 8.0 mm, of body 8.0 mm, and antenna 1.2 × as long as fore wing.
Head. Antennal segments 42, third segment nearly as long as fourth segment and third, fourth and penultimate segments 3.3 ×, 3.1 ×, and 1.8 × longer than wide, respectively; length of maxillary palp 1.5 × longer than height of head; frons smooth and behind antennal sockets impressed; POL: diameter of posterior ocellus: OOL = 12: 10: 5; vertex convex, punctulate and densely setose (Fig. 11 H View Figure 11 ); clypeus rather convex in lateral view, widely smooth, punctate medially (Fig. 11 I View Figure 11 ); face largely smooth, it widened ventrally, minimum width of face 1.1 × height of face (Fig. 11 G View Figure 11 ); length of eye 2.2 × temple in dorsal view (Fig. 11 H View Figure 11 ); length of malar space 0.3 × basal width of mandible.
Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.6 × its height; side of pronotum reticulate-rugulose ventrally and posteriorly, rugose anteriorly; epicnemial area reticulate-rugulose; precoxal sulcus densely strigate-rugose dorsally, narrowly reticulate-punctate antero-ventrally; dorsal of mesopleuron largely smooth (Fig. 11 B View Figure 11 ); mesosternum almost smooth, finely punctulate; metapleuron smooth anteriorly, and widely scabrous posteriorly; mesoscutal lobes finely punctulate and shiny; notauli anteriorly finely and narrowly crenulate, mesoscutum medio-posteriorly widely crenulate-rugose and with a long carina; scutellar sulcus deep and rather narrow with one long obvious median carina; scutellum rather convex and finely punctulate; metanotum with small smooth knob medio-posteriorly, with one short media carina on knob, with two weakly converging long carinae medially; propodeum widely reticulate-rugose, subbasal transverse carina of propodeum mainly straight to curved posteriad, comparatively finely punctulate anteriorly; in lateral view propodeum gradually lowered posteriorly (Fig. 11 B, C View Figure 11 ).
Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 11 D View Figure 11 ): r: 3 - SR: SR 1 = 9: 20: 105; 2 - SR: 3 - SR: r-m = 23: 20: 14; 1 - CU 1: 2 - CU 1 = 3: 60; cu-a vertical, postfurcal. Hind wing (Fig. 11 E View Figure 11 ): r absent; M + CU: 1 - M = 62: 12; 1 r-m 3.3 × 1 - M; marginal cell strongly widened apically (Fig. 11 E View Figure 11 ).
Legs. Hind coxa densely punctate dorsally; length of fore femur 8.0 × its width (Fig. 11 L View Figure 11 ); length of fore tibial spur 0.3 × fore basitarsus (Fig. 11 M View Figure 11 ); lengths of hind femur and basitarsus 7.3 × and 8.5 × their widths, respectively (Fig. 11 N View Figure 11 ).
Metasoma. First tergite 2.3 × longer than its apical width, its surface rugulose; dorsope comparatively small and narrow, area in front of dorsope depressed (Fig. 11 K View Figure 11 ), laterope comparatively narrow (Fig. 11 J View Figure 11 ); second tergite mainly bare, smooth; ovipositor comparatively robust basally; length of ovipositor sheath 0.24 × length of fore wing, sheath with moderately erect and short setae (Fig. 11 F View Figure 11 ).
Colour. Mesosoma, metasoma, coxae and trochanters of middle and hind legs, hind femur, hind tibia (except dark brown apical 1 / 3) black; head, fore and middle legs mainly brownish yellow; hind tarsus white; antenna and veins C + SC + R, 1 - M and cu-a of fore wing dark brown; palpi, pterostigma and other veins pale yellow; and ovipositor sheath (except pale whitish apex) brown.
Variation. Vein 1 r-m of hind wing 3.3–3.6 × as long as vein 1 - M; fore femur of ♀ 8.0–8.5 × longer than wide; hind femur of ♀ 7.0–7.3 × longer than wide; first metasomal tergite 2.3–2.5 × its apical width.
Distribution.
China (Qinghai, Sichuan).
Biology.
Unknown.
Etymology.
Named after the slightly curved vein m-cu of the fore wing; curvus and nervus is Latin respectively for curved and vein.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |