Yunohamella Yoshida, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1224.138987 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BE2CD401-AB28-4488-8EE8-1457F94F92FB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14712905 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4CA2B02C-9D8F-50C1-902B-FBD2EDD53D3D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Yunohamella Yoshida, 2007 |
status |
|
Genus Yunohamella Yoshida, 2007 View in CoL
Type species.
Theridion yunohamense Bösenberg & Strand, 1906 (= Yunohamella yunohamensis ) from Japan.
Diagnosis.
Species of Yunohamella are similar to those of Takayus (compare Figs 2 A – D View Figure 2 , 4 A – D View Figure 4 , 5 C – E View Figure 5 , 6 C, D View Figure 6 , 7 D – F View Figure 7 , 8 A, B View Figure 8 , 9 D – F View Figure 9 ; Gao and Li 2014: figs 107–109; Marusik and Logunov 2017: figs 37–39; Lee and Kim 2021: figs 3 E – G, 4 A, B with Zhu 1998: figs 80 B – E, 83 B – E, 93 B – E, 94 B – E, 108 B – E, 114 B – F, 115 B – E, 116 B – E, 117 B – E, 118 B – E, 119 B – E, 120 B – D, 125 B, C) in having a large tegulum and a small median apophysis, a conductor conjugating with tegulum. However, Yunohamella can be distinguished from Takayus by the following: embolus thin; tegular apophysis distinct; and epigyne without a pointed scapus or with a blunt scapus (vs embolus broad, tegular apophysis invisible before expanded, epigyne with a pointed scapus in Takayus ).
Species of Yunohamella can be distinguished from Theridion (compare Figs 2 A – D View Figure 2 , 4 A – D View Figure 4 , 5 C – E View Figure 5 , 6 C, D View Figure 6 , 7 D – F View Figure 7 , 8 A, B View Figure 8 , 9 D – F View Figure 9 ; Gao and Li 2014: figs 107–109; Marusik and Logunov 2017: figs 37–39; Lee and Kim 2021: figs 3 E – G, 4 A, B with Zhu 1998: figs 73 B – E, 76 B – E, 85 B – E, 88 B – E, 89 B – D, 90 B – E, 91 B, C, 97 B – E, 98 B – E, 106 B – E, 109 B – E, 110 B – D 123 B – E, 124 B – E) by the following: embolus short and straight; tegulum large; conductor conjugating with tegulum; epigyne without depression (vs embolus long and circular; tegulum not large; conductor separated; epigyne with a distinct depression in Takayus ) ( Yoshida 2007).
Species of Yunohamella can be distinguished from Cryptachaea (compare Figs 2 D View Figure 2 , 4 D View Figure 4 , 8 A, B View Figure 8 ; Levi 1957: fig. 323 with Levi 1955: fig. 82) in having a median apophysis separated from the embolus and the present tegular apophysis (vs median apophysis attached to the embolus and tegular apophysis absent in Cryptachaea ).
Distribution.
Asia, Europe, North America.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.