Ficus williamsii (Rusby) Rossberg. Repert., 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.711.3.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4C1887FD-FF9B-FFE5-07E0-E4D33395AA07 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ficus williamsii (Rusby) Rossberg. Repert. |
status |
sp. nov. |
269. Ficus williamsii (Rusby) Rossberg. Repert. View in CoL Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 42: 61. 1937, nom. illeg., non Robinson (1908: 177). ≡ Urostigma williamsii Rusby. Bull. View in CoL New York Bot. Gard. 6(22): 499. 1910. TYPE:— BOLIVIA. La Paz: trail Ixiamas-Tumupasa , 29 December 1901, R. S. Williams 413 (lectotype, designated here: NY–285068!; isolectotype: K–000512028!). Remaining syntypes: BOLIVIA, Williams 420 (K–000512027!); Williams 146 (not found).
Nomenclatural notes:— Rusby (1910) described this taxon based on syntypes Williams 413, Williams 146, and Williams 420, and did not designate a holotype or herbarium. Berg & Villavicencio (2004) cited Williams 413 in NY as the “ holotype ”, but since this happened after 1 January 2001 and they did not use the term “designated here” or an equivalent statement as required by Art. 7.11, their citation did not constitute an effective designation of a lectotype. We designate Williams 413 (NY285068) as the lectotype because it represents the most complete and diagnostic specimen.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ficus williamsii (Rusby) Rossberg. Repert.
Mitidieri-Rivera, Nicole, Damián-Parizaca, Alexander, Gardner, Elliot M., Plata-Castro, Angelo D., Zerega, Nyree J. C. & Pederneiras, Leandro C. 2025 |
Ficus williamsii (Rusby)
Rusby 1937: 61 |
Urostigma williamsii
Rusby. Bull. 1910: 499 |