Euglyptus, Broun, 1893
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2025.004 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:37FE974D-9211-440E-BF17-70846B312402 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/501B0F55-3A65-217F-FF28-A1E3669A0870 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Euglyptus |
| status |
|
Key to species of the genus Euglyptus View in CoL
1 Visible tergite 2 (V) with median impression and discal striae ( Figs 1J View Fig , 5D View Fig , 10D View Fig , 13D View Fig , 14D View Fig ). ........................ 2
– Visible tergite 2 (V) lacking median impression and discal striae ( Figs 2D View Fig , 3D View Fig , 4D View Fig , 7D View Fig , 8D View Fig , 9D View Fig , 11D View Fig , 12D View Fig , 15D View Fig ). ......................................................................... 7
2(1) Elytra with discal stria extending from outer (fourth) fovea to elytral posterior margin ( Figs 1H View Fig , 14A View Fig ). .... 3
– Elytra lacking discal stria extending from outer (fourth) fovea ( Figs 5A View Fig , 10A View Fig , 13A View Fig ). ......................... 5
3(2) Eye with approximately 9–10 facets in dorsal view............................................. E. longiceps Broun, 1921 View in CoL
– Eye with more than 15 facets in dorsal view. ........... 4
4(3) Pronotum with distinct punctures, narrower than head ( Figs 6A–B View Fig ); paramere short, with small basal apophysis, strongly curved laterally ( Figs 6C–H View Fig ). ....... ............................................... E. elegans Broun, 1893 View in CoL
– Pronotum almost lacking punctures, wider than head ( Figs 14A–B View Fig ); paramere short, with small apophysis located in basal fourth, straight in ventral and lateral view ( Figs 14E–J View Fig ). ............. E. sublaevis Broun, 1921 View in CoL
5(2) Width of median impression of visible tergite 2 approximately 1/16 of its width (excluding paratergites) ( Fig. 13D View Fig ); median lobe of aedeagus undivided ( Figs 13E–J View Fig ). .......................... E. robertensis sp. nov.
– Width of median impression of visible tergite 2 approximately 1/6–1/7 of its width (excluding paratergites) ( Figs 5D View Fig , 10D View Fig ); median lobe of aedeagus forked or split ( Figs 5E–J View Fig , 10E–J View Fig ). ........................................... 6
6(5) Body length more than 1.4 mm, forebody length more than 1.0 mm ( Fig. 5A View Fig ); antennomere 5 approximately 1.3 times longer than wide, joint between antennomeres 4–7 relatively long ( Fig. 5C View Fig ); median lobe with complex structure, small branch extends from posterior 1/3, apex of small branch with sharply bifurcate apophysis, median lobe with several sharp and long apophyses ( Figs 5E–J View Fig ). ........ E. dunedinensis sp. nov.
– Body length less than 1.3 mm, forebody length less than 0.9 mm ( Fig. 10A View Fig ); antennomere 5 approximately 1.7 times longer than wide, joint between antennomeres 4–7 relatively short ( Fig. 10C View Fig ); median lobe trifurcate in distal part, left apophysis apex bifurcate, middle and right apophyses simple with sharp apex, right apophysis longest in ventral view ( Figs 10E–J View Fig ). ........................................................ E. parvus sp. nov.
7(1) Antennomere X inverted trapezoidal shape, widest in or near apex, usually wider than XI ( Figs 2C View Fig , 3C View Fig , 4C View Fig , 7C View Fig , 8C View Fig , 11C View Fig , 15C View Fig ). ............................................. 8
– Antennomere X globular shape, widest in or near middle, usually narrower than XI ( Figs 9C View Fig , 12C View Fig ). .................. 14
8(7) Antennomere V as long as wide ( Fig. 11A View Fig ). ............. .......................................... E. punctatosimilis sp. nov.
– Antennomere V distinctly longer than wide ( Figs 2A View Fig , 3A View Fig , 4A View Fig , 7A View Fig , 8A View Fig , 15A View Fig ). .............................................. 9
9(8) Body length less than 1.3 mm, forebody length less than 1.0 mm; pronotum slightly wider than long ( Figs 3A–B View Fig , 4A–B View Fig ). ......................................................... 10
– Body length more than 1.4 mm, forebody length more than 1.0 mm; pronotum slightly longer than wide ( Figs 2A–B View Fig , 7A–B View Fig , 8A–B View Fig , 15A–B View Fig ). ................................ 11
10(9) Left paramere apex slightly convex, right paramere relatively narrow basally, apex somewhat sinuate; median lobe small branch extends from apical fifth, apex of branch bifurcate ( Figs 4E–J View Fig ). ...... E. boreus sp. nov.
– Left paramere apex bluntly rounded, right paramere broad basally, apex pointed; median lobe long branch from apical third, apex of branch not bifurcate ( Figs 3E–J View Fig ). ....................................... E. bifurcatus sp. nov.
11(9) Pronotum with narrow transverse antebasal sulcus ( Fig. 7A View Fig ); median lobe of aedeagus with long and slender apophysis extending from base, this apophysis with two small apical teeth ( Figs 7E–J View Fig ). ...................... ........................................... E. foveicollis Broun, 1912 View in CoL
– Pronotum with broad transverse antebasal sulcus ( Figs 2B View Fig , 8B View Fig , 15B View Fig ); median lobe of aedeagus relatively simple ( Figs 2E–J View Fig , 8E–J View Fig , 15E–J View Fig ). ............................ 12
12(11) Median lobe with distinct apophysis extending from the base ( Figs 8E–J View Fig ). ...... E. latefossatus sp. nov.
– Median lobe unmodified, lacking any apophysis ( Figs 2E–J View Fig , 15E–J View Fig ). ........................................................... 13
13(12) Apex of median lobe with thin membranous structure; right paramere curved laterally in dorsal view ( Figs 2E–J View Fig ). ................ E. abnormis Broun, 1921 View in CoL
– Apex of median lobe with flat apical lobe directed laterally; right paramere not curved in dorsal view ( Figs 15E–J View Fig ). .................................. E. waimatensis sp. nov.
14(7) Antennomere V as long as wide; temples of head posterolaterally angulate; median lobe with apical margin thin and fan-shaped ( Figs 12E–J View Fig ).................. ........................................ E. punctatus (Broun, 1893) View in CoL
– Antennomere V distinctly longer than wide; temples of head posterolaterally oblique; median lobe apex abruptly bent dorsally ( Figs 9E–J View Fig ). .............................. ........................................ E. longicornis Broun, 1912 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
