Croton macrocarpus Ridl.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2023.68.01.01 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4F6387C4-DF62-E504-FCE7-F8C0FE2F3552 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Croton macrocarpus Ridl. |
status |
|
12. Croton macrocarpus Ridl. View in CoL — Fig. 2d View Fig
Croton macrocarpus Ridl. (1925) 332 (non Rchb. ex Müll.Arg. (1866) 698, nom. nud.). — Croton grandifructus Radcl. - Sm. & Govaerts (1997) 187, nom. superfl., see note 2. — Lectotype (designated here): I.H. Burkill 6519 (lecto K [ K000959163 ]*;isolecto A [00105623]*), Malaysia, Selangor, Telok Forest Reserve , Klang.
Treelets, c. 6 m tall, dbh c. 10 cm; young branchlets densely pubescent,hardly glabrescent. Indumentum consisting of creamy to amber stellate trichomes with a darker brown centre, 0.3–0.6 mm diam (up to 1.2 mm on ovary), often slightly porrect, with one short central radius and 6–12 free radii. Stipules ensiform to subulate, 5–8 by 0.5–0.8 mm, densely pubescent on both sides, soon caducous. Leaves alternate; petiole (3–) 6–13 cm long, round, slightly sulcate, at most slightly grooved above, densely to slightly pubescent; glands 1 or 2 pairs of distinctly stalked discs, lateral abaxially on the very apex of the petiole, 0.5–1 mm diam, stalk 0.3–1 mm long ( Fig. 2d View Fig ), additional smaller marginal glands common, 0.3–0.6 mm diam, stalk 0.2–0.5 mm long; blade elliptic, 15–30(–35) by 5–10 cm, 2.8–3.6 times longer than wide, chartaceous to subcoriaceous, base subcordate, margin (sub)serrate, teeth 2–6 mm apart, apex acuminate, adaxial side glabrous, but midrib pubescent, abaxial side slightly to densely pubescent, surface always visible except in very young leaves; venation distinct, raised on both sides, basally not to indistinctly triplinerved, secondary veins 13–17 pairs, higher order veins distinct on both sides. Inflorescences 1–4 per node, 11–35 cm long, erect, densely pubescent all over, basally 20– 30 pistillate flowers, rarely 1–2 staminate flowers in the cymule of a pistillate flower, apically 1–4 staminate flowers per node; bracts narrowly triangular, 2–3.5 by 0.5–1.5 mm, outside with scattered trichomes, with a patch of simple trichomes on apex, inside glabrous, soon caducous. Staminate flowers 5–6 mm diam; pedicel 3–9(–11) mm long, round, densely pubescent; sepals triangular-ovate, c. 2.5–3 by 1.5–2 mm, outside pubescent near base to glabrous near apex, inside glabrous; petals oblong, 2–2.3 by 0.7–1 mm, outside glabrous; stamens c. 15, free, filaments 3–4 mm long, anthers c. 1 by 0.5 mm. Pistillate flowers 10 –13 mm diam; pedicel c. 4 mm long (to 10 mm in fruit), sulcate, densely pubescent; sepals triangular-ovate to narrowly triangular, 4.5–6 by 2– 3 mm, outside densely to slightly pubescent, with a patch of short simple trichomes on apex, much longer than ovary; petals triangular-ovate to ensiform, 2–2.5 by 0.4–0.7 mm, outside densely pubescent, hispid on margin and apex, not caducous; ovary globose, 3.5–5 by 3–4 mm, densely yellowish hispid, style absent, stigmas c. 7 mm long, once divided to c. 5.5 mm from apex, slightly pubescent near base. Capsules cylindrical globose, slightly trilobate, c. 28 mm high, c. 22 mm diam, sulcate, densely pubescent; pericarp very thick (c. 1.5 mm) and woody; columella c. 23 mm long. Seeds obovoid, heavily flattened, c. 19 by 13 mm, with a groove on the inside, glabrous, carunculate.
Distribution — Malesia: Malay Peninsula, Sumatra (Aceh).
Habitat & Ecology — Partly logged-over forest, dry land forest on rolling hills, yellow-red loamy soil. Altitude: c. 30– 40 m. Flowering: August; fruiting: August.
Affinities — Related to C. heterocarpus ( Fig. 1 View Fig : group I 2) and should be classified in C. section Furcaria ( Webster 1993) , though that section still has to be corroborated phylogenetically.
Notes — 1. Only one collection from Sumatra (de Wilde & de WildeDuyfjes 20590, L) and one from the Malay Peninsula (Burkill 6519, A, K).
2. Radcliffe-Smith & Govaerts (1997) assumed that Müller’s name (1866) was correct and regarded Ridley’s name ( Ridley 1925) as a later incorrect homonym. However, Müller only noted the name without a description, which makes it an invalid name. Therefore, Ridley’s name is correct and Radcliffe-Smith & Govaerts created a superfluous name (see Esser 2002a: 21).
3. Two sequences, duplicates of the same collection, were used in the phylogenetic analysis.These showed up as a trichotomy in the cladogram ( Fig. 1 View Fig ) with one specimen of C. heterocarpus . However, the branches leading to the two entries of C. macrocarpus are very short, which proves that they belong to the same specimen indeed.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.